Pinion Angle please help
Neg. angle is pinion pointing down. With what you discribed above, DS at 2 and the pinion/rear at -5 (pointing down) your at -3 now. Adjust the pinion up, checking both sides until they are in the range you want. The DS will move or change too, that's why you need to go back and forward until the difference is -2 to -3. I run -2.5.
Remember, it's the total angle, not just the pinion angle.
Think abour it. Our cars come from the factory with zero deg of pinion angle on the stock TA. With the DS sloping down by nature, you could never get a pinion angle that would be zero without a negative number. You would always have the DS angle that is not zero plus some other number.
This is the way I have seen this done ad what BMR explained when I bought the adjustable TA.
The other way I have set this is to use my subframe connectors to find zero degrees. Using the subframes takes out the element of "is the car 100% level". Then set the pinion 2 deg down rrom that number. Comes out the same.
<small>[ October 21, 2002, 02:42 PM: Message edited by: Steve Burger ]</small>
from the passenger side measure you want the needle to the left 2 deg. of the drveshaft.
from the drivers side , you want the needle 2 deg. to the right of the driveshaft angle.
Trending Topics
from the passenger side measure you want the needle to the left 2 deg. of the drveshaft.
from the drivers side , you want the needle 2 deg. to the right of the driveshaft angle. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Finally someone said it where it is very easy even for me. Yes it was about seven degrees to the right of the other number from the driver's side. I did adjust it and for now I have it on the same as the other number since I was'nt exactly sure which way to go. I will adjust it soon.
By the way will me having -2degrees pinion angle help me get better traction off of the line? with it set at zero I was still spinning my ET streets yesterday.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I guess I just dont understand how they can both be negative if they are on the opposite sides of zero. I don't know I will keep adjusting I guess.
<small>[ October 21, 2002, 12:01 PM: Message edited by: Chad00ws6 ]</small>
The DS sloping downwards towards the rear by 5 degrees (That's ALOT if that's correct!) and the pinion sloping downwards towards the front by 2 degrees total together to make -7 degrees of pinion angle (the pinion angle is the difference in the angle between the DS and itself which is what is confusing ya'll. You're taking "difference" to mean subtract the 5 from the 2 or the 2 from the 5, etc... That's not right. You simply add the difference of each from horizontal together to get the difference between DS angle and pinion angle. In this case we have 2 and 5 = -7 degrees which is WAAAAAAAAY too much if this was measured accurately. Shoot for -1 to -2.5, IMO.
As mentioned before, these measurements should be taken ONLY with the car level and with normal driving weight being supported by the rearend.
<small>[ October 21, 2002, 12:23 PM: Message edited by: Colonel ]</small>
again
2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5
there are 7 spaces there = 7 degrees or a difference of 7.. however you want to see it, it will always be a difference of 7!!
Here is the reason. Zero deg of Pinion angle is optimum for acceleration. But power tends to take the path of least resistance. If you think about it the easiest thing for the pinion to do is walk up the ring gear under power. The next easiest thing is for the pinion to twist the rear end or plant the passenger side tire harder. Under light acceleration this is minimal and that is why the zero deg pinion angle from the factory. Under very hard acceleration like in drag racing, a negative pinion angle will allow the pinion to walk a little and get back to around zero. Too much negative pinion angle will place the pinion out of phase with the rest of the power train at any acceleration rate and bind the U joint.
I run -2 on the street and -2 to -3 at the track.
I hope this helps.
<small>[ October 22, 2002, 01:13 PM: Message edited by: Reckless ]</small>


