why are the runners on a FAST intake so small??
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ok i sold my Weiand aluminum intake, it has 27mm runners on it,
i bought the FAST 92, i measured them and they are only at 24mm, even my heads are at about 25mm. why is this? shouldnt they be bigger? should i get the fast ported? and if i do, will the runners be opened up?
i bought the FAST 92, i measured them and they are only at 24mm, even my heads are at about 25mm. why is this? shouldnt they be bigger? should i get the fast ported? and if i do, will the runners be opened up?
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
this is what GM thought as well, which is why the Cathedral port heads were all based on high velocity vs pure volume. this is what allows the LS motors to get such great gas mileage. also if you can get the port velocity up, then you can shove the same amount of air in there then with a big port low velocity port.
#6
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also i,m prettysure the runners taper to progressively larger away from heads & have a bellmouth inlet to shove more air in .
I,m currently looking intothis subject as i,m planning on making my own intake.
I,m currently looking intothis subject as i,m planning on making my own intake.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
this is true to an extent. the FAST 90/92 intakes start to fall off after about 270-275cfm, and if you have heads that flow better then that, then porting will benefit them. but yes on an LS1 the FAST intake on ported heads is usually the restriction. porting could bring the stability up to 285-290 or so