O2 Sensors and 110 / race gas
03-04-2010, 09:41 PM
#22
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-04-2010, 09:49 PM
#23
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and u'r only arguement to back up (u'r theory) is "well, the dyno said..." lol
personally, i bet the car was knocking to begin with, and then the race gas freed up those couple hp. probably timing was too high to begin with. since u said u changed nothing between runs except gas.
maybe if u contributed something scientificly based results, i would listen to u'r ideas more.
Last edited by 01'SSLSX; 03-04-2010 at 10:13 PM.
03-05-2010, 10:36 AM
#25
i gave u Several short paragraphs of info, which are definitions of Octane ratings and how they work.
and u'r only arguement to back up (u'r theory) is "well, the dyno said..." lol
personally, i bet the car was knocking to begin with, and then the race gas freed up those couple hp. probably timing was too high to begin with. since u said u changed nothing between runs except gas.
maybe if u contributed something scientificly based results, i would listen to u'r ideas more.
and u'r only arguement to back up (u'r theory) is "well, the dyno said..." lol
personally, i bet the car was knocking to begin with, and then the race gas freed up those couple hp. probably timing was too high to begin with. since u said u changed nothing between runs except gas.
maybe if u contributed something scientificly based results, i would listen to u'r ideas more.
what do you want me to do? what "scientific data" do you want? you want me to have Bill Nye come in and do a taste test?
im getting ready to dyno my 355 for my blazer. its nothing special, so if an improvement is going to be shown, it will show here.
i like how everybody on this forum will call BS on something untill they see dyno proof, now that you have dyno proof, you call BS and ask for paper information. is nothing good enough for anyone?
03-05-2010, 02:06 PM
#26
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
u need to go to Wikipedia and look up Octane Ratings. they got their research from the chemist's who made the octane rating system.
if u argue with them, then i guess u'r telling me that u are smarter than the poeple who designed the octane rating system/table.
if u argue with them, then i guess u'r telling me that u are smarter than the poeple who designed the octane rating system/table.
03-05-2010, 03:10 PM
#27
it doesnt matter what the papers say. the papers say a flowmaster adds X amount of power to our cars but we all know it doesnt add ****....from dyno testing. and my dyno test shows it makes more power. ill do it again when i dyno my 355. ill tune it to run on 93, then add 110 to it and post the dyno graphs.
03-05-2010, 04:21 PM
#28
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im not talking about marketing propaganda that is an opinion based claim.
im stating scientific facts of chemistry.
whatever bww, why dont u go get some JET FUEL and tell us how much u pick up. LMAO
im stating scientific facts of chemistry.
whatever bww, why dont u go get some JET FUEL and tell us how much u pick up. LMAO
03-05-2010, 09:54 PM
#29
He KNOWS what hes talking about, "There is no more BTU content in race gas than pump gas" Its a FACT.
But I am humored that you keep it going thinking it was the higher octane that somehow made power.....Its most just likely bad data.
03-06-2010, 10:24 AM
#30
Well i guess they could all be wrong? And your one well written out dyno results are right?
When you get results out of the norm there is usually a reason why, even if you cant see it...
And if you search and search and double/triple check everything and it still comes up the same, then you possibly have a break through...in your cause i dont think it is the latter...
03-06-2010, 10:37 AM
#31
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Race fuel or leaded fuel will not damage o2 sensors just by running it. The only time lead will take out an o2 sensor is if you have straight unburnt raw fuel hit a hot o2. When i had my turbo neon i still had stock o2s, wideband sensor and that was with 50,000 miles with always running some sort of race fuel in the tank.
03-06-2010, 10:47 AM
#32
Race fuel or leaded fuel will not damage o2 sensors just by running it. The only time lead will take out an o2 sensor is if you have straight unburnt raw fuel hit a hot o2. When i had my turbo neon i still had stock o2s, wideband sensor and that was with 50,000 miles with always running some sort of race fuel in the tank.
03-06-2010, 01:53 PM
#34
03-07-2010, 09:01 AM
#36
let us know how long the O2s last...or better yet when you times start going to **** cause you are still running damaged sensors cuase that can't be the problem why the car is slowing down...
good luck with the car just stop spreading bullshit on here...cause some noob might make the mistake and actually believe what you are saying is truth...
oh and you might as well go with some oxygenated c16...no reason to half *** it...
