The numbers are in: 576 rwhp @ 4.5 psi SAE
10-30-2006, 11:48 PM
#42
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TT Coupe
i didnt mean to put down speed inc in any way, I just meant how dude was referring to what they did like it was the gospel and SP should have their dyno fixed because speed inc didnt make those numbers before and its written in stone.
Something doesn't seem right. Those turbos don't seem big enough and you don't have enough cubes. But that's just me...Looking forward to the dyno graph.
10-31-2006, 12:00 AM
#43
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the numbers do seem prett high, but remember, there just numbers, and its just psi. you guys are forgetting VE and CFM /= PSI. whatever that cam is could ****** flow like a mother, somehow not leaking off boost, ie. lower manifold psi, more cylinder psi. im interested in this :snky: cam. im assuming you have overlap?
10-31-2006, 12:42 AM
#45
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jamestown, NY
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hes got that magic stick (read with rythm) but i doubt if he'll let you lick it 
Its late and im tired
Definately post up the graph as soon as you get it, sounds compelling.
-john
Its late and im tired
Definately post up the graph as soon as you get it, sounds compelling.
-john
BOSS APPROVED!
10-31-2006, 09:23 AM
#49
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did say this was bench racing... The numbers don't calculate, no matter what an owner believes. A cam of major proportions is only going to spool the turbo quicker, not necessarily make more ultimate power, as the intake manifold/port haven't been addressed.
I also said, "the track will set you free". Some may recognize the allusion.
For the definitive statement: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....1&postcount=10
SC-
I also said, "the track will set you free". Some may recognize the allusion.
For the definitive statement: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....1&postcount=10
SC-
10-31-2006, 07:54 PM
#53
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JPMuscle
that was a joke..... get it?
-john
-john
Hence why he addressed you as "50 (fifty-cent, the hip-hop artist)," thereby honoring your post's humor and revealing the acknowledgement that your post was, in fact, a joke.
I EVEN found it a bit funny, too... How 'bout that?
Last edited by bboyferal; 10-31-2006 at 08:00 PM.
11-01-2006, 07:31 AM
#56
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newark, Tx.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
numbers seem high to me too. We did twin GT-35r's and made 605rwhp at 10psi in a very mild 347. That seems pretty normal to me.
Who am I to say though. Congrats on your build.
Who am I to say though. Congrats on your build.
11-01-2006, 01:45 PM
#59
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, there's obviously a secret ingredient since many here have similar set-ups and cannot recreate those results under the same conditions, so...
either no one else knows what they're doing, or conditions are not the same as the people running the same boost with MUCH less power. I believe, the first is not true, so there must be SOME part on that motor (or tune or dyno...) that's different... aka the secret ingredient, which could just be some eccentric dyno rollers.
either no one else knows what they're doing, or conditions are not the same as the people running the same boost with MUCH less power. I believe, the first is not true, so there must be SOME part on that motor (or tune or dyno...) that's different... aka the secret ingredient, which could just be some eccentric dyno rollers.
11-01-2006, 01:51 PM
#60
Originally Posted by bboyferal
Well, there's obviously a secret ingredient since many here have similar set-ups and cannot recreate those results under the same conditions, so...
either no one else knows what they're doing, or conditions are not the same as the people running the same boost with MUCH less power. I believe, the first is not true, so there must be SOME part on that motor (or tune or dyno...) that's different... aka the secret ingredient, which could just be some eccentric dyno rollers.
either no one else knows what they're doing, or conditions are not the same as the people running the same boost with MUCH less power. I believe, the first is not true, so there must be SOME part on that motor (or tune or dyno...) that's different... aka the secret ingredient, which could just be some eccentric dyno rollers.