General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Factory Shortcomings...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2008, 05:28 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
JosephIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Valley Lee, MD. Southern Maryland
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

name one good thing about FWD Hondas when it comes to performance? *crickets chrip*
.[/QUOTE]

Great Point!!!! I had a good laugh at this^
Old 06-24-2008, 05:35 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JosephIV
I started the thead because I can't exactly put my finger on why I love my truck after it's let me down recently and my car will need serious upgrades for the power that I'm planning but I wouldn't get rid of it either.

The truck had the tranny crap (factory sunshells are weak and planetary gears aren't any better) and the paper mache' Eaton locker ate itself. Now I've seen 7.5 inch 10 bolts grenade on street tires and can envision myself buying a 9 inch out of necessity.

My wife owns an 05 Honda Accord and it is the most vanilla car that you can buy. I won't trade my vehicles for anything that isn't enjoyable to drive and would rather get 15mpg local in my truck then 20 local in the wife's car.

I mentioned the Honda owner because we trade barbs and it's good ammo for him when he sees my truck broken down or watches a Z28 grenade its rear at MIR. I just tell him that his car smoked before the turbo and after the turbo so at least it's consistant.

Just trying to see why we're loyal to our cars and trucks despite obvious shortcomings.
the new Hondas have shitty clutches and shifter linkage. I haven't had any problems with my car, and my cousin has an 03 Chevy 1500 and neither has he. What short comings are you talking about, for there class they are great cars.
Old 06-24-2008, 05:41 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scoggin Dickey
Than you're wrong, it's not a claim, it's a fact.

On topic, these "shortcomings" aren't really shortcomings. Shocks that aren't good enough for the handling enthusiast is not a shortcoming from the factory, they perform just like a factory street car should. The 10-bolt isn't great for launching at the track, but it isn't a shortcoming because for a street driven car is is very adequate. Just because things aren't perfect for what we do with them doesn't make it a shortcoming. Heck if it came with perfect springs for the handling enthusiast, I could consider that a shortcoming because they would suck for the drag strip.
^^^^^^^^^
agree 100% with the second part

but you are just claiming it with no real facts, 30+ mpg is really good I have never gotten that but I mostly do city. Still havent seen close to that
Old 06-24-2008, 05:49 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
JosephIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Valley Lee, MD. Southern Maryland
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I considered the things that I brought up shortcomings because I stopped by to get my truck from getting the tranny fixed and the owner of the shop had 4L60 and 4L80 carcasses that suffered worse fates than mine. And the vehicles ranged from Elderly driven 2wd Silverados to beaten upon F-bodies. The trannies have known weak points that have failed in different vehicles under different circumstances.

Likewise, the guy at Randy's Ring and Pinion said that the G80 Eaton Locker is nicknamed the "Generic 80" and has a pretty big failure rate. The number of busted lockers at the local auto wrecker confirms this. Type in Eaton G80 failure or something close to that in a search and you'll have a good read.

Last edited by JosephIV; 06-24-2008 at 05:50 PM. Reason: deleted quote
Old 06-24-2008, 05:55 PM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought my gears form randies ring and pinion. We deal with those guys down there(we meaning our shop)
Old 06-24-2008, 06:00 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (33)
 
slow95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dublin Ga
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JosephIV
I considered the things that I brought up shortcomings because I stopped by to get my truck from getting the tranny fixed and the owner of the shop had 4L60 and 4L80 carcasses that suffered worse fates than mine. And the vehicles ranged from Elderly driven 2wd Silverados to beaten upon F-bodies. The trannies have known weak points that have failed in different vehicles under different circumstances.

Likewise, the guy at Randy's Ring and Pinion said that the G80 Eaton Locker is nicknamed the "Generic 80" and has a pretty big failure rate. The number of busted lockers at the local auto wrecker confirms this. Type in Eaton G80 failure or something close to that in a search and you'll have a good read.
take a look at any gm tranny that has overdrive, none have a real great reputation for holding up behind a v8. they don't even begin to compare to the older 3 speed automatics. these newer electronic controlled trannys are even more problematic because you have the weak spots as the 700r4 plus elctrical circuts that can go bad.
Old 06-24-2008, 06:04 PM
  #27  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (34)
 
Scoggin Dickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by carbonfiberbird
^^^^^^^^^
agree 100% with the second part

but you are just claiming it with no real facts, 30+ mpg is really good I have never gotten that but I mostly do city. Still havent seen close to that
Just like I said the first time, it's not a claim, it's a fact. I had a 6-speed that got 32 on the highway and an auto that got 26.
__________________

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice


Old 06-24-2008, 06:09 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Scoggin Dickey
On topic, these "shortcomings" aren't really shortcomings. Shocks that aren't good enough for the handling enthusiast is not a shortcoming from the factory, they perform just like a factory street car should.
No, not at all.
They suck for street driving, too much compression (see jarring ride creating rattles) and not enough rebound (floaty, disconnected feel). They belong on an old buick, not a performance car. With good shocks (like the Koni DA's that came on the 1LE cars) the car rides dramatically better(think BMW) and handles in a whole different league. Our cars fishtail and get squirly stock because of the lack of shock control. Our cars stock generally ride rough because of lack of shock control.

Heck if it came with perfect springs for the handling enthusiast, I could consider that a shortcoming because they would suck for the drag strip.
Unless you are running 10s or faster it wouldn't be all that bad. Look at the Z06 or any other Corvette, sure they don't dominate drag racing, but stock they don't have much trouble at all...
Old 06-24-2008, 06:52 PM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NHRAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

...........TURBO HONDA's................................
Old 06-24-2008, 06:55 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
JosephIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Valley Lee, MD. Southern Maryland
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

The aforementioned mileage claims aren't off base. My aunt has a 98 FRC C5 and averaged 28mpg from Harrisburg, PA to the Bowling Green 'Vette plant. I haven't driven long distance but see that 6th gear turns low RPM at 65mph.
Old 06-24-2008, 07:15 PM
  #31  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

okay, but if you get on it once your gas millage is gone where as with that honda you will always get 30+ mpg, unless you are literally always on the gas. You guys should all know this. A eg civic with a k20 swap is not a bad idea for a dd.

In my case I dont really need a dd we have a shop and all carpool in a geo(43 mpg average) so we dont spend much in gas.
Old 06-24-2008, 07:16 PM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

but if gas isn't what he cares about I say go with an f-body or vette all the way, with minor bolt ons you can get into the 12s
Old 06-24-2008, 08:15 PM
  #33  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
redls1bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^ Just because you dont get that kind of mileage doesnt mean it cant be done. I get 20 mpgs on the dot with a 50/50 mix of city and highway. All highway, no prob getting 27-28 mpgs. Thats after mods and putting down 375 to the wheels. Also, i cant ride for three hours and not get into it once or twice. My mileage still stays 25 +
Old 06-24-2008, 08:59 PM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Ntimid8r7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stank Cloud, FL
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Scoggin Dickey
Just like I said the first time, it's not a claim, it's a fact. I had a 6-speed that got 32 on the highway and an auto that got 26.
^+1000000000000
My A4 gets 30 on the highway. You can't expect to get that if you are driving in the city, thats a no brainer, but on the interstate it is a fact. Even on the dealer sticker it says 19 city 28 hwy, EPA indicates that the majority of these vehicles with this rating WILL achieve between 16 and 22 city, 23 and 33 hwy.
Old 06-24-2008, 11:42 PM
  #35  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
RaggedRides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wilkes-barre
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hmmmm...

My only real complaints about the F-bodies are the crummy power window motors, and the 7.5. Although adequate for the street, they're not really built for abuse. The LSX motors are incredible factory mills and our transmissions aren't too bad. Like it's been said, they all have their drawbacks. Hell, I'm willing to bet my ten year old, $6,250 Z28 will run more reliably and care free than a brand new, $200,000 Ferrari.

