2010 Camaro SS on the dyno at New Era!
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 Camaro SS on the dyno at New Era!
A customer stopped by today with a new Camaro SS. It looked awesome. We strapped it down on the on the dyno at about 3:00 and made a baseline pull with it. It made 366rwhp and 372rwtq.
Here are some pics (more are coming shortly!!!)
Here are some pics (more are coming shortly!!!)
Trending Topics
#8
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was a stage 2 SS also. Sorry about leaving that out.
#9
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
426-63.9=362.1
366>362.1....
at a 15% drivetrain loss it actually made MORE than what it should have... how could you expect a LOT more?
using the same math for torque it *should* make 374, but this car made 2 ft-lbs less. After some break in miles i would bet it would make better numbers than that.
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (59)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't say I like the wheels, but I also can't say I could afford one (of the wheels, let alone the car). Am I the only one that finds the engine compartment to be more sexy WITHOUT the big cover thing? Sweeeet ride none the less. I look forward to seeing them cruising around in the near future.
#14
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't say I like the wheels, but I also can't say I could afford one (of the wheels, let alone the car). Am I the only one that finds the engine compartment to be more sexy WITHOUT the big cover thing? Sweeeet ride none the less. I look forward to seeing them cruising around in the near future.
#15
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts