Pretty balanced look at the SS
06-19-2009, 02:31 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty balanced look at the SS http://www.motorauthority.com/not-re...camaro-ss.html
I think they do a decent job of weighing the cons against the pros.
And I agree, if you get one, it has to be the six-speed. That's where it's really at.
I think they do a decent job of weighing the cons against the pros.
And I agree, if you get one, it has to be the six-speed. That's where it's really at.
06-19-2009, 04:30 PM
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Both tranny options are a 6spd in this car, also I thought the A6 was hardly any slower then the M6? Have yet to see a real test with an A6...plus with the less HP its only common sense that it would be slower for sure, tune out the active fuel management and you have the same motor as the M6 car.
06-19-2009, 07:29 PM
#5
06-20-2009, 01:16 AM
#7
I think the author did a pretty good job on the Camaro. He dismissed the A6 to quickly, especially considering it sounds like he NEVER drove one. Yes the back seat in the Camaro is standard early Camaro fair.......it is really a two seater with a place to put your coats. To call the Mustang's back set a catherdal???? He has NEVER sat in the back seat of the S197 Mustang......dude a catherdal has a high roof which the Mustang lacks in spades, it is the Challenger that has a backseat (it better with what it weights).
