TSP 100mm MAF issues..keeps throwing code
11-24-2012, 02:32 AM
#61
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not too jack this thread or anything but for the ones who have installed the screen, what ratio did you go with? i've been looking and not sure what would work best. i have the TSP 100mm MAF. thanks
11-24-2012, 06:49 PM
#62
11 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: McAllen,TX
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
X2! I would also like info on this. What ratio are you guys using on the honeycomb screen?
11-24-2012, 07:00 PM
#63
I think the 4:1 is sufficient from what I've seen.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
11-25-2012, 04:13 PM
#64
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the 4:1 is sufficient from what I've seen.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
11-26-2012, 01:00 AM
#65
There is a difference in what a part can support and when it starts to become a bottleneck. Ive seen 1000 made through an LS6 intake before, doesn't mean it can support it. The stock LS1 MAF can accommodate a decent amount of power, but the gain by going to an 85mm or 100mm MAF is there also, even at a bolt on level
11-27-2012, 01:59 AM
#68
How much of a gain on say a 400rwhp car (typical weak heads/cam with mismatched parts on this site)?
Not being a dick, but if it's a noticeable difference, then I might have to spend the cash on it. If it's less than 5HP, then it's within the variance of the dyno, and I'd rather spend the money on something else.
Not being a dick, but if it's a noticeable difference, then I might have to spend the cash on it. If it's less than 5HP, then it's within the variance of the dyno, and I'd rather spend the money on something else.
