Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird Exterior Guides
- Chevrolet Camaro 2010-Present: How to Replace Your Power Window Actuator
Step by step instructions for do-it-yourself repairs.
Browse all: Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird Exterior Guides
LS1 replace power window motor only or whole regulator
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS1 replace power window motor only or whole regulator
Good day all!
I have a nice 98Z28 and well my motors have been slow from the get go but now it's just unacceptable and I think they need some help. In all my cars I always replaced the whole regulator. I always figured they are old and why not for the price difference anyways. So my question is on these cars a quick search leads me to see this is alot more challenging as the panel is fiberglass. Changing the regulator seems to involve drilling out the rivet heads within the fiberglass which is difficult not to damage the glass at the same time. Drilling out the rivets for the motor seems a little more like the way to go if the regulator is good obviously as you are making access holes in the door but not really affecting the structural hold of the regulator. I am pretty certain my regulators are fine just the motors.
Anyways any inside thoughts on the subject would be good. I just don't want to cause any harm to the car if I can avoid it.
I have a nice 98Z28 and well my motors have been slow from the get go but now it's just unacceptable and I think they need some help. In all my cars I always replaced the whole regulator. I always figured they are old and why not for the price difference anyways. So my question is on these cars a quick search leads me to see this is alot more challenging as the panel is fiberglass. Changing the regulator seems to involve drilling out the rivet heads within the fiberglass which is difficult not to damage the glass at the same time. Drilling out the rivets for the motor seems a little more like the way to go if the regulator is good obviously as you are making access holes in the door but not really affecting the structural hold of the regulator. I am pretty certain my regulators are fine just the motors.
Anyways any inside thoughts on the subject would be good. I just don't want to cause any harm to the car if I can avoid it.
#3
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,373
Likes: 0
Received 1,803 Likes
on
1,284 Posts
If you replace the regulator, you'll need a special rivit to avoid enlarging the hole over time and damaging the inner door structure.
Personally, I see no reason to replace the regulator so long as it's working fine. If the window goes up straight, seals properly, and isn't loose, then I would simply replace the motor(s). My driver's side went bad about 2-3 years ago, all I did was a motor swap and the regulator has been fine ever since.
Personally, I see no reason to replace the regulator so long as it's working fine. If the window goes up straight, seals properly, and isn't loose, then I would simply replace the motor(s). My driver's side went bad about 2-3 years ago, all I did was a motor swap and the regulator has been fine ever since.
#5
Sorry to bring this back from the dead guys but I have a question. My window will go up and down. However, when I am going up I have to go on intervals due to it stopping on its own every 6 inches or so. Would that mean I need to replace the motor or the regulator? Thanks and sorry for the thread revive.
#6
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,373
Likes: 0
Received 1,803 Likes
on
1,284 Posts
Sorry to bring this back from the dead guys but I have a question. My window will go up and down. However, when I am going up I have to go on intervals due to it stopping on its own every 6 inches or so. Would that mean I need to replace the motor or the regulator? Thanks and sorry for the thread revive.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
I like doing the regulator as one piece with the motor. I know it sounds strange, maybe its what Im used to, but I find its easier doing the regulator with the motor. And no extra holes need to be drilled into the door. The rivets are VERY important.
I've been told that the regulator is typically the cause of the motor going bad in the first place.
I've been told that the regulator is typically the cause of the motor going bad in the first place.
#9
What causes the motors to go bad on these cars? Ive already replaced 2 motors and im going on my 3rd one on 2 different fbodies. Ive never had to replace a window motor on any other car before.
#10
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
I used to do this to change my motors but went to shbox after the repeated drilling of the rivets started to damage the holes in the door. (You can't escape at least some damage every time.) I want to avoid having to install a reinforcing plate as long as I can.
My original regulator is smooth as glass and I've still had the motor problems over the life of the car. If the regulator was an issue, you could feel resistance/seizing after removing it. Did a part salesman tell you this?
Its just a very old design. You can look up P/N cross references and see that this part was installed on cars as early as 1969. Parts, motors, and seals have some a very since then! So far, we've had a lot more success with the Dorman motor, which is an updated design and said to be sealed better from contaminants.
