Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT LS1 EFI Intake Manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2012, 11:47 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
noonzor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just ordered my intake, tb, and rails. when i dyno ill post my numbers.
Old 05-19-2012, 11:57 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But with the correct set up the pro Flo is an excellent choice for a street car. If I was cam only I would not run the pro Flo.
Old 05-20-2012, 08:13 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
Ive done the testing personally on an engine dyno, and this is 100% correct.Doesnt make much sense, you were right......
I took it back because other than the testing you had done I had no evidence to see otherwise. But after doing some digging I too was confused. Edelbrocks press release of the dyno that showed a 30.6 hp gain listed the parts in the motor they used. The cam choice was a 207/220 IIRC on a 118.5 and CNCd LS1 heads with stock compression. The graph they posted didnt seem to lack low end. And the other example that I could validate was on a setup like mine which makes me want to run it now. An LS2 with CNCd 243s and a 224 cam, like I have, bolt ons and a 6 speed gained 40+ at the wheels over an LS2 intake, gained 10-15 tq under the curve and never lost low end and broadened the powerband. So you can see my confusion. The only other personal example I know of personally is my friend made 470 at the wheels on a stock headed MS4 cammed 346, but again with it being a MS4 low end is lacking already so thats not valid in my book.
Old 05-20-2012, 10:09 PM
  #24  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
UberTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Racetown Missouri
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a very close friend who has a moderate Heads/Cam setup and was running an LS6 intake on your typical run of the mill Fbody with bolts ons and DR's.

I'm not interested in spelling out every little detail, nor would he appreciate it, but its an MS3 car with wicked ported 243's with a stock bottom end. He went from a 7.03 1/8th mile ET to a 6.80 1/8th after the accompanying tune and picked up lots of area under the curve on the dynojet after 4400 rpm. Minor below 2500 loss, 10.7hp gain (avg) from 2500-4400, and after 4400 his peak gain was 24rwhp/19rwtq over a mega ported LS6 (I dont care to argue the validity of porting an LS6 intake since the argument was settled with the dyno gains of 7rwhp). I did the tune. I did the porting on his 243's. This information is beyond refute.

The pro flow xt rocks.

That is all!
Old 05-20-2012, 10:14 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
UberTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Racetown Missouri
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh and in case anyone wants to buy one, http://www.AJUSA.com has them the cheapest that ive seen, thats where I ordered mine from!

Old 05-20-2012, 10:32 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thank you for the info, this further reinforces my decision to buy this
Old 05-21-2012, 12:11 AM
  #27  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
UberTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Racetown Missouri
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You're welcome.

I think we'll see a lot of copying and improvement upon this design. I think the FAST is GREAT! .......for twice as much money.

I'm a poor gearhead, or atleast a frugal one. I see half as much money, just as much power and in addition to looking badass, and im all over it.

Time will prove this manifold to be a quality part.

This is coming from someone who was on the fast 78 (first production run) preorder list. Still have it!

Just as fast has improved their design by leaps and bounds, so will eddy. They've been around long enough to prove their resolve to me.

-Brett@AVPPT
Old 05-21-2012, 02:20 AM
  #28  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I'll believe your statements about them improving it when I see it. They introduced their heads over 10 years ago and they **** the bed, and have yet to step them up to compete.
Old 05-21-2012, 07:20 AM
  #29  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UberTruck
This information is beyond refute.
On a chassis dyno?
Old 05-29-2012, 05:47 PM
  #30  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
UberTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Racetown Missouri
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since I don't own edelbrock I can't offer any direction or sympathy regarding your distress regarding their heads.

Yes on a chassis dyno sir, hence the rear wheel suffixation, and personally I could give a **** about rwhp numbers since it was such a solid drop in ET. Dynos are not racetracks. Their the same thing as a timing light... Merely shop equipment.
Old 06-03-2012, 11:05 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been running the proflo for a couple weeks now. I picked up power everywhere. I also picked up a good amount of mid range. That's with the stock TB and Maf. I will dyno the car once I get a 90tb and bigger Mar and lid. This intake kicks ***.
Old 08-13-2012, 10:26 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
meine96ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am a firm believer that a company such as Edelbrock wouldnt make some trash that wont help with solid gains. I have ran a few of their products in the past with success.
Old 08-13-2012, 11:28 PM
  #33  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

You've obviously never ran their ls cylinder heads
Old 08-14-2012, 10:16 AM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
 
85Iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tn
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

So how bad is it to make it fit on an f-body? Really thinking about this intake
Old 08-14-2012, 10:24 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by meine96ws6
I am a firm believer that a company such as Edelbrock wouldnt make some trash that wont help with solid gains. I have ran a few of their products in the past with success.
Are you serious? Some of their older 5.0 stuff was TRASH.

Originally Posted by bww3588
You've obviously never ran their ls cylinder heads
Or their 5.0 performer heads...
Old 08-14-2012, 03:59 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Cosmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You need to cut the cowl. You will lose the stock wipers. I had this set up and loved it. I did not dyno after the intake swap but I felt the power pick up everywhere.
Old 08-21-2012, 11:29 PM
  #37  
Teching In
 
Tappet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Whitsundays AU
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its been a while and still havent decided on which intake, has anyone got comparison dyno charts on the same engine yet?
Old 10-01-2012, 11:55 PM
  #38  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
68Ash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Grass Valley
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just out of curiosity. to the fellows who are running these now, what were you running prior to the edelbrock? I'm in the process of trying to upgrade intakes for a Forced induction build and have been looking for an ls6 intake. these edelbrocks honestly aren't a whole lot more. Just wondering if it's really worth it?
Old 11-27-2012, 11:13 PM
  #39  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tweek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just swapped out my ls6 for a proflo in my car and love it. Feels stronger all throught the mid and upper rpms. I have a simple heads/cam lq4 in a fox body that weighs 2920 with me in it and I was honestly hopping for alittle low end loss. Wasnt enough to really notice by any means.
Old 11-28-2012, 12:05 AM
  #40  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Why would you hope for a low end loss?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.