3" ypipe to 4" merge
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...r-4-merge.html
I really don't see a disadvantage with my setup at all. The only thing is the attraction it causes with the cutout open on the street (which I don't do much). I just ran the car last month at the track. It's about 3800-3900lbs and has the exhaust w/ 1 7/8th headers, ls6 intake, 9" w/ 4.11's, lid, and a formato tune. Went 12.5@112 mph w/ a best mph of 113 and 2.0 60' time. Ended up breaking the driveshaft before getting comfortable with launching it, so low low 12's were possible.
Since you ride around with the cutout closed, I don't notice supposed loss of low end tq with the large headers and exhaust. I did what I did to leave room when I mod the car further and won't have to rebuild the exhaust.
Someone check my math here, but using the ol' "Area of a circle is pie*r^2" I come up with:
4" pipe = 12.56
3.5" pipe = 9.6163
3" pipe = 7.065
2.5" pipe = 4.9063
Dual 3" pipes = 14.13
Dual 2.5" pipes = 9.8125
It looks like the 4" pipe has 23.4% more area than a 3.5" pipe, and 43.8% more area than a single 3" pipe.
It also looks like the 4" pipe is only 11% smaller than dual 3" pipes, but 28% greater than dual 2.5" pipes.
All this just for perspective

this pretty much explains it. 3" true duals are the best. followed by a 3"/4" merge. and you would kill that gain by plugging a 3" cat back onto the 4" i-pipe.
this pretty much explains it. 3" true duals are the best. followed by a 3"/4" merge. and you would kill that gain by plugging a 3" cat back onto the 4" i-pipe.
IMHO Larger pipe sounds like ****.
And sometimes a 4" pipe will flow worse then a 3" pipe. Heat, volume, air speed, turbulence it is all effected.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uha_J...eature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwZt9...eature=channel
^and thats where the problem lies, it's your opinion and not based on actual testing or actual hp/tq/cfm #'s.
now i would love to see a dyno comparison between 3" y-pipe with 3" merge and a 3" cb with 2.5" tails vs. a 3" y-pipe with a 4" merge with a true 3" cb vs. a 3" y-pipe with a 4" inch merge with a 4" cb with 3.5" tails.
Example. Trust's old T/A. He made more power(across the board) with a Y pipe (exactly like mine except he had 2.5" tailpipes) and a magnaflow muffler than he did with his 3" true duals and bullets dumped at the axle.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Example. Trust's old T/A. He made more power(across the board) with a Y pipe (exactly like mine except he had 2.5" tailpipes) and a magnaflow muffler than he did with his 3" true duals and bullets dumped at the axle.
also i came across a guy that had the same cam as i did with more bolt ons than me but had a y-pipe set up and made about 10 hp less than me(when i had my TD's).
also whats the point of having a 4" merge/i-pipe if it's only about a foot long? why not have the 4" cb and stretch the 4" section all the way back over the axle to the muffler? also i do plan on going pretty wild with my set up eventually, probably pretty close to pat g's set up.
also whats the point of having a 4" merge/i-pipe if it's only about a foot long? why not have the 4" cb and stretch the 4" section all the way back over the axle to the muffler? also i do plan on going pretty wild with my set up eventually, probably pretty close to pat g's set up.
They have some badass y pipes. They are the ones that made the y pipes for lg etc.






