General Maintenance & Repairs Leaks | Squeaks | Clunks | Rattles | Grinds
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Is this gas mileage normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
StryfeS13's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 106
Likes: 2
From: Fresno, CA
Default Is this gas mileage normal?

I can literally watch my gas gauge go down as I drive this car, have never had any other car where I can watch it go down lol.

I did some calculations and it just doesn't seem right. I bought the car in Modesto, and I live in Clovis, that is a 104 mile drive.

The car came with half a tank, and when I got home, it had under a quarter tank of gas. So, I would say in total, from that half of a tank, I would've got around 130-140 miles. That's 16.77 - 18.06 MPG.

The car is an M6, bone stock. No engine codes or anything, does this seem normal or is that bad?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 04:42 PM
  #2  
fruitsalad's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 441
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

for 100% bone stock that's not that great, but I don't think it's anything to be too concerned about. mine gets around 14mpg with nothing but lid, some POS flowmaster muffler the previous owner put on, and 4.10s in a 9".

however, when I drove it back from vegas after purchasing it, cruising at around 70 the whole way, I got something like 300 miles to the tank. with a combination of city and highway i get 200-210 miles to a tank. if i could manage 16-18 i'd be happy.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 05:02 PM
  #3  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 645
From: Winchester, VA
Default

You should be getting around 20 in town 26+ on the highway
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 05:38 PM
  #4  
JD_AMG's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,798
Likes: 16
From: St.Charles MO
Default

Originally Posted by StryfeS13
I can literally watch my gas gauge go down as I drive this car, have never had any other car where I can watch it go down lol.

I did some calculations and it just doesn't seem right. I bought the car in Modesto, and I live in Clovis, that is a 104 mile drive.

The car came with half a tank, and when I got home, it had under a quarter tank of gas. So, I would say in total, from that half of a tank, I would've got around 130-140 miles. That's 16.77 - 18.06 MPG.

The car is an M6, bone stock. No engine codes or anything, does this seem normal or is that bad?
First, these gas gauges are not all that accurate.
Fill the tank completely full, reset the trip odometer and then drive it until whenever you want to fill up next (fill it all the way again). Then take those miles compared to how much gas you actually put in the tank.
Next, use 6th gear at any speed above ~45mph. These are toruqey engines, you don't have to rev to get up to speed, use that to your advantage.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
ROCNDAV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 2
From: Pasadena, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
First, these gas gauges are not all that accurate.
Fill the tank completely full, reset the trip odometer and then drive it until whenever you want to fill up next (fill it all the way again). Then take those miles compared to how much gas you actually put in the tank.
Next, use 6th gear at any speed above ~45mph. These are toruqey engines, you don't have to rev to get up to speed, use that to your advantage.

I'd also recommend going back to the same station and filling up around the same time (hot vs cold temps can affect your fill amounts).
I drove 175 miles a day for seven years.
I got real good at comparing different gas stations.

I found I used more when filling up at the cheaper gas stations (Arco, AM/PM) (avg=14.5 gallons) than a station that charged 15 cents more per gallon (Shell/76) (avg=12.5 gallons).

If the car is new to you and you have been getting on the throttle a lot, that'll do it too. I noticed a considerable drop going from 3.23 to 3.73 gears. I can't blame it all on the gears. The response makes me get on it more

Lastly, I've read that changing out your rear O2s every 50K or so can help.
I've never done that, and have 150K+ on mine. I should change them out and see if it helps.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,629
Likes: 2,550
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Default

Originally Posted by ROCNDAV
Lastly, I've read that changing out your rear O2s every 50K or so can help.
I've never done that, and have 150K+ on mine. I should change them out and see if it helps.
Forget the rear O2s, they only monitor cat efficiency. I (as well as many others) have deleted rear O2s on multiple LS1s, and there is zero change in driveability/power/MPG. It's the *front* O2s that will affect performance and MPG.

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
First, these gas gauges are not all that accurate.
Fill the tank completely full, reset the trip odometer and then drive it until whenever you want to fill up next (fill it all the way again). Then take those miles compared to how much gas you actually put in the tank.
Next, use 6th gear at any speed above ~45mph. These are toruqey engines, you don't have to rev to get up to speed, use that to your advantage.
Good advice.

