Gears & Axles Driveshafts | Rearends | Differentials | Gears | 12 Bolt | 9 Inch | Dana

hawks custom 82-02 8.8 vs quick performance fab 9"

Old 02-02-2018, 07:53 AM
  #41  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Looks like quickperf has some good prices, I just specced a fab 9 out. Interesting. Not sure what kind of repuation for quality they have though.

OP - I too have looked at the hawks 8.8 with a lot of interest. It's lightweight, holds a lot of power and eats up less than any of the "big boy" options. But the price...... If they were selling these things 100% done, soup to nuts for 2 grand it might make sense. I don't recall ho much the one I specced out was but it was right up there with all of the other options. I'm not saying it isn't a viable option, but I'm far from an expert. There is another member on here with whom I Im'd back and forth for a bit talking about them. He has two of them, installed by Hawks and couldn't be happier. His cars are mild though, no 800-900rwhp drag cars.

Midwest Chassis is an active sponsor on here and has a good reputation. They also build a lot of other products for F-bodies so they know their ****. There is that to think about too.
Old 02-02-2018, 08:03 AM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
MidwestChassis2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,504
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Need4Camaro
How much would I be looking at for a Strange S60?
Edit: Found one on Spohn performance. Is the Detroit Trutrac the differential you're referring to? I didn't see the Strange S-Trac.
Starts at $2794.

Strange S60 With S-Trac At Midwest Chassis
Old 02-02-2018, 08:06 AM
  #43  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
MidwestChassis2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,504
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bengtson95
Just checked out midwest chasis s60 with strac.....i really like it, can it come in 3.90?
3.73 to 4.10 is the two gear ratios close to a 3.90. However the rpm changes is minimal between a 3.90 and 4.10 or even the other way around a 3.73 to a 3.90.
Old 02-02-2018, 08:15 AM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
MidwestChassis2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,504
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Need4Camaro
I see, it just loads a blank page for me.

I saw a S60 on Summit Racing and was wondering if this is the same rear end or if there were any differences I need to be aware of (especially in the fitment department).

For the 15 lbs heavier Im almost sure that won't really do anything on a track will it? Would the MWC 9" be just as bullet proof as a Dana S60?
You are not going to notice any power loss going to an aftermarket rear end no matter what it is. You may even see gains like most customers say they get once going to an aftermarket rear end. I would imagine some of that comes from less ring and pinion distortion of the 10-Bolt under acceleration. Our old test mule had just about every style rear end underneath it years ago and ran similar times over and over again but did pick up when we put together a light weight spooled MWC fabricated nine inch.

As for weight the S60 is the heaviest rear end on the market by a lot. Its bulky stature is why it survives better than any other cast style housing. It also has the added feature of being able to mount the torque arm directly to a factory casted in mounting location. No big bulky brackets welded onto a soft cast housing such as the 8.8 or a bracket onto a bracket system like most stamped nine inches. You also have to be careful some claim their nine inch to be a fad nine inch but it is nothing more than a cast nine inch with stuff added to it. A true fabricated nine inch starts out life in multiple pieces.
Old 02-02-2018, 05:17 PM
  #45  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

The Quick Performance 9" is the cheapest rear end I have found for the Gen. 4 F-body. They say that their fabricated housing is about 10lbs less than the stamped housing, and a little stronger.

I haven't ordered one yet, but I priced one out for my car. For $2,700 (shipped), you can get:
-QP 9" fabricated housing
-28-35 spline axles
-1/2" wheel studs
-4-channel ABS/TCS
-Yukon Iron center
-Eaton Tru-trac
-Fully assembled
Old 02-02-2018, 05:19 PM
  #46  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Highly recommend against iron center. The aluminum one is freakin heavy, I could only imagine how much the iron weighs
Old 02-02-2018, 05:21 PM
  #47  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bengtson95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 366
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
The Quick Performance 9" is the cheapest rear end I have found for the Gen. 4 F-body. They say that their fabricated housing is about 10lbs less than the stamped housing, and a little stronger.

