Mustang guys getting scared...
Kind of funny one guy even says "Gt500 beats SS no problem, just like SS beats GT, just like GT beats Camaro 6 cylinder"... What they are talking **** about beating six cylinder camaro's now? WOW
While everyone's got an opinion, I do hope those are not average. A crummy interior will turn off a lot of potential v6 buyers- that is, non-hardcore performance fans.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

Not being a fanboy here or defending anything or anyone.......just setting the facts straight.
I built one on GM's website with 2SS, engine cover, stripes, and polished rims. The price was $35,400 before TTT. With 0 down and current rates on a 60 month loan, that put the payment over $700 per month. Thanks, but no thanks. That's a little too rich for my blood. I'm sure many on here will be in the same boat.
Last edited by firechicken_98; Mar 19, 2009 at 07:51 PM.
?
The "track pak" is mild compared to my setup.Upgrading the suspension on this S197 has been the most fullfulling thing I've done to a car in a long time. Hella fun.
for every upgrade you do, you realize it has revealed another weak point in the factory parts. These cars are so underengineered it's pathetic.
The only "numbers" where the Camaro dominated was in acceleration (0-60, 1/4 mile). The GT was neck n neck with it in braking tests........some mags had the GT coming out ahead, others did better with the Camaro. The GT put up the better skid pad numbers, and the GT and Camaro were neck n neck again for slalom passes. Those are the only "numbers" that these test listed results for. Everything else was about driving impressions of the three. The Challenger was the softest, most cruiser like. The Mustang was the most raw, old school like. And the Camaro was the most balanced overall in performance, comfort, etc.I've read/watched just about all the 3 way comparisons that I could find on the net....and the results are usually along these same lines.


