General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Pontiac G8 GT FIREHAWK Article including performance!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2009, 09:34 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Pontiac G8 GT FIREHAWK Article including performance!

Not sure if everyone has seen this but below is a link where you can read up on the new Firehawk from Pontiac.. Thing is going to be fast for a 4door

http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-new...t-ar70933.html
Old 03-26-2009, 10:02 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Not sold on that
Old 03-26-2009, 10:09 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Feli Murillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know about that 4 door.
Old 03-26-2009, 10:09 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What dont you like about it? The color performance or what?
Old 03-26-2009, 10:10 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Feli Murillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by demarco313
What dont you like about it? The color performance or what?
The 4 doors.
Old 03-26-2009, 10:14 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea i agree. 4 doors does suck but 0-60 in 4.3 secs for a 4door is impressive. only 1 or 2 tenths behind the cts-v which is 556hp.
Old 03-26-2009, 10:16 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
fccs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Waste, its a g8 not a trans am. SLP needs to get their heads out of there asses. I could go buy a ******* c6 vette for the price that can be had for..
Old 03-26-2009, 10:18 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
 
Lethal Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Somebody explain to me again why they quit making the F-body? I mean I guess its cool to have a 4 dr hp monster. Dodge has the SRT-8 line up. But why was the F-body dropped in the first place. At the very least Pontiac should have kept the Trans-am.
Old 03-26-2009, 10:23 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea i agree they shouldve kept the trans-am. DOnt know why they dropped it
Old 03-26-2009, 10:25 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SlowFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DC Suburbs
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lethal Z
Somebody explain to me again why they quit making the F-body? I mean I guess its cool to have a 4 dr hp monster. Dodge has the SRT-8 line up. But why was the F-body dropped in the first place. At the very least Pontiac should have kept the Trans-am.
I believe sales had something to do with it. The sales for the F body sucked so GM stopped making them. IIRC the Camaro always sold better than the t/a anyway.

As for it being a waste, you could buy a c6 for the money but could you haul 4 people in the c6 and luggace for a cross country road trip? The G8 isn't marketed to the same people as the c6 so that point is irrelevant for GM.

I think the car looks ugly (the firehawk pains scheme, I think regular G8s look good) but for the performance I would get one. It would definately surprise some m5 owners.
Old 03-26-2009, 10:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SlowFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DC Suburbs
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just noticed it had 8" wide wheels with little 245 width tires, traction has to be really hard to come by. With some traction I bet it would trap close to 120 and run low 12s if not high 11s.
Old 03-26-2009, 10:31 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
demarco313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlowFRC
I just noticed it had 8" wide wheels with little 245 width tires, traction has to be really hard to come by. With some traction I bet it would trap close to 120 and run low 12s if not high 11s.

exactly!!... and i actually like the color scheme
Old 03-26-2009, 11:24 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
MattxFatal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tampa Fl bitches.
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default


Last edited by MattxFatal; 03-26-2009 at 11:29 PM.
Old 03-27-2009, 12:18 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

SLP can go get bent for a $18k upcharge on the G8 GT for this package. Putting the "Firehawk" name on the G8 is retarded.
Old 03-27-2009, 12:27 AM
  #15  
Launching!
 
96autoformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default the reason they dropped the T/A

Pontiac isn't making the Trans Am because Chevrolet wants to be able to say that the Camaro outsells the mustang. The same thing that annoys them about Ford saying (and truthfully so) that the F150 is the best selling domestic full size truck is what caused this as well. GM wouldn't like to have to say that the F-body out sells the Mustang, so get rid of one, and you can hopefully say the camaro outsells the mustang. Simple sales pitch.
As for Firehawk on anything but a Firebird, I'm not a huge fan. Can I get a G8 Judge anyone?
Old 03-27-2009, 12:51 AM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Mean87SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

stupid.
Old 03-27-2009, 01:40 AM
  #17  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

There was already a huge backlash about this. But somehow SLP is still under the illusion that it's getting "great feedback". Even though, none seems to exist.
Old 03-27-2009, 01:41 AM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (51)
 
jcobra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Louis Area
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow an extra 20,000 dollars for a 12.6 quater mile time ??? I think those run like 13.4 or somthing stock. If i REALLY wanted a fast 4 door G8 i would just throw in a stall, headers, gears and intake and be just as fast (Probably Faster) For a just a few thousand dollars.

I Can't believe SLP is doing something this stupid.
Old 03-27-2009, 10:28 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
waldershrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not this again......
Old 03-27-2009, 10:33 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
qwk93ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fairfield, Ohio
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

SLP is making a mistake, 18k on top of the original purchase price.....NO WAY.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.