TSP 100mm MAF issues..keeps throwing code
not too jack this thread or anything but for the ones who have installed the screen, what ratio did you go with? i've been looking and not sure what would work best. i have the TSP 100mm MAF. thanks
11 Second Club
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: McAllen,TX
X2! I would also like info on this. What ratio are you guys using on the honeycomb screen?
I think the 4:1 is sufficient from what I've seen.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
I think the 4:1 is sufficient from what I've seen.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
Btw, why are you guys running 100mm MAFs? Are you at 550rwhp+? I mean the TSP kit is nice, has the 100mm aluminum housing, GM MAF slot sensor, and silicon coupler. But why this vs stock MAF or 1-bar SD tune? I've seen the stock MAF good upto 550rwhp.
There seems to be a lot of issues with the 100mm MAF kits, especially with older ECMs like in our cars.
There is a difference in what a part can support and when it starts to become a bottleneck. Ive seen 1000 made through an LS6 intake before, doesn't mean it can support it. The stock LS1 MAF can accommodate a decent amount of power, but the gain by going to an 85mm or 100mm MAF is there also, even at a bolt on level
Is it? I've seen 2 or 3 before and after dyno setups at 450+rwhp here on this site that showed absolutely nothing going from the stock GM to a 100mm MAF.
It only helps if there is a restriction.
It only helps if there is a restriction.
How much of a gain on say a 400rwhp car (typical weak heads/cam with mismatched parts on this site)?
Not being a dick, but if it's a noticeable difference, then I might have to spend the cash on it. If it's less than 5HP, then it's within the variance of the dyno, and I'd rather spend the money on something else.
Not being a dick, but if it's a noticeable difference, then I might have to spend the cash on it. If it's less than 5HP, then it's within the variance of the dyno, and I'd rather spend the money on something else.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
LOL. That's what I thought. There is some marketing crap on this site that makes people think a 4" opening must be better than a 3.5" opening even if the CFM of the 3.5" opening is greater than the CFM requirements of the engine.
