Fueling & Injection Fuel Pumps | Injectors | Rails | Regulators | Tanks

New Aeromotive 340 in tank pump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2011 | 07:31 AM
  #61  
wreckwriter's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default

Originally Posted by xXxSilveradoxXx
Well, you'd have a base pressure of 58 psi then you would work up from there.

Base Pressure (58 psi) + Boost Pressure = Fuel Pressure During Boost
Right, but up to what psi?
Old 01-04-2011 | 07:54 AM
  #62  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

You have to deal with maximum pressure abilities of the system, which varies with your HP/fuel consumption. Typically systems operate up to 75psi, but this is only if there is sufficient pumping capacity to maintain this pressure.

On a G8, I start at 58 & boost reference to the pressure side of the inlet tubing. You cannot reference to the intake as engine vacuum lowers the idle pressure & will cause the transfer to stop functioning.

Typically, I recommend a large injector & running a fixed 58psi with no boost reference in these applications. This is the easiest approach as long as you calculate the injector size properly.
Old 01-04-2011 | 08:44 AM
  #63  
wreckwriter's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default

Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
You have to deal with maximum pressure abilities of the system, which varies with your HP/fuel consumption. Typically systems operate up to 75psi, but this is only if there is sufficient pumping capacity to maintain this pressure.

On a G8, I start at 58 & boost reference to the pressure side of the inlet tubing. You cannot reference to the intake as engine vacuum lowers the idle pressure & will cause the transfer to stop functioning.

Typically, I recommend a large injector & running a fixed 58psi with no boost reference in these applications. This is the easiest approach as long as you calculate the injector size properly.
OK, thanks. Plan is this (back to front):

Your pumps
-8 feed line to Aeromotive 12335 Fuel Filter
-8 to Y-block then -8 to rails
-8 from rails to Aeromotive 13101 Regulator A1000
-6 return

HP expected to be around 550-600, injectors are FAST 65#, car is drag race only.

see any glaring issues?

thanks Lonnie!

Tom
Old 01-04-2011 | 02:36 PM
  #64  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Should have no problems at that power level.

Not sure what injector that is....
Is it rated 65# at 43.5psi?
Old 01-04-2011 | 03:18 PM
  #65  
wreckwriter's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default

Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
Should have no problems at that power level.

Not sure what injector that is....
Is it rated 65# at 43.5psi?
Not sure of the rating, its a F.A.S.T. injector, part number 30657.
Old 01-04-2011 | 03:31 PM
  #66  
The Beast's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Originally Posted by JL ws-6
Why would you want to run the car at 90 psi of fuel pressure anyway... from all the flow data that's been presented here, it would seem to me that running between 45 to 60 would be rmoe then adequate, unless you're trying to make up for a lack of injector flow with added pressure (which means you need a bigger injector)

If' I'm missing something please fill me in.
You are. Boost referenced FPR. Anything above 60psi base fuel pressure on a boost referenced FPR car and the 044 is better
Old 01-05-2011 | 09:09 AM
  #67  
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 2
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
Should have no problems at that power level.

Not sure what injector that is....
Is it rated 65# at 43.5psi?
Fast for the LS2/3/7 rate theirs at a 58psi so it makes it easier to compare without using any math.
Old 01-05-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #68  
RedVertTA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 712
Likes: 2
From: Winter Garden, FL
Default

I'm happy everyone is being helped but as a result this thread has gone far off topic.
Old 01-05-2011 | 10:32 AM
  #69  
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 2
From: Lubbock, TX
Default

I am sure that once these things get out there, that the fuelie guys, as well as quite a few of the big names, will have more info. I think we would like to get a few in here to see what they will do. If I get any in, I will keep this thread updated.
Old 01-05-2011 | 01:17 PM
  #70  
qwiketz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!

 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 235
Likes: 1
Default

Are you guys gonna make an online similar to a 392?
Old 01-06-2011 | 11:52 AM
  #71  
bRAZENLS2gOAt's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

subbing.
Old 01-06-2011 | 01:07 PM
  #72  
JL ws-6's Avatar
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by The Beast
You are. Boost referenced FPR. Anything above 60psi base fuel pressure on a boost referenced FPR car and the 044 is better
Simple solution to that, lower the base fuel pressure then....... no need for a ton of pressure when the car's idling/putting around....

Hell we've done cars with the base pressure in 40 lb range... they run fine.
Old 01-07-2011 | 09:47 AM
  #73  
bayer-z28's Avatar
TECH Veteran

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
From: N. Falmouth MA
Default

Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
I'm sure it can be.... but it may not be designed for the application.

What you need to be sure of is that you get a pump with the factory style venturi design so it works properly. I'm not sure this will be an option with this pump. If so great...

The issue that most are missing here is if you do not need a pump this big, why worry about it. Remember pumps do not make ANY horse power, they only support what the engine is capable of. Your 550bhp is not an issue with any good 255 pump.

For reference, the stock pump in an LS1 f-body will typically support 500 crank HP. I've seen many stock ProCharged cars (which are rated at 540 crank) with a stock pump. But I've also seen many need a pump upgrade.

I'm still waiting to get my hands on one of these new 340's to test it out & see if they live up to all the hype.
Good deal then.. I'll leave it alone until I need the bigger pump.

Thank you..
Old 01-08-2011 | 02:22 PM
  #74  
Rick_Vor's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
I run N/A cars at 58 & on forced induction I try to work backwards from the max boost referenced pressure to determine my base pressure. I typically try to design for a max of 65psi at peak boost if possible. This means a car with 20# boost would start at 43.5 base pressure. On cars with very high boost we have lowered base pressure even further with good results.
If you have a system that can adequately support a higher base level + the cooresponding boost, is there any atomization benefit running the higher pressures?
Old 01-08-2011 | 08:22 PM
  #75  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

None that I was ever able to prove. I ran my own car with as low as 30# base fuel pressure & up to 60# with no measurable difference in power.
Old 01-09-2011 | 02:15 AM
  #76  
PokeyGTO's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: BFE, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
I'm still waiting to get my hands on one of these new 340's to test it out & see if they live up to all the hype.
And when you do... I hope you post up your findings, there is a 8.1 bucket that I am getting ready to upgrade (well have you upgrade)
Old 01-09-2011 | 09:59 AM
  #77  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

If you have a GTO, I want your GTO bucket not an 8.1 bucket for dual pumps... You can sell the 8.1 to someone else.

If you want more than the duals can provide, I can also do a triple pump for the GTO as well. Give me a call if you want to disccuss the build in more detail.
Old 01-09-2011 | 11:05 PM
  #78  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

new updates on aero intank pump? price,availabilty?
Old 01-10-2011 | 06:35 AM
  #79  
green95vert's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute,IN
Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
new updates on aero intank pump? price,availabilty?
I'm still curious also. Get a 2nd 044 or go dual Aeromotive 340s...
Old 01-12-2011 | 12:02 PM
  #80  
Gunnar's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City
Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
new updates on aero intank pump? price,availabilty?
From what I've heard, $175 and should be shipping by early February.


Quick Reply: New Aeromotive 340 in tank pump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.