Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

809 rwhp at 14.4 psi of boost on 93 octane fuel our Mustang Chassis Dyno!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2008 | 08:15 PM
  #21  
Moparnos (The SLP Guy)'s Avatar
Flossin' twin turbos

iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago
Default

damn nice v
Old 02-21-2008 | 10:56 PM
  #22  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!

iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

Wow, I checked that thread out. I like your filter solution. That was quite ingenious.
Old 02-22-2008 | 04:21 AM
  #23  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
Wow, I checked that thread out. I like your filter solution. That was quite ingenious.
Thanks everyone, we appreciate it!

That took a lot of work to get the inlet side to work out, but it came out working really well. Bob
Old 02-22-2008 | 09:21 AM
  #24  
Ponyhntr's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lee's Summit, MO (KC)
Default

That's awesome Bob, Jake and Brent!
Old 02-22-2008 | 12:42 PM
  #25  
BLNLS1/RX7's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Fishers,IN.
Default

Outstanding.
Old 02-22-2008 | 01:17 PM
  #26  
MY99TAWS6's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Kelowna,BC
Default

Looks awesome but have question..is the mustang set up to run dynojet numbers ? Our local mustang is set up to give dynojet equivalent numbers which are of course higher than mustang numbers. Its nothing to sneeze at either way but mostly just curious as see lots of mustang dyno posts and guys never mention that if it wasn't set to dynojet equivalent the numbers would be quite a bit higher on the dynojet and if it was then sometimes still hear guys say ,well it would be higher if they had used a dynojet.
Old 02-22-2008 | 03:06 PM
  #27  
topgun1851's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whats the compression ratio?
Old 02-22-2008 | 03:35 PM
  #28  
lmt0705's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,706
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: buffalo NY
Default

Bob uses eddy current, so its a loaded dyno number.
Old 02-22-2008 | 03:46 PM
  #29  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Ponyhntr
That's awesome Bob, Jake and Brent!
Thanks Josh, we appreciate it! Bob
Old 02-22-2008 | 03:49 PM
  #30  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by BLNLS1/RX7
Outstanding.
Thanks Steve! I know you called in this afternoon, but I was glued to the other line! Bob
Old 02-22-2008 | 03:51 PM
  #31  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by MY99TAWS6
Looks awesome but have question..is the mustang set up to run dynojet numbers ? Our local mustang is set up to give dynojet equivalent numbers which are of course higher than mustang numbers. Its nothing to sneeze at either way but mostly just curious as see lots of mustang dyno posts and guys never mention that if it wasn't set to dynojet equivalent the numbers would be quite a bit higher on the dynojet and if it was then sometimes still hear guys say ,well it would be higher if they had used a dynojet.
We always use the eddy current, and yes it would be quite a bit higher in a dynoJet calculation, but I always figure that if I say it is on a Mustang dyno, that people assume we're using the eddy current. Thanks. Bob
Old 02-22-2008 | 03:51 PM
  #32  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by topgun1851
Whats the compression ratio?
9.5/1. Bob
Old 02-22-2008 | 05:28 PM
  #33  
venom ws7's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,965
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: EARTH
Default

Like always awesome work and numbers EPP that thing is the ultimate sleeper wait maybe not with F1A Whine.
lol
Old 02-22-2008 | 05:47 PM
  #34  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by venom ws7
Like always awesome work and numbers EPP that thing is the ultimate sleeper wait maybe not with F1A Whine.
lol
You will here this one coming, for sure. I just rescanned the graph so it is more legible. Bob

Old 02-22-2008 | 06:10 PM
  #35  
Jake@EPP's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Hell AFB
Default

This thing needs a bigger stick or some different 5th / 6th gears. Traction just is not gonna happen, possibly with a huge bracket car tire lol.
Old 02-22-2008 | 07:04 PM
  #36  
CALL911's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,940
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: IN
Default

Thats really impressive Bob! Nice job on it!
Old 02-22-2008 | 07:17 PM
  #37  
blu00rdstr's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dublin, CA
Default

Pretty cool, though your webmaster pasted the story in four times.
Old 02-22-2008 | 10:26 PM
  #38  
Jon@BruteSpeed's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 660
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Under my Formula
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
You will here this one coming, for sure. I just rescanned the graph so it is more legible. Bob

Bob, that makes me sick. That has more RWHP than my blown LT1 at 3500 RPM!!
__________________
95 Pontiac Formula- Stock engine with ATI Procharger, Moser 12 bolt w/4:30 gears, Rossler trans, Neil Chance 4000 stall, M/T ET streets, 10.914@ 121.90mph, 1.452 60ft. GMHTP November 2010 Feature Car. Check it out at:
https://www.motortrend.com/features/...ebird-formula/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abZ1z...ature=youtu.be

Old 02-23-2008 | 06:38 AM
  #39  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

Originally Posted by blu00rdstr
Pretty cool, though your webmaster pasted the story in four times.
Thanks, that webmaster happens to be me... It gets a glitch in there and it keeps duplicating pictures and text. I'll go in and delete it and save it and when I go back it will appear again, sometimes once, sometimes more than that. Maybe someone may have an answer as to why it does this. Bob
Old 02-23-2008 | 06:39 AM
  #40  
EPP's Avatar
EPP
Thread Starter
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by silver95
Bob, that makes me sick. That has more RWHP than my blown LT1 at 3500 RPM!!
I know, it starts making boost very early on. This V is just going to blow the hides right off of it. Bob



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.