I will also add that there was unknown gas in the tank. Could have been old and/or too low of octane. So you can't put too much faith in those initial numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
M4N14C's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 16
From: Redmond, WA
Default

Originally Posted by JD_AMG
First, these gas gauges are not all that accurate.
Fill the tank completely full, reset the trip odometer and then drive it until whenever you want to fill up next (fill it all the way again). Then take those miles compared to how much gas you actually put in the tank.
Next, use 6th gear at any speed above ~45mph. These are toruqey engines, you don't have to rev to get up to speed, use that to your advantage.


After driving in an Accord for a couple years, took me a while to get used to driving my WS6. At first I always kept the revs up thinking I needed to downshift to get over minor hills. Only after reading that I didn't need to do that (I make more torque cruising than my accord made at WOT ) I kept my revs much lower and my mileage greatly improved.

Gas mileage is more of how you drive your car rather than what you have done to it
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 08:12 AM
  #8  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: MD
Default

1. Your method of "calculating" your fuel mileage is absurd.
2. Air temperature is irrelevent when refueling.
3. Driving style has the largest impact on mileage, and this car is unfamiliar to you.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 23, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #9  
2kflhr's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 3
From: Abilene, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
1. Your method of "calculating" your fuel mileage is absurd.
Air temperature is irrelevent when refueling.
I beg to differ. Due to thermal expansion and contraction the density of the fuel increases when cooled and decreases when heated. Now granted, the storage tanks are underground and likely see little temperature swings but the fuel delivery system is not so deep under ground and is more susceptible to temperature swings. Its been said that its better to fuel in the morning at lower temperatures than later in the heat of the day.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2013 | 06:23 PM
  #10  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by 2kflhr
Its been said that its better to fuel in the morning at lower temperatures than later in the heat of the day.
Everyone who says that is wrong. I didn't quote anything else you said because it's irrelevant. Don't believe me? Record the fuel temperature in the coldest day of winter and again on the hottest day of summer. THEN come back a let me know if the temperature varies more than 15 degrees. The temperature differential required to see any relevant change in specific volume would be more than 5 times what you find.

Last edited by Marc 85Z28; Aug 23, 2013 at 06:29 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2013 | 08:06 PM
  #11  
2kflhr's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 3
From: Abilene, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
Everyone who says that is wrong. I didn't quote anything else you said because it's irrelevant. Don't believe me? Record the fuel temperature in the coldest day of winter and again on the hottest day of summer. THEN come back a let me know if the temperature varies more than 15 degrees. The temperature differential required to see any relevant change in specific volume would be more than 5 times what you find.
Read this http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/reso...lUSAJune07.pdf I don't desire to match wits with you and get involved in a back and forth battle here I just thought your saying his "way of calculating fuel mileage was absurd" was a slam.

StryfeS13; As far as using the gas gauge to determine fuel usage it cannot be done in an F body car. Typically if the gauge reflects 1/2 a tank you are more than likely near a 3rd of a tank. The F Body tends to hang good in the greater than half a tank range and then drops like a rock at less than half a tank.

Last edited by 2kflhr; Aug 23, 2013 at 08:49 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2013 | 10:39 PM
  #12  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by 2kflhr
Read this http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/reso...lUSAJune07.pdf I don't desire to match wits with you and get involved in a back and forth battle here I just thought your saying his "way of calculating fuel mileage was absurd" was a slam.

StryfeS13; As far as using the gas gauge to determine fuel usage it cannot be done in an F body car. Typically if the gauge reflects 1/2 a tank you are more than likely near a 3rd of a tank. The F Body tends to hang good in the greater than half a tank range and then drops like a rock at less than half a tank.
Use a little common sense!!!

Every 15° increase lowers volume by about 1% The MOST EXTREME temperature variation will result in less than 2% change in volume. That's less than a 0.5 MPG in the MOST EXTREME case. Real world observations would put this number at less than 0.1 MPG, thus irrelevant like I said. And claiming his calculations being absurd was accurate. Even YOU state you cannot judge fuel consumed by some vague markings on a fuel gauge.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2013 | 12:22 AM
  #13  
Cole Train's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,829
Likes: 5
From: MN
Default

Mythbusters did a check on gas volumes in temperature changes didn't they?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2013 | 01:50 AM
  #14  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,629
Likes: 2,550
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
And claiming his calculations being absurd was accurate.
I agree; the calculation method was wrong and thus the results are erroneous and must be discarded.

