Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

new edelbrock ls1 intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2003, 10:49 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
 
Slammed'99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does the MSD ignition work with the stock coil packs? Or are the packs eliminated?
Old 11-12-2003, 03:59 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
 
greatwhite99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have the link for a pic here
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/...7118_pro_e.gif
Old 11-12-2003, 09:17 PM
  #23  
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
 
wrencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by strife
now thats going to be interesting

This is the first time I seen a pic of this thing.

I am disappointed to say the least.

It is a small square flange dual plane manifold.

The only reason I could see to carb an LS1 is for racing.

This intake is clearly not meant for that.
For a street application you'd be much better off leaving F/I on it.

Hopefully they got a dominator square flange open manifold in the works!
On N/A pro racing the dominator still rules F/I got a way to go...
Old 11-12-2003, 10:42 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Gen3Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ok im confused already......everyone is saying it on this thread but i dont know what it means

what is a carb?

i know it has to do with the fuel delivery
is this some kind of ancient system used by people in the early days?
Old 11-12-2003, 11:06 PM
  #25  
iTrader: (3)
 
sawedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What a mockery!! I wonder how much horsepower you'd lose going back to "ancient" carburetion? The old aftermarket manuafacturers just don't f*ckin' get it. I don't think they can. They've sunk so much investment into the old stuff, and the R&D cost of the new hardware, to them, would make their prices so damn high nobody would touch it. This is where the pond turns over, and new guys (businesses) come on the scene. This rates up there with the solid aluminum "heatsink" LS1 manifold I saw, that was recently introduced on the market.
Old 11-12-2003, 11:24 PM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
Tally TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tallahassee, Fl
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

this product would be much better if it was a high rise single plane setup

the thought of putting a carb on an ls1 with electonic timing made me start to drool, but a low rise dual plane setup would not be in the right direction

and carbs are far from ancient, sure they were around before fuel injection, however the advances in carbs is astonishing and for a drag setup, cant beat a carb
Old 11-12-2003, 11:42 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
FAST LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Athens TN
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
this product would be much better if it was a high rise single plane setup

the thought of putting a carb on an ls1 with electonic timing made me start to drool, but a low rise dual plane setup would not be in the right direction

and carbs are far from ancient, sure they were around before fuel injection, however the advances in carbs is astonishing and for a drag setup, cant beat a carb
Yep, if they would have made it look like this single plane intake for a ford:

We might have seen a lot more intrest.
Old 11-13-2003, 07:36 AM
  #28  
Staging Lane
 
Slammed'99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some of you guys should start your own company of making intakes. Since you obviously know more then one of the biggest and oldest companies in the industry .

I find it hard to believe that someone can doubt the performance capabilities of this intake, before they even have any facts to back it up. This is brand new territory for the LS, lets wait to see some hp numbers before we bash.

This is a RPM intake, for a carb aplication, they have always been dual planes. I'm sure a Victor single plane will be here shortly.

Also, if tuned right, carb will make more hp then EFI. In theory.
Old 11-13-2003, 08:26 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Excal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how dissapointing indeed..carb?

he's gonna make money from older guys who want to swap and don't know how to deal with efi or whatever...but please..

what next bias plias tires?
Old 11-13-2003, 08:49 AM
  #30  
Staging Lane
 
Slammed'99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe you need to be informed that Edelbrock was one of the 1st companies to even offer after-market fuel injection. The Pro-Flow came out about 15 years ago.

How many EFI systems have you designed?
Old 11-13-2003, 12:48 PM
  #31  
iTrader: (3)
 
sawedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
and carbs are far from ancient, sure they were around before fuel injection, however the advances in carbs is astonishing and for a drag setup, cant beat a carb
Compared to modern day EFI systems, yes it is old hat technology. Sure they have done a number of improvements on a carburetor in racing, but that's only because they have to. They still use carbs in racing for a few reasons, one is to control costs, and the other is to keep the speeds of the cars down, or they'd be going faster. NASCAR participants are damn near 200mph cars now. If they went to EFI God only knows. The speeds would exceed what most of the tracks are designed to handle, and that endangers the viewing public and the race participants. That is why they do it!
Old 11-13-2003, 12:57 PM
  #32  
iTrader: (3)
 
sawedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Excal
how dissapointing indeed..carb?

he's gonna make money from older guys who want to swap and don't know how to deal with efi or whatever...but please..

what next bias plias tires?
Exactly!! I couldn't agree with you more!
Old 11-13-2003, 01:02 PM
  #33  
iTrader: (3)
 
sawedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slammed'99
Maybe you need to be informed that Edelbrock was one of the 1st companies to even offer after-market fuel injection. The Pro-Flow came out about 15 years ago.

How many EFI systems have you designed?
I'm thinking of Hilborn, Weber, and Offenhauser, that were way before Vic Edelbrock had his thing going. The Germans had fuel injection as far back as the late 1920's.

Last edited by sawedoff; 11-13-2003 at 01:24 PM.
Old 11-13-2003, 05:10 PM
  #34  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
ss427ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: GP, TX
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sawedoff
Compared to modern day EFI systems, yes it is old hat technology. Sure they have done a number of improvements on a carburetor in racing, but that's only because they have to. They still use carbs in racing for a few reasons, one is to control costs, and the other is to keep the speeds of the cars down, or they'd be going faster. NASCAR participants are damn near 200mph cars now. If they went to EFI God only knows. The speeds would exceed what most of the tracks are designed to handle, and that endangers the viewing public and the race participants. That is why they do it!
You make me laugh............at your ignorance.
Old 11-13-2003, 08:24 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
Tally TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tallahassee, Fl
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i agree
Old 11-13-2003, 09:11 PM
  #36  
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
 
wrencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I second that.
Old 11-13-2003, 09:15 PM
  #37  
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
 
wrencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Question, what is the fastest N/A gasoline V-8's let's say 1/4 mile, their size, ignition & fuel system?

It 's gonna be a while when it is a fuel injected set up.
Old 11-13-2003, 09:43 PM
  #38  
Launching!
 
Kobwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My eyes are beginning to bleed. Who cares as long as it hauls azz. Carb, FI, EFI, afterburner , it's all good and all have merits!
Old 11-13-2003, 11:14 PM
  #39  
Sawzall and Welder Mod
iTrader: (46)
 
Whistler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Just because it is available doesn't mean you have to buy it.

I personally have no use for it but I could care less if the guy next door wants to pick up 10HP and get 6 MPG

On an older car it could be cool, it would be easier to swap and you'ld have no expensive injectors, massair meters... etc to mess with.

And no damn LS1 edit or paying for PCM tunes!
Old 11-14-2003, 07:22 AM
  #40  
Staging Lane
 
Slammed'99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"I'm thinking of Hilborn, Weber, and Offenhauser, that were way before Vic Edelbrock had his thing going. The Germans had fuel injection as far back as the late 1920's."

There were all MECHANICAL fuel injection! Just a little bit of difference there, and I'm saying that sarcatically!


Quick Reply: new edelbrock ls1 intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.