General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Is my car under powered?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2018, 03:57 PM
  #21  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 177 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

If the fuel pump hasn't been changed yet, start there. It's easier to just change the pump than to find a pressure gauge for it.
Old 06-13-2018, 01:07 AM
  #22  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,361
Likes: 0
Received 1,792 Likes on 1,277 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
If the fuel pump hasn't been changed yet, start there. It's easier to just change the pump than to find a pressure gauge for it.
I would recommend exactly the opposite of this.
Old 06-13-2018, 06:05 AM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
 
98CayenneT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: White Bear, Mn
Posts: 3,898
Received 356 Likes on 247 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I would recommend exactly the opposite of this.
Same here.
Check fuel pressure

I had zero problem spinning my tires at will from a stop when I had a stock 2.73 car.
Old 06-13-2018, 05:04 PM
  #24  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 177 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

A fuel pump and a fuel pressure gauge/kit cost about the same. If you check the fuel pressure first, you will see that you need a new fuel pump. The end result is the same either way.
Old 06-13-2018, 08:01 PM
  #25  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,361
Likes: 0
Received 1,792 Likes on 1,277 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
A fuel pump and a fuel pressure gauge/kit cost about the same. If you check the fuel pressure first, you will see that you need a new fuel pump. The end result is the same either way.
For the record, I'll just say that I categorically disagree with the flawed logic behind this general advice (especially based on the details of the OP's specific instance). But, to each his own.
Old 06-14-2018, 11:51 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
kbronSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Imperial Valley, CA
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I see a lot of people talking about 2.73 but for the record i wanna make it clear my car has 3.23 which would make my situation a bit worse i believe.
Old 06-14-2018, 05:09 PM
  #27  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,361
Likes: 0
Received 1,792 Likes on 1,277 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kbronSS
I see a lot of people talking about 2.73 but for the record i wanna make it clear my car has 3.23 which would make my situation a bit worse i believe.
Either way, the earlier advice in this thread is still spot on - checking fuel pressure under load and making sure the MAF is at least clean (with no physical intake blockage either) are great first steps if you think there is a power problem. But, keeping in mind that there's also a recent header install in the mix, it could be related to poor O2 sensor operation as well (already fatigued sensors getting worse since being moved to the headers or an exhaust leak somewhere near or before the sensors causing false readings, to name a couple). You could look at some additional data (such as fuel trims, etc.) if you have access to a comprehensive scanner.
Old 06-15-2018, 02:42 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
kbronSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Imperial Valley, CA
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Guess im in the need of a dyno tune.
Old 06-20-2018, 10:38 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Count of Monte Crlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Longwood, FL
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Strange that we'd have such different experiences with generally the same car. When stock, my 2.73 '98 would even squeal them a bit if shocked hard from up to a 5-10mph roll, and that was with brand new 275mm BFG KDW tires on a 9" wide wheel. From a stop, an equally hard shock would result in significant traction loss. Things didn't really change in this regard with the addition of an air lid and catback. My 2.73 '02 generally experienced the same traction loss from a stop, but did grip better from a very slow roll (also on 275mm BFGs, though these wheels were a bit heavier and wider at 9.5").
This is right on. I have 3.23. similar bolt on mods, and 10.5" wide wheel in the rear and from a dead stop if I mash on the gas I'm spinning hard for a long time until I lift some. If I hit it from a roll around 15-20 I still have a little traction loss, but not too bad. From a 5-10 roll it will still break traction pretty hard. Even with a higher mph roll, sometimes if the trans downshifts hard it can get a bit squirrely. Even at just shifting gears normally under WOT it tries to break traction sometimes without a hard downshift or anything. So I think you definitely have an issue somewhere.
Old 12-14-2018, 01:54 AM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
hurley711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Waking up a 6 month old thread on the night shift wondering if this was ever resolved?
Old 12-15-2018, 07:52 AM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

"is my car underpowered?"

Yes, yes it is.




Quick Reply: Is my car under powered?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.