Gen 5 Camaro Power-Adder Tech Supercharger, Turbo, Nitrous

Single Turbo 2010 Camaro SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2009, 09:49 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FastSSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Single Turbo 2010 Camaro SS

Have you guys seen this Camaro yet? I am thinking about getting this turbo kit for mine. Everyone told me that you guys were knowledgeable and for me to come over here from Camaro5 to ask you what you think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvsueXv4snM
Old 08-23-2009, 02:06 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
jamnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay St. Louis, Ms
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't know anything about that particular turbo kit, but I'm going to have mine fabbed up by one of the Board vendors. I'm also looking into starting off with a T-6 flange so I have room to grow on once I build my motor. That way if I decide to go massive turbo, I may be able to get away with just swapping the turbo & DP.
Old 08-23-2009, 04:28 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FastSSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It seems to be a well put together kit and they are selling it for $5995. It has a T4 flanged turbo so you could fit up to a GT47R which is good for 1200whp. I can't imagine you going for more than that. There is a huge thread on the camaro5 forum if you wanted to see about it. I don't know everything about turbos but it looks good to me.
Old 08-23-2009, 08:41 AM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (15)
 
JayplaySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, OH
Posts: 4,615
Received 161 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

IMHO, you're going to need 600rwhp+ to be a threat with them. Sweet kit though, it just needs to get between 600-650rwhp.
Old 08-23-2009, 08:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
jamnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay St. Louis, Ms
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FastSSCamaro
It seems to be a well put together kit and they are selling it for $5995. It has a T4 flanged turbo so you could fit up to a GT47R which is good for 1200whp. I can't imagine you going for more than that. There is a huge thread on the camaro5 forum if you wanted to see about it. I don't know everything about turbos but it looks good to me.
You never know when you need to go THUMPER. Also I'm sure the boost wasn't turned up all the way. I would like to see 600 rwhp & just drive it to destruction, then build a hardened motor.
Old 08-23-2009, 08:53 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
fattyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dude that is freaking sweet!
Old 08-23-2009, 10:27 PM
  #7  
Teching In
 
Evo8You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Been folllowing them alot on another forum.. Nice kit. T04Z 530whp..
Old 08-23-2009, 10:55 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (19)
 
LawmanSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jamnut
You never know when you need to go THUMPER. Also I'm sure the boost wasn't turned up all the way. I would like to see 600 rwhp & just drive it to destruction, then build a hardened motor.
They are running 8.5 psi of boost to obtain the 530 rwhp/550 rwtq. They are also reporting IAT's of 109F at redline during their dyno pulls.
Old 08-24-2009, 02:47 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
jamnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay St. Louis, Ms
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LawmanSS
They are running 8.5 psi of boost to obtain the 530 rwhp/550 rwtq. They are also reporting IAT's of 109F at redline during their dyno pulls.

I wonder what the true drive train loss is through the A6 & IRS? I would guess that @ 8.5 psi & IAT's of 109 that it would be around 600 rwhp through an M6.
Old 08-24-2009, 09:45 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
jksstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default


Last edited by jksstar; 08-24-2009 at 09:54 AM.
Old 08-24-2009, 10:38 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
Evo8You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamnut
I wonder what the true drive train loss is through the A6 & IRS? I would guess that @ 8.5 psi & IAT's of 109 that it would be around 600 rwhp through an M6.
Yeah that could probably happen with a bigger turbo.

8.5psi from different turbo's provide very different results.
Old 08-24-2009, 11:02 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
HumanNipple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 519
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

That is seriously awesome, but did you guys look at the stock WHP? holy **** only 314whp????? The tq was like 311...I sure hope that particular dyno just reads really low.
Old 08-24-2009, 11:19 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
jerseymike68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is serious problem
Old 08-25-2009, 06:17 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FastSSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was an automatic L99 car, mine only dynoed 320whp on a dynojet. There is a lot of drivetrain loss on these cars.
Old 08-25-2009, 06:19 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FastSSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jamnut
I wonder what the true drive train loss is through the A6 & IRS? I would guess that @ 8.5 psi & IAT's of 109 that it would be around 600 rwhp through an M6.
They said that on a M6 it would be about 3% higher numbers on it.
Old 08-25-2009, 12:34 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
RJB01camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Largo,FL
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FastSSCamaro
It was an automatic L99 car, mine only dynoed 320whp on a dynojet. There is a lot of drivetrain loss on these cars.
Thats really low even for a Auto. Was it on a mustang dyno?
Old 08-25-2009, 06:24 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Thats a little turbo but,...effective.
Old 08-26-2009, 10:21 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
hc8719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For $6000 there are so many other things you could do and get more horsepower. How much does a full exhaust system bump the horepower up to alone?
Old 08-26-2009, 05:31 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FastSSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would disagree. For $6000 dollars you can have over 700 whp. Besides a crazy shot of nitrous, I don't know what else you could get for that price that would give you that much bolt on horsepower.


Many people have made high 600's to low 700's with that turbo to the wheels.

Remember that is on an automatic on wastegate springs (8.5 psi) that's actually the lowest horsepower it will possibly make.
Old 08-26-2009, 09:06 PM
  #20  
Launching!
 
Adam Connell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hc8719
For $6000 there are so many other things you could do and get more horsepower. How much does a full exhaust system bump the horepower up to alone?
Are you serious?

No, for $6,000 there is NOTHING that will out perform a properly tuned turbo setup... They are not even pushing this setup at 8.5psi... add a little methanol injection and you could easily see numbers in the low 700s... this is on a STOCK engine... add a cam and expect another 75-100hp at that level. Either way they are leaving a lot on the table with only 8.5 psi, but I can understand why they dont turn it up... 8.5 is a safe number to advertise.

The reason why the turbo is "small" is that it's designed to be a street friendly setup... There is no sense in putting a 1000fwhp capable turbo on a car that will never break 800, all you're doing is making the car a turd... From the videos, this setup sounds very well matched for a stock engined car. Contrary to popular belief, bigger is not better when it comes to turbos. A matching combo is the most important part of a turbo setup, and this one appears to be right on the money.


Quick Reply: Single Turbo 2010 Camaro SS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.