I haven't ordered one yet, but I priced one out for my car. For $2,700 (shipped), you can get:
-QP 9" fabricated housing
-28-35 spline axles
-1/2" wheel studs
-4-channel ABS/TCS
-Yukon Iron center
-Eaton Tru-trac
-Fully assembled
cheapest and yet still 2500...man this is an expensive hobby!
Old 02-02-2018, 05:25 PM
  #48  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I'd like to see some real world feedback on that Quick Performance 9. Since its significantly cheaper than the others I'd like hear feedback on things like fitment, quality, completeness, etc.
Old 02-02-2018, 05:26 PM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bengtson95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 366
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have had 4.10s and I felt they were too much, I didn't like being a little over 2k at 65-70. I think I am going to go with the quick performance rear, its within budget (barely/not really) haha, and it should hold no problem for a long time. like I said ill probably be no more than 450rwhp end goal, so I think this rear is a good option.
Old 02-02-2018, 05:26 PM
  #50  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bengtson95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 366
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
I'd like to see some real world feedback on that Quick Performance 9. Since its significantly cheaper than the others I'd like hear feedback on things like fitment, quality, completeness, etc.
this is what I was hoping to get more of from this forum
Old 02-02-2018, 05:30 PM
  #51  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bengtson95
this is what I was hoping to get more of from this forum
Honestly I'd find out more about it before pulling the trigger. It could one of those things you might regret lol
Old 02-02-2018, 05:34 PM
  #52  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bengtson95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 366
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Honestly I'd find out more about it before pulling the trigger. It could one of those things you might regret lol
I already did that with two 10 bolts
Old 02-02-2018, 05:38 PM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bengtson95
I already did that with two 10 bolts
See there you go lol. Sometimes it truly pays to spend a few more bucks to get something that's proven worthy time and time again
Old 02-02-2018, 05:58 PM
  #54  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bengtson95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 366
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
See there you go lol. Sometimes it truly pays to spend a few more bucks to get something that's proven worthy time and time again
you are certainly right about that, after doing a more broad search on quick performance rears in general for other drag cars, they have a very good reputation, didn't find any bad reviews.. so I do believe the reliability and quality is there for sure
Old 02-02-2018, 05:59 PM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bengtson95's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 366
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Highly recommend against iron center. The aluminum one is freakin heavy, I could only imagine how much the iron weighs
which rear is that?
Old 02-02-2018, 06:10 PM
  #56  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Moser cast 9, aluminum center with spool, 35 spline axles, price is competitive with any other cast 9s on the market I believe.
Old 02-02-2018, 07:05 PM
  #57  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bengtson95
you are certainly right about that, after doing a more broad search on quick performance rears in general for other drag cars, they have a very good reputation, didn't find any bad reviews.. so I do believe the reliability and quality is there for sure
Good deal. If you are completely comfortable with it then definitely go for it. That's kind of how I feel about the Strange S60. I've talked to just about every vendor and even a few people personally. The concensus is that its the best overall fitting rear and at this point the best overall option for my wants, needs, and budget
Old 02-02-2018, 07:33 PM
  #58  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
fastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,502
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I went mwc fab 9. For many reasons.
1. How many do you see for sale used? Few and far between. People sale problems and keep what works.
2. Layaway. I started paying right after the end of last season. Paid what I could when I could. Just finished it off and she is two weeks till she is mine.
3. The options. Everything I could have wanted or ask for.
Old 02-03-2018, 12:02 AM
  #59  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,570
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

So in short with the MWC 9" rear would I still be okay in autocrossing or would you recommend a different setup?

Also where can I get a Strange S60 given the previous link didn't work?
Old 02-03-2018, 12:47 AM
  #60  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

You can get the Strange S60 directly through Strange Performance or MWC. The link I posted was from Strange's website.

The MCW 9" would be just fine for autocrossing, but it's probably not the best period. A 10 bolt would probably be better for just pure autocrossing

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: hawks custom 82-02 8.8 vs quick performance fab 9"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM.