What a real muffler for a turbo car looks like
#44
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I added a short 3" glasspack to the tailpipe on the STS it cut down on the spool noise and made the car sound deeper. The stainless tip looks like it used to stock (WS6) Just on the oppisite side.
#48
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: apoopka, fl
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ddnspider
i just got the new muffler on....ninetres ill take that bet!the cars so quiet you hear my electric fans over the rest of the car
#49
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by stevieturbo
What sort of design is the hooker ?
The strange thing was that my old 550 rwhp T-trim combination only gained 5 rwhp when removing the whole 3" Aerochamber cat-back. But, the turbo combination gained a lot more than that when switching from a 3.5" Aerochamber to a 3.5" Magnaflow.
#50
9 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The turbo system must be more sensitive to back pressure then ??
I guess cam specs, axhaust shape or design ( n/a ) and overall power output and many other variables come into it
I guess cam specs, axhaust shape or design ( n/a ) and overall power output and many other variables come into it
#51
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the aerochamber relied on the venturi effect,the inside was straight through but the last half was a large cone with the output still being 3.5" which i would think would make the exhaust move faster than the magnaflow since its just an offset straight through