Descreen or don't descreen
For all of you nay sayers saying the screen is saving your engines because it is stopping all the bugs, twigs, rocks, grass, leafs, sticks...ect... Can you imagine how much dirt your engine is inhaling if you are finding that garbage in your maf screen? If your lid is fitting that poorly that all that garbage is finding it's way to your screen, all this time your engine has been guzzling everything else that is getting through your lid and can fit through the holes in the screen. I guess we can make a new rule of thumb that if it can fit through the holes in the maf screen than it's a ok for the engine.
face down in a dish of paint stripper overnight, it will
pop right out. Then you can epoxy it back in later if
you want. Or do it to the front of a junk one and swap.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My car's my daily driver, and I am not rich enough to replace a blown motor because something stupid like that happens. I'm just sayin. Why would cost-cutting GM spend the money to put a screen in the MAFs if all it did was obstruct airflow?
the screen isnt designed to save you from human error. I daily drove my car for over 4 years and had no screen and drove it to the track and back numerous times and did'nt have a single issue. Or i guess some people are just luckier than others?
BTW: I descreen and modify the tune to account for it or just get rid of the MAF entirely.
Thanks for the reply's fellas.
I still haven't gotten an answer as to why cheap *** GM would have spent the extra money to put screens in the MAFs if they don't serve any purpose.
That's because the screen does serve a purpose. It's there to straighten the airflow for more accurate MAF readings. Lots of cars, not just LS1s, have screens in the MAF. Some cars don't have screens. If the engineers decided that a screen is necessary on our cars to reduce turbulence then I'm not going to argue with them.
Look, I'm all for doing free mods for extra HP but let's not get carried away. Remember, we're not Honda owners, we don't think that a K&N intake is good for 50 HP, or that a "chip" on an otherwise stock car will let you blow the doors off a Lambo.
I still haven't gotten an answer as to why cheap *** GM would have spent the extra money to put screens in the MAFs if they don't serve any purpose.
That's because the screen does serve a purpose. It's there to straighten the airflow for more accurate MAF readings. Lots of cars, not just LS1s, have screens in the MAF. Some cars don't have screens. If the engineers decided that a screen is necessary on our cars to reduce turbulence then I'm not going to argue with them.
Look, I'm all for doing free mods for extra HP but let's not get carried away. Remember, we're not Honda owners, we don't think that a K&N intake is good for 50 HP, or that a "chip" on an otherwise stock car will let you blow the doors off a Lambo.
On a side note, it's beyond me as to why seemingly none of these companies can make a damned plastic lid to fit an f-body correctly. It's not exactly a complex part...
It really is awful that we pay $100+ for a piece of plastic that's designed to fit our cars, but we still end up with a poorly fitting lid... unfortunantly that's the nature of the beast when everything gets made in China using the cheapest methods possible.
if **** that large is getting in you have much larger problems and might as well not be using a filter





