

















How long will it last????
99 LS1 Auto got 17/24 by old rating, new rating is 15/23
99 LS1 manual got 19/28 by old rating, new rating is 17/26
99 V6 manual 19/30 by old rating, new rating is 17/28
99 V6 auto 19/29 by old rating, new rating is 17/26
so its a 2mpg difference.
so we have 100 more hp and weigh an extra 400lbs now and about 2mpg less on the manual and the auto should be better than the LS1. V6 is about the same with 100 more hp.
how can you complain about that???
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Sad becasue if it is a failure.... it will probably be the end of the Camaro nameplate. Last edited by wabmorgan; Jul 28, 2008 at 11:04 PM.
how was the 4th gen overpriced? the msrp was within 2,000 of the mustang GT when it hit its demise. Offering an *** load more performance. Im not sure why it didnt sell.
you should really look up some facts on things before you post. 98% of what you say is incorrect assumptions based on nothing but your hate of the camaro and what you have read on biased mustang forums.
who doesn't know 4th gen ls1's were underrated?? you don't think LS3's are underrated also? they put down about 380rwhp stock, so thats 80rwhp more than an ls1 = ~100fwhp
I do enjoy how everyone gets so quick to be defensive about the car. It's an internet forum. Just cause this is a GM forum doesn't mean you have to automatically love everything that comes off the line. People are entitled to not like the car. If you can't handle an opinion other than yours you don't belong on the internet. Those who like the car should be able to share that opinion without someone who doesn't like the car giving them ****, and the other way around if someone doesn't like the car they should be able to feel that way too without someone acting like you just slapped their girlfriend.
Some of the early posts are old so I don't know if the production vehicle specifics were out yet, but from what I read in Motor Trend the two V6s will have the CTS 300hp V6 in them. The SS model will have two engines available (close Hp and Torque numbers though) L99, if I remember correctly, for the A6 and LS3 for the M6 (the M6 having about 20-30 more hp). The SS engines will have 395-430 hp. The Z-28 is supposed to be supercharged and compete with the GT 500, so I'm assuming around 500-550 hp.
Also, the prices are going to be competitive with the Mustang, Challenger, and 350Z. All of these vehicles were used by GM to do comperative testing and word from GM is that they all paled in comparison (whatever that means). So this means that the SS should be around $28k to $32k. Not a bad price I think for a new SS camaro. To answer the comment about Corvette owners, Corvettes are at least $10k more than the Camaro brand new and thats low balling it. If anything, I think the Corvette owners will buy a new Camaro because it's new and will be exclusive, at least for a while. You also have to think about all the rich guys who are buying these 67-69 camaros for $50k-$100k who will likely buy a new Camaro just to have it sit in the garage next to the 67-69 model.
As far as styling goes, I like it. I think putting the new Camaro in the "Retro" box may be a little incorrect. The siloutte of the Camaro is retro, but most of the styling is new, unlike the Challenger and Mustang which look pretty close to the originals. I understand that the Camaro is being called retro by everyone including GM, but personally I think it is more like retro inspired than retro looking.
As far as the Mustang sells go, I think they were really high because it was the first "retro" styled car in production. As much as I hate to admitt it, they did a good job too. Overall, I still like the sleek look of the 4th gen F-bods over the box/angular shape of the new retro vehicles.
P.S. Nothing and I mean nothing compares to the mean look of a WS6 trans am getting closer to you in the rear view mirror.
