Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

whats the difference in a turbo cam and a blower cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2008, 08:54 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02anti_vnm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default whats the difference in a turbo cam and a blower cam

Ok I know nothing about blower or turbo cams is there a difference and what is it thanks guys
Old 08-14-2008, 09:08 PM
  #2  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ok. Here is my NON-TECHNICAL OPINION.

Any cam will obviously work in either. In general, the bigger the cam (duration and lift) the more power it will make, and the higher in the RPMS it will make. Cams with less over lap will "bleed" off more boost than smaller ones. You will hear endless differing opinions about this subject and proponents of standard split duration, reverse splits, and straight patters.

You really need to just make a DETAILED post about your set-up and goals......and then let some of the sponsors of knowledgeable members help you select what's right for YOU.
Old 08-14-2008, 09:24 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
koolaid_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I agree with ninetres, opinions will vary. The turbo cam I installed has exactly the same lift and duration for the intake and the exhaust; the blower cam I removed did not. Some will agree with this approach, some may not.
You may want to start here: https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/327734-cam-guide.html
for a general understanding of cam parameters. But, as the thread suggests, it all boils down to you having to make a decision. Personally, I called Comp Cams and spoke to folk that do it for a living. JMHO.
BOL.
Old 08-15-2008, 07:51 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Not enough testing has been done on turbo setups to really prove what a turbo cam should be anyway.

A few years back, I converted from a supercharger to a turbo. After proving the setup, I removed the supercharger cam (224/236-114) and installed a supposed turbo cam (226/226-114). The car lost power and response, so I put the supercharger cam back in it.

It later occurred to me, what was I thinking??? That reducing duration anywhere on the cam would increase power??? Not unless the cam is WAY out of whack to begin with.

I've said this before and still believe it. The exhaust pressure vs. intake pressure (boost) difference should be key to turbo cam selection. Some setups have the same boost as exhaust pressure, and these should have cams pretty close to NA. Other setups have exhaust pressure 3 times the boost level. Clearly, these cams should be different, but nobody knows in what way exactly.

Mike
Old 08-15-2008, 10:39 AM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,132
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

some of the turbo cams are being ground diff to help spool up
Old 08-18-2008, 08:30 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02anti_vnm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The plan for this build is a forged 355 lt1 with ported and polished stock heads ported matched intake and the turbo system I'm not quite sure about yet I'm just working my way up. The car is mainly just gun a be a show car and weekend driver so it doesn't have to be anything thing extreme maybe like 10 or 12 pounds of boost and try to make 550 plus
Old 08-18-2008, 09:07 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
BLOWNBLUEZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Forney, Texas
Posts: 426
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I had a Lingenfelter GT-7 208/230 121lsa in my Magnuson engine. I changed to the MS4 239/242 111lsa and added an O.D. pulley to spin the blower and lost 10rwhp. Bigger is not always better. The GT-7 is what Lingenfelter uses in the 427TT package. The idea is that the intake charge is forced in, but the exhaust needs help, hence the huge split. Taking away the overlap and putting the cam on a 121 builds cylinder pressure early bringing in the boost early also creating great driveability.
Old 08-18-2008, 09:11 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02anti_vnm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Any good suggestions for this setup?... Specs and where to get the cam at thanks guys
Old 08-18-2008, 09:16 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
BLOWNBLUEZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Forney, Texas
Posts: 426
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

GT-7 is a great cam if you want driveability. Andy at A&A Corvette has a great cam also. Still really nice driveability and bigger than the GT-7. 224/234 117LSA
If you want some nasty lopey boost bleeding cam, I dunno what to tell ya.
Old 08-18-2008, 09:31 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLOWNBLUEZ06
I had a Lingenfelter GT-7 208/230 121lsa in my Magnuson engine. I changed to the MS4 239/242 111lsa and added an O.D. pulley to spin the blower and lost 10rwhp. Bigger is not always better. The GT-7 is what Lingenfelter uses in the 427TT package. The idea is that the intake charge is forced in, but the exhaust needs help, hence the huge split. Taking away the overlap and putting the cam on a 121 builds cylinder pressure early bringing in the boost early also creating great driveability.
You must have had less overall manifold pressure with the MS4 cam.
Old 08-19-2008, 08:05 AM
  #11  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Not enough testing has been done on turbo setups to really prove what a turbo cam should be anyway.
I think there is very little truth in that statement.
Old 08-19-2008, 09:30 AM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
A few years back, I converted from a supercharger to a turbo. After proving the setup, I removed the supercharger cam (224/236-114) and installed a supposed turbo cam (226/226-114).
Based on specs, I would have thought just the opposite since turbos are exhaust driven.
Old 08-19-2008, 10:42 AM
  #13  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Not enough testing has been done on turbo setups to really prove what a turbo cam should be anyway.

A few years back, I converted from a supercharger to a turbo. After proving the setup, I removed the supercharger cam (224/236-114) and installed a supposed turbo cam (226/226-114). The car lost power and response, so I put the supercharger cam back in it.

It later occurred to me, what was I thinking??? That reducing duration anywhere on the cam would increase power??? Not unless the cam is WAY out of whack to begin with.

I've said this before and still believe it. The exhaust pressure vs. intake pressure (boost) difference should be key to turbo cam selection. Some setups have the same boost as exhaust pressure, and these should have cams pretty close to NA. Other setups have exhaust pressure 3 times the boost level. Clearly, these cams should be different, but nobody knows in what way exactly.

Mike
I agree with Mike's comments about duration.
Old 08-20-2008, 02:24 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
02anti_vnm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Any body else got any suggestions for a good cam for this setup?
Old 08-20-2008, 02:29 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1290
I think there is very little truth in that statement.
I beg you to post some test results, then.
Old 08-20-2008, 02:53 PM
  #16  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I beg you to post some test results, then.
+1

I have YET to see a simple cam-swap/dyno-tune before and after thread. Too often cam swaps come with several other changes to really compare two of them.
Old 08-20-2008, 03:04 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ninetres
+1

I have YET to see a simple cam-swap/dyno-tune before and after thread. Too often cam swaps come with several other changes to really compare two of them.
Even if that had been done, it still would only be applicable to that particular backpressure/boost ratio. If it's 3/1, then obviously the results wouldn't apply to an application that was 1/1.
Old 08-20-2008, 03:09 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,600
Received 1,742 Likes on 1,301 Posts

Default

not to argue...but if memory serves me correct.LESS overlap=LESS boost being bled off and MORE overlap=MORE boost being bled.
Old 08-20-2008, 03:35 PM
  #19  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

Goal?
Old 08-20-2008, 07:28 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (33)
 
Z06PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Thomson, GA
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Goal?
Exactly. What do you want to do with your car and how are you going to build it? (Weight, Suspension etc.)

I am about to have a 383 stroker 2.8L Kenne Bell and I already know anything below 80MPH will blow the tires off in any gear except for 6th. I am going to put a nasty so called N/A cam in it to move my power a little further up in the r.p.m. and run a stupid tall gear so I can act like I am a Supra 80 m.p.h. roll racer. Seriously you need to determine what your goal and setup will be in the interim for now or the end build.


Quick Reply: whats the difference in a turbo cam and a blower cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.