General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Stock: LS1 F-Body vs. LS2 GTO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:22 PM
  #1  
Speedmonster185's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette/West Lafayette, IN
Default Stock: LS1 F-Body vs. LS2 GTO

I've been curious about this for a while now... I have a '00 WS6, and my brother is planning on buying an '05-'06 GTO, and I've been wondering how they compare. As far as I knew, the GTOs were at least the same, or a little faster than the Fbodies. Is that right? Or am I thinking wrong? I just met this other guy the other day that makes me doubt myself. He said he thought that the GTOs were really slow. He told my brother that and then he got mad at me because he thought I was feeding him a line about his car being as fast as mine stock so that he would go buy a slower car..... lol . So what's the truth guys?
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:25 PM
  #2  
Gaunt's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: anozirA
Default

ummm, this type of thread has been put up a bunch of times :/

LS2 gtos put about 400 flywheel HP.... so... do the math and figure out where your car stacks up to his stock 400 flywheel HP
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:26 PM
  #3  
streetassasin's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 1
From: Orange, TX
Default

the gto's weight alot more than f-bodies
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:27 PM
  #4  
Sharpe's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,996
Likes: 1
From: Southeastern IL
Default

Beat to death, dug up, beat some more.

It's a driver's race.
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:28 PM
  #5  
LivingCanvas's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

In my experience, its a drivers race.
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:30 PM
  #6  
night ghost's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 330
Likes: 1
Default

usually a drivers race
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:33 PM
  #7  
5301113's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
Default

Originally Posted by Gaunt
ummm, this type of thread has been put up a bunch of times :/

LS2 gtos put about 400 flywheel HP.... so... do the math and figure out where your car stacks up to his stock 400 flywheel HP
05-06 400 hp GTO 3900 pounds stock
2000 320 hp WS6 3600 pounds stock

Close race because of the weight difference
GTO mit win by two lengths

Last edited by 5301113; 10-23-2007 at 01:34 PM. Reason: add
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:34 PM
  #8  
5301113's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
Default

driver race
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:35 PM
  #9  
Cantalope Kid's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

I have beaten several (Jelly beans) GTO's. Its just too bloody heavy even with the additional power. Usually pull away from them VERY slowly though. Think of it this way...your buddy is buying a new expensive AUTO LOAN BILL and you have an older MAINTENANCE/HEAVY MODIFICATION OPTION, who do you think will win? I would rather not be paying my car payment and putting the money towards mods.
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:36 PM
  #10  
Gaunt's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: anozirA
Default

Originally Posted by 5301113
05-06 400 hp GTO 3900 pounds stock
2000 320 hp WS6 3600 pounds stock

Close race because of the weight difference
GTO mit win by two lengths
you put it best, so not much more to elaborate on

Driver's race

I didn't really catch the fact that both cars were stock, just that the GTO was stock.
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:38 PM
  #11  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,396
Likes: 1,819
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Default

Originally Posted by 5301113
05-06 400 hp GTO 3900 pounds stock
2000 320 hp WS6 3600 pounds stock

Close race because of the weight difference
GTO mit win by two lengths
The WS6 is more like 350hp stock, just like every other LS1 from '97-'04. So it's only about a 50hp difference.
Old 10-23-2007 | 01:38 PM
  #12  
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,955
Likes: 30
From: Rotonda West Florida
Default

Yea this has been posted a billion times...The LS2 has more hp but the differance in weight pretty much evens it up...
Old 10-23-2007 | 02:10 PM
  #13  
Speedmonster185's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette/West Lafayette, IN
Default

I realize the hp and weight difference, but ET-wise, which one is on average faster at the track stock? That is what I'm curious about.

Also, I just thought of something else. Do the LS2's respond even better to mods than the LS1? Like the LS1 compared to the LT1 before it? Or are they close enough in technology that they respond very similarly?
Old 10-23-2007 | 02:12 PM
  #14  
sstony's Avatar
11 Second Club

 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee,FL
Default

if looking for a newer RWD domestic v-8 car, the only ones that cross my mind are the GTO and stang. The GTO interior is way nice and comfortable especially for a large person. but i feel there weight hurts the car more than anything.

but i agree with the masses about it being a driver's race with an fbody and GTO
Old 10-23-2007 | 02:33 PM
  #15  
5301113's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Odessa TX
Default

Originally Posted by Speedmonster185
I realize the hp and weight difference, but ET-wise, which one is on average faster at the track stock? That is what I'm curious about.

Also, I just thought of something else. Do the LS2's respond even better to mods than the LS1? Like the LS1 compared to the LT1 before it? Or are they close enough in technology that they respond very similarly?

The lighter car will have faster ET in this case . LS2 mod for mod to LS1 mod for mod is very similarly ,the weight is still the best facter
Old 10-23-2007 | 02:38 PM
  #16  
jetlag's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 2
From: Southaven, MS (near Memphis, TN)
Default

Well...not 100% stock...but you can look at my signature and see how the 2 did with almost the same mods.
Old 10-23-2007 | 03:48 PM
  #17  
Speedmonster185's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette/West Lafayette, IN
Default

One more question. I know that A4 LS1's aren't really slower (ET-wise) than the M6 cars, but how about the GTOs? Is th manual much faster than the auto, or vice versa?
Old 10-23-2007 | 04:38 PM
  #18  
CAMAROZ28SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: SOUTH FLORIDA
Default

drivers race..
Old 10-23-2007 | 04:53 PM
  #19  
COD02SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, Az
Default

I love when noobies post 320hp rating's for the WS6

WS6 : 3416 / 350 = 9.76
GTO : 3725 / 400 = 9.31

GTO is faster

Cars.com Figures
Old 10-23-2007 | 04:57 PM
  #20  
Bad Blue WS6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
From: Germantown Hills IL
Default

isnt it 300, or 305?


Quick Reply: Stock: LS1 F-Body vs. LS2 GTO



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.