The old 87-92 Foxbodies had stout 8.8s, double rollers, and forged internals with less than 200rwhp on tap. That's nice over engineering , but they also carried a floppy chassis, drum rears, and sluggish transmissions snatched out of the truck parts bin. Every car and truck could use a little more than what the factory gives us, which is what makes them so damn cool.

We get to improve and modify




Speaking of gas guzzlin', I average about 20mpg. That's mostly city with an occasional jaunt down the e-way, and giving her just enough hell to bring a grin every now and then.
Old 06-25-2008, 01:16 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
carbonfiberbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Califronia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redls1bird
^ Just because you dont get that kind of mileage doesnt mean it cant be done. I get 20 mpgs on the dot with a 50/50 mix of city and highway. All highway, no prob getting 27-28 mpgs. Thats after mods and putting down 375 to the wheels. Also, i cant ride for three hours and not get into it once or twice. My mileage still stays 25 +
I agree now, I have noticed ALOT of people saying they get similar mpg out of there cars BUT what I was saying is you can get better gas mileage out of that honda with the right set up and have a car thats almost as fast and more versatile.

I have been looking at the honda forums lately and the lowest mpg I found was 28. The highest I saw was 45mpg but it was fully tuned and thats driven super conservative. The average I saw was 35, with city/highway.
Old 06-25-2008, 01:29 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
oneBADDz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Western Section
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carbonfiberbird
I agree now, I have noticed ALOT of people saying they get similar mpg out of there cars BUT what I was saying is you can get better gas mileage out of that honda with the right set up and have a car thats almost as fast and more versatile.

I have been looking at the honda forums lately and the lowest mpg I found was 28. The highest I saw was 45mpg but it was fully tuned and thats driven super conservative. The average I saw was 35, with city/highway.
Nosir, what you were saying was

Originally Posted by carbonfiberbird
what set up did you have with that civic?

I am by no means a civic fan but if you put a stock k20 in an eg hatch, you will get way better gas mileage than an ls1 and still get mid 13, you might get "30 plus" mpg but thats driving SUPER SUPER conservative, I personally dont believe when people say they get this incredible gas millage out of a f-body or vette.
Don't change your story because you're wrong. Go back to your Honda forum if you want to tout the Honda as being so spectacular. You don't really expect us to care around here do you? Stop with your Honda ****. If the lowest you found was 28 you are not paying attention.
Old 06-25-2008, 01:35 PM
  #38  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (33)
 
slow95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dublin Ga
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

show me a honda civic with a factory motor that even gets close 10s or even 11s, hell make it 12s that then we will talk about them being as fast much less their gas milage at that point.
Old 06-25-2008, 01:48 PM
  #39  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
b.lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southeast, Michigan
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I get 22 mpg city/fwy
with a 3.73 gear and A4.
Last time I went up north I got 26.6

My old 98 ls1 a4 stock gears got 28 on the highway.

M6 LS1 w/ stock gear = 30+mpg hwy
Old 06-25-2008, 02:07 PM
  #40  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
LS1_K1DD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oneBADDz
Nosir, what you were saying was


Don't change your story because you're wrong. Go back to your Honda forum if you want to tout the Honda as being so spectacular. You don't really expect us to care around here do you? Stop with your Honda ****. If the lowest you found was 28 you are not paying attention.
+1.

The point is all cars have some drawbacks. Stock for stock, and modded for modded, LS1>any Honduh. We have a better platform to build on, our cars dont sound like pissed off weedwackers, and we get damn good gas mileage even modded. But considering some factors and ones i have listed above, a couple miles per gallon, or a better overall vehicle??

What honduh's do on boost, we can do NA and be twice as reliable while doing it. Put that in your japanese pipe and smoke it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.