Why is the LS1 so good?
#64
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This was ward's annual engine rating... this was for 1998
1998
BMW 3.2 L I6 DOHC
BMW 2.5 L I6 M52
Ford 2.5 L V6 Duratec SVT
Ford 5.4 L V8 Triton
General Motors 5.7 L V8 LS1
Mazda 2.3 L V6 KJ-ZEM
Mercedes-Benz 3.2 L V6 SOHC
Nissan 3.0 L V6 VQ30DE
Toyota 4.0 L V8 1UZ-FE DOHC
Volkswagen 1.8 L I4 DOHC turbo
1998
BMW 3.2 L I6 DOHC
BMW 2.5 L I6 M52
Ford 2.5 L V6 Duratec SVT
Ford 5.4 L V8 Triton
General Motors 5.7 L V8 LS1
Mazda 2.3 L V6 KJ-ZEM
Mercedes-Benz 3.2 L V6 SOHC
Nissan 3.0 L V6 VQ30DE
Toyota 4.0 L V8 1UZ-FE DOHC
Volkswagen 1.8 L I4 DOHC turbo
![GTFO](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/gtfoslap.gif)
I think they put that up there because the name sounds cool and tough TRITON V8 lolol
#69
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)
Last edited by ezwip; 05-31-2008 at 09:19 AM.
#71
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Im not trying to diss on the ls1 at all but, 1st of all the 5.9 liter with a 198hp is just plain bad engine, idk how you make 200hp from a 5.9 liter, 2nd of all i think the ls1 could have obviously been much better b/c look at the m3's, straight 6 3.2 liter puts down 340hp..... once again not trying to diss on the ls1 but obviously could have technically been much better, oh and the new m3's 4 liter v8 which putts out 412hp...... just saying
Heck our LS1 with Heads/Cam on a nitrous tune, through a stalled A4, with built tranny put 441 to the rear wheels, which is much more than the much more expensive Bimmer motors. Hell just think if we added timing and put a M6 behind the engine! In a package that is smaller and lighter than the Bimmer V8...
Forget displacement, lets look at the total package... Weight, dimensions, and return on investment...
#72
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Bimmer motors are pretty well maxed out in potential from the factory. Getting any kind of gains from them will cost a fortune and nowhere near the potential that locked away in a 1997 MY LS1 will. The thing with the LS1 is it was designed to be efficient, last a long time, make emmission requirements, and be cheap to produce. Now if you take for instance the 412hp M3 V8, and now take a max effort H/C/I/E LS1, the LS1 will blow the Bimmer motor away. Whereas with the older 3.2 and now 4.0 Bimmer motors will gain little to nothing even with expensive aftermarket parts. Not to mention the larger displacement LS1 weighs the same as the Bimmer I6 and has vastly superior potential.
Heck our LS1 with Heads/Cam on a nitrous tune, through a stalled A4, with built tranny put 441 to the rear wheels, which is much more than the much more expensive Bimmer motors. Hell just think if we added timing and put a M6 behind the engine! In a package that is smaller and lighter than the Bimmer V8...
Forget displacement, lets look at the total package... Weight, dimensions, and return on investment...
Heck our LS1 with Heads/Cam on a nitrous tune, through a stalled A4, with built tranny put 441 to the rear wheels, which is much more than the much more expensive Bimmer motors. Hell just think if we added timing and put a M6 behind the engine! In a package that is smaller and lighter than the Bimmer V8...
Forget displacement, lets look at the total package... Weight, dimensions, and return on investment...
![Stupid](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/stupid.gif)
#74
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Bimmer motors are pretty well maxed out in potential from the factory. Getting any kind of gains from them will cost a fortune and nowhere near the potential that locked away in a 1997 MY LS1 will. The thing with the LS1 is it was designed to be efficient, last a long time, make emmission requirements, and be cheap to produce. Now if you take for instance the 412hp M3 V8, and now take a max effort H/C/I/E LS1, the LS1 will blow the Bimmer motor away. Whereas with the older 3.2 and now 4.0 Bimmer motors will gain little to nothing even with expensive aftermarket parts. Not to mention the larger displacement LS1 weighs the same as the Bimmer I6 and has vastly superior potential.
Heck our LS1 with Heads/Cam on a nitrous tune, through a stalled A4, with built tranny put 441 to the rear wheels, which is much more than the much more expensive Bimmer motors. Hell just think if we added timing and put a M6 behind the engine! In a package that is smaller and lighter than the Bimmer V8...
Forget displacement, lets look at the total package... Weight, dimensions, and return on investment...
Heck our LS1 with Heads/Cam on a nitrous tune, through a stalled A4, with built tranny put 441 to the rear wheels, which is much more than the much more expensive Bimmer motors. Hell just think if we added timing and put a M6 behind the engine! In a package that is smaller and lighter than the Bimmer V8...
Forget displacement, lets look at the total package... Weight, dimensions, and return on investment...
#75
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lockport Illinois
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This was ward's annual engine rating... this was for 1998
1998
BMW 3.2 L I6 DOHC
BMW 2.5 L I6 M52
Ford 2.5 L V6 Duratec SVT
Ford 5.4 L V8 Triton
General Motors 5.7 L V8 LS1
Mazda 2.3 L V6 KJ-ZEM
Mercedes-Benz 3.2 L V6 SOHC
Nissan 3.0 L V6 VQ30DE
Toyota 4.0 L V8 1UZ-FE DOHC
Volkswagen 1.8 L I4 DOHC turbo
1998
BMW 3.2 L I6 DOHC
BMW 2.5 L I6 M52
Ford 2.5 L V6 Duratec SVT
Ford 5.4 L V8 Triton
General Motors 5.7 L V8 LS1
Mazda 2.3 L V6 KJ-ZEM
Mercedes-Benz 3.2 L V6 SOHC
Nissan 3.0 L V6 VQ30DE
Toyota 4.0 L V8 1UZ-FE DOHC
Volkswagen 1.8 L I4 DOHC turbo
#78
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The s52/s54 I6's have their own ways of uncorking horsepower. Boost. Lots of it.
Turbo kit, rod bolts, and a headgasket is all they need to make you **** your pants from a 65+ mph roll in 4th gear.
But anyways, I dont think the LS1 is the best motor ever made..I do think GM did a damn good job, though. But I like it becuase my Ls1 with 113,000 miles runs awesome, clowns on mustangs everyday, and gets around 24-25mpg.
Turbo kit, rod bolts, and a headgasket is all they need to make you **** your pants from a 65+ mph roll in 4th gear.
But anyways, I dont think the LS1 is the best motor ever made..I do think GM did a damn good job, though. But I like it becuase my Ls1 with 113,000 miles runs awesome, clowns on mustangs everyday, and gets around 24-25mpg.