Eaton TVS R2300
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...YNO_154043.htm
Its pretty damn impressive and I was just wondering if you guys think the R2300 is really going to surpass the twin screws out there on the market in terms of performance. I am playing with the idea of forced induction and just wanted to start a thread going about it because there doesnt seem to have been much talk about it thus far other than this vid.
Would like to get some opinions/info from some of the more knowledgable guys on the board.
but the TVS is a great step up from the factory heatons. so props to them on that. hell if someone makes a 2.3L TVS kit for the camaro i'll go for it
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
there are a few reasons for this
the twin screw has one slow speed and one high speed rotor.. a typical 5/3 lobe configuration means that if the slow rotor is spinning 15krpm.. the fast one is at 25,000 rpm!! this is the limiting factor for speed/life of the screw type (i always hear of 20,000 rpm screw types.. but not one puts a warranty on it.. lol, i'll let you do the math for how fast the 3 lobe rotor is spinning.. yikes)
for the same bearing life rating.. you can spin the TVS to 25krpm.. and you'd be flowing ALOT more air becasue both rotors spin the same speed, which means both rotors hit their speed limits at the same time..
also, the TVS units are designed to flow alot of air for thier size.. If anyone knows how to actually read a performance map, you'd quickly see that the TVS units are surpassing the twin screw and will outflow it size for size..
GM would have specced the twinscrew (like the high-end Mercedes models) if it wasn't more expensive to produce. Once the aftermarket kicks in, you will see Whipple and Kenne Bell supercharger kits to replace the TVS blowers and people will buy them if they are seeking ultimate performance.
Jim
Last edited by DeltaT; Jun 20, 2008 at 04:55 PM.
I keep hearing its not as efficient as a twin screw but then again I have yet to see any KB2.8s even producing these types of numbers and I think we all agree the little KB2.2 could never produce those numbers
How is this possible??? I just dont get it
Dont get me wrong I've been leaning towards a twin screw or a single turbo, but I want to open this up for discussion to make sure I'm not making a mistake... yyah know missing out on some new profound technology or whatever.
Last edited by Z06PSI; Jun 22, 2008 at 07:36 AM.
That said just exactly WHY is there a difference in efficiency? It really comes down to how much friction and bypass are occuring in the "system". These TVS units look to be sealing VERY well and are moving the air into the manifold very smoothly and hence with surprisingly good efficiency numbers.
The argument that one is a pump (roots types) and the other is a "true" compressor (screw) because it makes boost internally is IMO really semantics. These TVS units are topping 75% adiabatic efficiency. If they are as durable as previous Eaton units this will make a GREAT street option. Other than screws nothing will give the range from off idle to redline that is possible here. I look forward to the screw vs TVS match-ups
With the ZR1 unit having a front intake and drive (and possibly the CTS-V as well ) the aftermarket applications are very appealing.




