Anyone know what the number is? Does this filter make it easier to change filter with FLP headers? Any disadvantage to using this filter?

Thanks in Advance, <img border="0" alt="[Firebird]" title="" src="graemlins/formula.gif" />

Randy

 

or a Fram PH3675, Napa 1045,or Mobil 1 MI-206 which I believe has a anti drain back valve (check valve). Anybody?

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Any disadvantage to using this filter?

Thanks in Advance, <img border="0" alt="[Firebird]" title="" src="graemlins/formula.gif" />

Randy</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Clearance would be the only issue. At least in a C5, it hangs down below everything.

 

Thanks Guys, <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

I'll look at a couple of these and let you know about the clearance with the FLPs.

kewlbrz, I just bought a 2000 Dark Green C5 Coupe, so thanks for the heads up on the filter hanging so low. I have'nt had it long enough yet to even worry about the oil system. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

Later, Randy <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />

 

Delco PF-58

 

You could also use the AC PF59, or the K&N HP2006.

 

i have used the longer filter in my z twice...the kn filter and have never had it scrape on anything...but i'm extra careful going up steep ramps

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

 

whats the difference between the pf58 and pf59?

 

The 59 has an antidrainback valve, the 58 does not.

 

I've used pf59 for a few years but I finally switched to the tall K&N filter which I have to admit does a better job.