Vp racing fuel
For safety reasons. Fuel could go south... lean... detonation... push a head gasket, maybe even motor damage...
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I think I would rather go the 'safer' route when racing... from 94 to 101 octane. you're not going to see even 1 mph difference in trap speed with the stock tune. Try it, you'll see... The only real test I have ever done was my own car and noticed only a 6hp loss. I would rather spend the extra $20 or so when taking my car to the track for a few runs than even taking a slight risk of getting some bad fuel from a service station. I sell the VP Racing Fuel's MotorSports 101 and Street Blaze for $6.33/gal and $45 for the 5gal with can. You guys act like it's not worth it... I say it's VERY cheap insurance.
If you understand how the combustion cycle works and what octane ratings actually mean....you'd know not to fill up with higher octane.
I run a mix of Sunoco 94 and Sunoco 110 in my car when its not racing on the bottle and straight 110 on the bottle. I might be going to VP 110 though.
You have no need for it honestly unless you plan to play with the timing.
You allways want to run the lowest octane you can get away with and still be safe.
Adding octane to a car that does not need it typicaly slows it down or does it no good.
I would never run premium in my 94 Sunbird but would never run under 93 cruising my BBC.


