General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

stock horsepower rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2007, 04:58 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CAMAROZ28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default stock horsepower rating

2002 z28 on ebay says that the stock horsepowers 325? i thought it was 305 for the Z28's and 325 for the SS. anyone know?
Old 06-13-2007, 04:59 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
 
shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its 310 for the 02's like z28 and regular t/a
Old 06-13-2007, 05:00 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

All LS1s came with 350hp.

The exact same LS1 in the 350hp vette is the exact same LS1 that was put in the f-bodies and GTO.

Exact w/ minor differences such as oil pan for different k-member and some different accessories.

The engine internals/cams were the same.
Old 06-13-2007, 05:01 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CAMAROZ28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH FLORIDA
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what about the 2002 WS6 and 2002 SS
Old 06-13-2007, 05:02 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

All LS1s came with ~350hp.

All. No difference from z28 to SS or Formula to T/A to WS6.

No difference.
Old 06-13-2007, 09:46 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
PhillyCamaro16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to clarify . . It is 350 horse 365 torque at the crank and 310 horse 325 torque to the wheels -- this is Chevy's ratings !! If you dyno one of these cars those numbers probably wont be your exact numbers -- they'll be in the ballpark though. This is for 02' cars also.



You lose more with an A4 than a M6 also ..
Old 06-13-2007, 10:03 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Blue's_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 77089
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've been interested in this subject as well. I was told the LS1 in the 01 and 02's that are in the f-bodies had a different cam than that that was used in the vette. Is there any hard data on the true dyno of these engines?
Old 06-13-2007, 10:29 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blue's_Z28
I've been interested in this subject as well. I was told the LS1 in the 01 and 02's that are in the f-bodies had a different cam than that that was used in the vette. Is there any hard data on the true dyno of these engines?
The differences were because the vettes didn't come with air or egr.

The power difference is negligible.
Old 06-14-2007, 10:28 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
LS1W66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

`98-`00 Corvette and F-body LS1's did have different cams but there was no power difference to speak of.
`01-`04 LS1's are all the same internally no matter which car they were installed in.
Old 06-14-2007, 10:34 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
MSDRbooger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southaven, MS
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

see sig
Old 06-14-2007, 10:44 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
 
GregAbell60143's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And the cars with the manual trans won't have the losses like an auto, so they will be a little bit higher.

My 2002 Camaro SS Convertible had the 345HP package from SLP when I ordered the car (Donaldson Blackwing lid and Dual-Dual cat-back exhaust). BONE-STOCK, on Speed Inc's dyno: 319.72 HP & 339.42 TQ (I even left my dirty air-filter in - a new filter might have read even higher).


Stock 2002 Z28 and SS cars were "RATED" 325HP, and the SS cars had the SLP options available (sincle SLP is the place where the Z28 cars were made into the SS: 335HP - just the cat-back & 345HP like mine - lid and cat-back)

Last edited by GregAbell60143; 06-14-2007 at 10:58 AM.
Old 06-14-2007, 12:55 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Torque_Wrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In the Sticks of Virginia
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Justin00SS
All LS1s came with 350hp.

The exact same LS1 in the 350hp vette is the exact same LS1 that was put in the f-bodies and GTO.

Exact w/ minor differences such as oil pan for different k-member and some different accessories.

The engine internals/cams were the same.
...Justin00SS is exactly right!! I work for GM and every single LS1 produced, makes 350HP at the flywheel! No matter if it was a Z28, a SS or what! This has been a highly debated topic for years. But I can assure you that they all make 350HP.
Old 06-14-2007, 08:10 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
'02DirtyBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just curious, if they make 350 then why do they advertise them at lower HP. For example they say my '02 WS6 is 325. Why wouldn't they just say 350?
Old 06-14-2007, 08:12 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Because it looks bad for a $40k vette to have the same power rating as a $25k camaro/firebird.

GM has don't this for years.
Old 06-14-2007, 08:18 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Blue's_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 77089
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info on all who responded!
Old 06-14-2007, 08:45 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Justin00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

When the GN came out the vette had a top speed of 85mph. The GN was the fastest car GM made at the time but it was way underrated because the vette is GM's flagship car.
Old 06-14-2007, 08:55 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
tjswanson2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oneida, IL
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The best thing about the 01 and 02 F-bodies is the LS6 intake manifold and no EGR
Old 06-15-2007, 12:51 PM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Torque_Wrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In the Sticks of Virginia
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '02DirtyBird
Just curious, if they make 350 then why do they advertise them at lower HP. For example they say my '02 WS6 is 325. Why wouldn't they just say 350?
Insurance standards and the biggest reason is.......the Gas Guzzler Tax. Dealers and GM would pay through the nose if all LS1 vehicles were to be charged with the Gas Guzzler tax like the GTO's had put on them because they advertised a 350HP rating.
Old 06-15-2007, 02:52 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
99HorseSlayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Land of the Old
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Justin00SS
Because it looks bad for a $40k vette to have the same power rating as a $25k camaro/firebird.

GM has don't this for years.
man I bet that pisses off vette owners
Old 06-15-2007, 04:11 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
Shooter_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's the same motor, but different exhaust systems and intake lid. I'm thinking my z had somewhere over 310 stock, but with adding the borla and lid, I must be up around 350. I agree they all have the same 350 hp engine, but crappy intake and exhaust can definitely drain you of 30+hp.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.