Its just a very old design. You can look up P/N cross references and see that this part was installed on cars as early as 1969. Parts, motors, and seals have some a very since then! So far, we've had a lot more success with the Dorman motor, which is an updated design and said to be sealed better from contaminants.
#11
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,373
Likes: 0
Received 1,803 Likes
on
1,284 Posts
I used to do this to change my motors but went to shbox after the repeated drilling of the rivets started to damage the holes in the door. (You can't escape at least some damage every time.) I want to avoid having to install a reinforcing plate as long as I can.
My original regulator is smooth as glass and I've still had the motor problems over the life of the car. If the regulator was an issue, you could feel resistance/seizing after removing it. Did a part salesman tell you this?
My original regulator is smooth as glass and I've still had the motor problems over the life of the car. If the regulator was an issue, you could feel resistance/seizing after removing it. Did a part salesman tell you this?
Like many, I have never replaced the regulator and the new motor has done fine with the original regulator for several years. I see no reason to replace the regulator so long as the window continues to go up and down straight with no binding, seals properly, and isn't loose.
The old regulator can also be lubricated while you're in there. Silglyde would be a great choice, as reminded to me by wssix99. That stuff is also great to have around for brake lubrication (caliper slide pins and drum brake component contact points).
#12
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
Doing a window motor on these cars is pretty easy and can generally be done in about 30 to 45 minutes. I usually drill a small access hole in the fiberglass door panel to access the bolts on the motor. It doesnt cause any problems and doesnt weaken the door, but makes it a breeze to replace the motors.
#13
Actually there is nothing wrong with the motor its self, the problem is in the circuit breaker inside the motor. You can bypass it and the motor will run like new again BUT If you bypass it and you stick your head out the window and close the window....IT WILL CUT YOUR HEAD OFF Jim..............Thank You Spock for that info.
#14
I used to do this to change my motors but went to shbox after the repeated drilling of the rivets started to damage the holes in the door. (You can't escape at least some damage every time.) I want to avoid having to install a reinforcing plate as long as I can.
My original regulator is smooth as glass and I've still had the motor problems over the life of the car. If the regulator was an issue, you could feel resistance/seizing after removing it. Did a part salesman tell you this?
Its just a very old design. You can look up P/N cross references and see that this part was installed on cars as early as 1969. Parts, motors, and seals have some a very since then! So far, we've had a lot more success with the Dorman motor, which is an updated design and said to be sealed better from contaminants.
My original regulator is smooth as glass and I've still had the motor problems over the life of the car. If the regulator was an issue, you could feel resistance/seizing after removing it. Did a part salesman tell you this?
Its just a very old design. You can look up P/N cross references and see that this part was installed on cars as early as 1969. Parts, motors, and seals have some a very since then! So far, we've had a lot more success with the Dorman motor, which is an updated design and said to be sealed better from contaminants.
#15
Save the manuals!
iTrader: (5)
There's more to the Dorman than the thermal cutoff. The bearings are fully sealed, for one.
its not just the thermal cutoff that causes problems in the stock motor. They fail in a number of ways - the thermal cutoff is just one - and disabling that feature is not always a wise thing to do.
You don't hear a lot of the other failure modes because the result in sudden death of the motor:
- people mistake them for a switch issue
- its easier to understand that the motor needs replacing and folks don't need to post
- they die right as you have rolled down the window to pay the PA turnpike tool in a 20 degree blizzard (am I still bitter?) and folks are too frustrated to post about it (thankfully, we now have EZ Pass)
- people are so frustrated, they trow their computer out the window
its not just the thermal cutoff that causes problems in the stock motor. They fail in a number of ways - the thermal cutoff is just one - and disabling that feature is not always a wise thing to do.
You don't hear a lot of the other failure modes because the result in sudden death of the motor:
- people mistake them for a switch issue
- its easier to understand that the motor needs replacing and folks don't need to post
- they die right as you have rolled down the window to pay the PA turnpike tool in a 20 degree blizzard (am I still bitter?) and folks are too frustrated to post about it (thankfully, we now have EZ Pass)
- people are so frustrated, they trow their computer out the window
#20