Fueling & Injection Fuel Pumps | Injectors | Rails | Regulators | Tanks

-6AN return line for 1000 WHP E85?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2013 | 08:34 AM
  #1  
schmendog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default -6AN return line for 1000 WHP E85?

Quick question, my factory feed line is -6 AN and Id like to use it as a return line for my 1000 WHP turbo build. Is it big enough?

Thanks.
Old 12-17-2013 | 09:26 PM
  #2  
schmendog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

bump.
Old 12-18-2013 | 02:15 PM
  #3  
68 SS's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee
Default

Most use a -10 feed and a -8 return on high HP builds.
Old 12-18-2013 | 07:52 PM
  #4  
schmendog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

OK, I planned for a -10 feed, I was just hoping the factory -6 could work for the return dammit
Old 12-19-2013 | 02:07 PM
  #5  
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 2
From: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Default

The -6 return will be fine. Look at it this way, if you put a straight through coupler in place of the regulator and ran the fuel pump(s) with the engine not running you are now at maximum possible recirculation. How much pressure would you see at the rail? Probably close to nothing.

Only time return line size could effect fuel system performance is if it was so small it didn't allow the regulator to control pressure at idle. (Say you were going for 43psi base pressure and no matter how far you turned out the regulator pressure wouldn't drop below 50).

If this doesn't happen (and wouldn't with a 3/8 line) then the regulator is the return restriction and going to a bigger return line would serve no purpose.

You could run a -8 feed as well if you want to save some cash over -10.
Old 12-27-2013 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
mike13's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 0
From: Lake Tapps, WA
Default

what's the limit for 8an feed and 6an return on E85?
Old 12-28-2013 | 11:15 AM
  #7  
HexenLord's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 3
Default

-6 AN is enough of a feed line for 99% of the turbo builds on this forum. It will be more than enough for a return line.
Old 12-31-2013 | 10:12 AM
  #8  
Avengeance's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default

I did -10an from pump to rails, split into -8an feeds, then a -8an return with a fuel cooler inline before it went back into the tank. 840rwhp on e85 and 160lb injectors.
Old 12-31-2013 | 11:37 AM
  #9  
Realcanuk's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 360
Likes: 1
From: Montreal
Default

Originally Posted by HexenLord
-6 AN is enough of a feed line for 99% of the turbo builds on this forum. It will be more than enough for a return line.
I agree. You would be amazed how much the line can flow. Way more than most will ever need.
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:07 PM
  #10  
schmendog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by INTMD8
The -6 return will be fine. Look at it this way, if you put a straight through coupler in place of the regulator and ran the fuel pump(s) with the engine not running you are now at maximum possible recirculation. How much pressure would you see at the rail? Probably close to nothing.

Only time return line size could effect fuel system performance is if it was so small it didn't allow the regulator to control pressure at idle. (Say you were going for 43psi base pressure and no matter how far you turned out the regulator pressure wouldn't drop below 50).

If this doesn't happen (and wouldn't with a 3/8 line) then the regulator is the return restriction and going to a bigger return line would serve no purpose.

You could run a -8 feed as well if you want to save some cash over -10.

Thanks for the input, reading on line there is a lot of conflicting ideas on the subject and Ive been under the impression that at an absolute minimum a -10 feed and -8 return was required. Id really like to be able to use the factory -6 AN feed line as a return and save some dough.
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:16 PM
  #11  
luigiandme's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 288
Likes: 1
Default

-6 FEED has been proven for 1000RWHP plenty of times. Not the safest but it does work. Id say -8 feed is fine with a -6 return.
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:21 PM
  #12  
Realcanuk's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 360
Likes: 1
From: Montreal
Default

Originally Posted by schmendog
Thanks for the input, reading on line there is a lot of conflicting ideas on the subject and Ive been under the impression that at an absolute minimum a -10 feed and -8 return was required. Id really like to be able to use the factory -6 AN feed line as a return and save some dough.
Use it. Any one who really knows will tell you its fine. Look at the A1000 system on this page. For up to 1000hp forced induction is recommends a -6 return and a -10 feed.

http://aeromotiveinc.com/wp-content/...werPlanner.pdf
Old 12-31-2013 | 12:54 PM
  #13  
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 45
From: Virginia
Default

your factory feed line is not equivalent to -6, but it will still be fine
Old 12-31-2013 | 02:02 PM
  #14  
schmendog's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

Well **** I thought it was equivalent to -6 AN.
Old 12-31-2013 | 05:31 PM
  #15  
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 45
From: Virginia
Default

Its close!

http://mightym0use.wix.com/mm-solutions



Quick Reply: -6AN return line for 1000 WHP E85?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.