Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which Headers To Get???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2010 | 11:01 PM
  #1  
Snaggle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default Which Headers To Get???

I was just wondering everyones opinion on which headers to get for my 98 camaro ss. I want the best ground clearance and the easiest install. I dont want to modify anything or cut ,notch,bend,etc. I am going with cats to a gmmg cat back. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Joey
Old 02-07-2010 | 11:24 PM
  #2  
smok'nZ's Avatar
MASS seller approved
15 Year Member
iTrader: (160)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 1
From: OKLAHOMA
Default

stay away from pacesetter kooks or other stainless
Old 02-07-2010 | 11:37 PM
  #3  
WizardofDetailing's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
Default

Originally Posted by smok'nZ
stay away from pacesetter kooks or other stainless
Why stay away from stainless? It's much better for states that use salt during the winter.
Old 02-07-2010 | 11:53 PM
  #4  
BriancWS6's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 1
From: The Garage
Default

I'm pretty sure he meant to say stay away from Pacesetter, and to go with Kooks or another stainless header. Some people don't use proper grammar and/or punctuation.

To the OP, what type of budget do you have in mind for the headers?
Old 02-07-2010 | 11:53 PM
  #5  
casca2001's Avatar
Staging Lane

 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

I went with kooks and couldn't be happier, good ground clearance and i did not have to tweak their fit at all.
Old 02-08-2010 | 01:52 AM
  #6  
Cumbias's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 1
From: San Bernardino, CA
Default

ARH heard they slip right in, have a nice merge in the Y and are stainless.
Old 02-08-2010 | 02:14 AM
  #7  
smok'nZ's Avatar
MASS seller approved
15 Year Member
iTrader: (160)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 1
From: OKLAHOMA
Default

Originally Posted by BriancWS6
I'm pretty sure he meant to say stay away from Pacesetter, and to go with Kooks or another stainless header. Some people don't use proper grammar and/or punctuation.

To the OP, what type of budget do you have in mind for the headers?
yup i have been drinking

pacesetter sucks kooks or i think lpp is the way to go pacesetter are fine if you dont car about what they look like
Old 02-08-2010 | 02:15 AM
  #8  
98z8uup's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Covington ,GA
Default

Look at BBK Stainless long tubes.
Old 02-08-2010 | 03:19 AM
  #9  
Gordo78's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by smok'nZ
yup i have been drinking

pacesetter sucks kooks or i think lpp is the way to go pacesetter are fine if you dont car about what they look like
Pretty happy with mine Not sure why they suck so bad fitment was good. Mine are Jet Hot coated though, and not the **** coating from pacesetter they were recoated from FX. Maybe thats what your getting at.
Old 02-08-2010 | 10:31 AM
  #10  
dgcustomz's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 19
From: FORT WORTH
Default

Some people need to learn how to use punctuation marks.
Either way, Kooks for the ftmfw!
Old 02-08-2010 | 01:39 PM
  #11  
ncfastls1's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina, NC
Default

Not sure what your budget is, but I highly recommend Kooks. They're a little pricey but the fitment is perfect, very high quality, and they sound awesome. I picked up a **** ton of power when I added my Kooks LTs and their catted y.
Old 02-08-2010 | 02:23 PM
  #12  
BriancWS6's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 1
From: The Garage
Default

There is NOTHING wrong with the construction quality or fitment of Pacesetters. I have used them in the past on my own car, and installed many sets on other cars. No, they won't stay looking good forever, as no coated header will.

I LMAO when I hear someone talking about X brand header and how they "sound awesome". ALL headers will sound identical to the human ear. What is it that's gonna make them sound different?

Basically you have the choice of spending more money for a high end stainless header that will last the life of the car, or you can go the cheaper route with black painted or ceramic coated that will still last a long time, just won't look as good after some time passes.

Personally, I had Pacesetters on my current car, and I sold them since I am changing setups, and will be replacing them with ARH. It's a personal choice, but it doesn't mean I think Pacesetters are junk, cause they are not.
Old 02-08-2010 | 02:36 PM
  #13  
Dskeet6's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Drexel Hill
Default

LPP headers here..... no complaints good ground clearance - high flow merges... stainless

car makes 345hp 351lbs/ft with LPPS and an ls6 intake.... they have proven to be a good bolt on for a VERY reasonable price
Old 02-08-2010 | 03:20 PM
  #14  
rpmauto's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

I got the ARH headers and y. I have better ground clearance than I had when the exhaust was all factory. Fits awesome, great merge. The only thing i wish it has was a ball flange like the dynomaxx headers (i think those are the ones) I hate slip fit connections.
Old 02-08-2010 | 03:35 PM
  #15  
fatmat80's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: oakland, ca
Default

Tsp 1 7/8 on my 01 z/28, no issues with mine...
Old 02-08-2010 | 04:34 PM
  #16  
Snaggle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for all the info I'm now stuck between KOOKS and ARH. Someone also mentioned something about Dynatech Supermaxx headers. Anyone have any experience with them. I think I'm leaning more towards the ARH because everyone says they have a better catted y and merge.

Thanks again guys
Old 02-08-2010 | 05:18 PM
  #17  
ws6fitz's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
Default

Why stay away from pacesetter?? They are a great header and you can get them with their armor coating.... for under 400 bucks they imo are the way to go. Youll make the same power as a slp header, not to mention they are way overpriced.

Im from illinios and have no problem with them and have several friends using them as well. So i dont know why all of you are pacesetter haters out there...... But i strongly recomend them.
Old 02-08-2010 | 05:31 PM
  #18  
'00 formula elesone's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee,Fl.
Default

I agree. Pacesetters are very good for the $ and make real good power.
Old 02-08-2010 | 07:42 PM
  #19  
Dskeet6's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Drexel Hill
Default

Originally Posted by Snaggle
Thanks for all the info I'm now stuck between KOOKS and ARH. Someone also mentioned something about Dynatech Supermaxx headers. Anyone have any experience with them. I think I'm leaning more towards the ARH because everyone says they have a better catted y and merge.

Thanks again guys


ohhhh well if you have that much $$$ to throw down then I say go ARH
Old 02-08-2010 | 10:24 PM
  #20  
Shockwave179's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Default

Go ARH, the ground clearance and fit is second to none.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.