As for the initial question, "Is this gas mileage normal?", no sound conclusion can be reached until the proper calculation method is used.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2013 | 04:21 PM
  #15  
ajwoodtransport's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Default

I'm a just a truck driver, but I shell out $80,000 dollars a year in fuel and do my own fuel taxes so trust me, I crunch numbers all the time. I agree with the others on here, you have to fill it up and then calculate the numbers. In fact, I'd take it a step further and say you have to fill it up several times and then average it out to come up with a credible number. When you fill it up, try to be consistent, like always fill up to the brim, or always fill it up to where it kicks off. That will help get you more accurate numbers.


As far as the temperature goes. This was discussed and researched in the trucking industry. If memory serves me right, the stations fuel pump's meter could be off as much as 5% under extreme temperature differences, thus resulting in a substantial lose of fuel when your talking 200-300 gallon capacities. However, once the fuel is in the vehicle (either with external return lines or closed within the tank) the fuel will quickly reach an average/normal temperature and thus not cause actual fluctuation in engines performance. I think there is a little truth to both sides of the argument, but in the end I'd say it probably wouldn't make a big enough difference on such a small tank in which the fuel was already there to begin with.

My car is a 2000 LS1, A4 with 115,000 miles, wearing all season tires at about 35-40psi. Earlier this summer, my son and I drove 4200 miles across the Rockies, up the California coast and then back home cruising 75-85mph with A/C on, did several burnouts, did a couple 1/4 mile test runs, got it up to 120+ a couple times so my son could experience that wind sound you get when you get up to those speeds, sat in rush hour traffic on the vegas strip, in LA, and in San Francisco, and we still average 24.29 mpg for the entire trip. So I think you need to re-check your numbers first and then if it's really that bad, then start trying to figure out what's wrong. Good luck.

Last edited by ajwoodtransport; Aug 26, 2013 at 04:27 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2013 | 04:44 PM
  #16  
LS6427's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 13
From: South Florida
Default

Change both 02 sensors....they're probably factory originals.

.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2013 | 11:07 PM
  #17  
JLFIII's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

I've been working as a valet for over 7 years, most newer cars display their mpg info (either in the odometer area or on one of the numerous information displays). Living in NYC where no one travels any appreciable distance on a highway, thus everyone is subjected to mostly "city driving", I can tell you that it has more to do with the driver than the car. I can park 10 honda civics with the same motor in one shift an they'll all have pretty good spread of gas mileage. When my wife drives our honda accord, she gets better mileage than I do, unless I'm trying to be efficient. While I'm not saying there aren't mechanical things that could effect your mileage, I think the driver/driving style will often dictate your mileage, the car's engine simply limits how good or bad you can make it
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2013 | 01:05 AM
  #18  
StryfeS13's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 106
Likes: 2
From: Fresno, CA
Default

Okay guys. I filled the tank up from empty to topped off. I spent $61 dollars and got 15.1 gallons of fuel.

I traveled 302 miles on the 15.1 gallons.

So..20MPG?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2013 | 09:32 AM
  #19  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by StryfeS13
Okay guys. I filled the tank up from empty to topped off. I spent $61 dollars and got 15.1 gallons of fuel.

I traveled 302 miles on the 15.1 gallons.

So..20MPG?
Mixed driving? If so, that's about right. All or mostly highway should yield another 5-6mpg. Ideal conditions will flirt with 30.

You should monitor the mileage through the next few tanks to get a realistic average. That 20 could rise or drop a few.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2013 | 02:28 PM
  #20  
fruitsalad's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 441
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by StryfeS13
Okay guys. I filled the tank up from empty to topped off. I spent $61 dollars and got 15.1 gallons of fuel.

I traveled 302 miles on the 15.1 gallons.

So..20MPG?
consider yourself lucky... that same amount gets me 200 miles
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE