Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

how much power is a ls6 intake good for

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2010, 12:11 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
spotme03please's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: coal city, il
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default how much power is a ls6 intake good for

how much power is an ls6 intake good for or should i go buy a fast 102 intake. or is it worth it for the fast 102 i have a ls6 intake on the car now.
Old 12-03-2010, 03:40 PM
  #2  
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
BOBS99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Elyria Ohio
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What are your other mods? Have you read the threads about the fast intakes etc,honest if you have a killer head and cam combo and could spare the money I say go for it,but it might not even be worth it,mod list if its in your sig I can't see it on my phone
Old 12-03-2010, 03:42 PM
  #3  
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
BOBS99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Elyria Ohio
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

How much hp are you making now?
Old 12-03-2010, 10:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
35th camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NB Canada
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have made 457rwhp on a 402 with the ls6 int.
Old 12-03-2010, 11:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
fatmat80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fast intakes seem to help N/A setups more than boosted ones, I say look for a 90 or 92for a good price. Dont know about rwhp but there are some people on here in the 8s with ls6 intakes.
Old 12-04-2010, 07:11 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ On a 402, I would say it MAY be worth it. The 102 was made for larger displacement engines anyway... But I'd still feel more comfortable recommending the 92mm setup.
Old 12-05-2010, 01:34 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
spotme03please's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: coal city, il
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i have an slp lid,cut the fins out of air box, polished maf, coolant line redirected off of tb,ls6 intake. ls6 heads, s15 speed inc. cam, pace setter headers, electric cut out. thats what i got for the motor. have supension work .
Old 12-05-2010, 02:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
XtremeDime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anchorage, ALASKA
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just go turbo and you wont have to worry about changing the intake :p
Old 12-05-2010, 04:08 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

id get a FAST.
Old 12-05-2010, 04:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

it should add 10 hp when all other mods are done.
Old 12-05-2010, 04:34 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Nemesis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central TX
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Whether or not it's "worth it"... well it's going to be up to you. As mentioned, fast intakes are oriented more towards blocks with big cubes, but not to say it won't help a mild setup. It just may not be much better than the ls6 intake for the price.

Also as mentioned, maybe try and wait for a good deal on used 90mm fast if your convinced enough to buy one.
Old 12-05-2010, 04:47 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
brian_rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas/Afghanistan
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

if you can afford a FAST then go for it. that s15 should love the 102. especially if/when the heads are ported.
Old 12-06-2010, 09:57 AM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
spotme03please's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: coal city, il
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea I think I am going to change out the cam an go with the ms4. And look for a used fast intake.
Old 12-08-2010, 04:19 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (149)
 
MJs1FastSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riverside
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

personally i would leave the ls6 on unless u have a bigger cube motor as stated above the 102 is ideal for BIGGER cubes... the ls6 is good for 10 and many people have many big numbers still running the ls6
if you plan on h/c the car with that ms4 then invest in a 90 or 92 not the 102
Old 12-08-2010, 04:55 PM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (20)
 
hitmanws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Get the 102, it makes no sense to get a 90 or 92 when they are selling for not much less than a new 102. And they are not too big for stock cubes, do some research. Every motor on stock cubes has great results with it at any modification level
Old 12-09-2010, 09:22 AM
  #16  
Teching In
 
jobberone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think the 102 is too big for your current setup. I'm switching out to a 102 intake with a ported LS7 TB but I have a 91mm ID intercooler outlet, 227 heads and 20lbs of boost. You need bigger cubes or boost and bigger heads. You will get driveability problems with the 102 with your current setup.
Old 12-09-2010, 10:04 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Have any of you that are suggesting a 102 is too big used one?

The real knowledgeable guys are saying its a myth, and considering I doubt FAST is stupid enough to discontinue an intake that would be "better" for smaller cube motors I'm inclined to believe them.

Overkill? Sure. But "too big", IE losing power due to the intake? Doubt it. The bigger issues seem to be the switch in fuel rails increasing the effective price.

A used 90-92 would be a MUCH better deal though.
Old 12-09-2010, 03:43 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
jobberone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There are drivebility and tuning issues with the 102 on a small bore block. I'm putting one on mine but I'm running 20lbs of boost but mostly because I got a good deal on it. With my 91mm ID on my intercooler outlet all I really need is a ported 90 like the LS7.
Old 12-09-2010, 03:50 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
180ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would also have a cam custom ground for your setup instead of just buying a off the shelf one. And yes if you have the coin to spare get the 102 that 402 will thank you for it. Personally i would just try to pick up a ported fast 90 though so i could save some coin.
Old 12-09-2010, 08:17 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
The real knowledgeable guys are saying its a myth, and considering I doubt FAST is stupid enough to discontinue an intake that would be "better" for smaller cube motors I'm inclined to believe them.
Ive explained it about 100 times, no one listens. Im tired of typing it.

Cliffs Notes:The 102 is not too big, the runners make intake too big or to small, not the throttle body opening. THIS IS NOT A WET INTAKE.



Maybe everyone doesnt know what a runner is????????


Quick Reply: how much power is a ls6 intake good for



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.