ordering LSX tommorow 78 or 90?
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ordering LSX tommorow 78 or 90?
I'll be ordering a lsx intake and i'm still not sure which to get 78 or 90 mm? Next purchase will be Absolute's stage 2 or 2.5 LS6 heads[VERY SOON] along with my 231/237 cam which is already in. Do you think there will be any extra gain with the 90mm or should i save about 600 bucks and go with the 78mm. Thanks Shawn
#3
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WAHUSKER
My LSX developes power above 4k, if that tells you anything. And I believe the 90mm are intended for strokers....383, 427, etc.
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPANKY LS1
The price difference between the 78mm LSx and the 90mm LSx is less than $100, well worth it, IMO. Get the right intake now, and you can grow into it in the future.
Shawn
Shawn
#6
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hard to tell really from the few dyno results we have seen. But I would say for a bolt-on car, cam only setup, or a mild H/C setup the 78 mm would work, but for an all out H/C setup (S2 heads with big cam) or more I would go with the 90mm. If I had the funds I would be getting the 90mm one for my car. Of course this is just based on my own opinion Might want to check out some of the post in the dyno forum. I was impressed with one were there was little gain with just swapping intakes, but when some tuning adjustments were done after the new intake was on it picked up, which is what should really count anyways IMO. If I am going to spend that much money on a setup like that I would want to get every bit out of it, so that would include any tuning tweaks needed. Hope this helps. The search option might be helpful to you also.
Trending Topics
#8
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went from an LS1 to the LSX. I think there is more power there, but I need a tune from RWTD. I was getting KR & had to turn the timing way down & the PE way up. My dyno charts were almost identical up to 4k & then the hp started to climb. It was still going up when the car hit the limiter @ 6k. Before it started to flatten out at 5k. So I would think a 78 will work well for a cammed motor that spins to 7500rpm too.
A 90 is friggin HUGE! I never got a chance to flow meter my 78, but I heard they flow over 1200cfm. That should put a 90 up around 2000cfm. You'd need a LOT of cubes to suck that much air!!!
A 90 is friggin HUGE! I never got a chance to flow meter my 78, but I heard they flow over 1200cfm. That should put a 90 up around 2000cfm. You'd need a LOT of cubes to suck that much air!!!
#9
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going heads/cam I think you should go with the 90. The 78 has not proven to me yet to be worth it over a LS6 intake. Both will yeild gains, but if you want to go the cheaper route, I say skip the 78 and go with an LS6 intake.
#11
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
We have both in stock & on special in our induction post in the sponsors section. We picked up 9rwhp on Trevor's car with a 78mm
Jason
Jason
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#12
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
We have both in stock & on special in our induction post in the sponsors section. We picked up 9rwhp on Trevor's car with a 78mm
Jason
Jason
#15
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by jd13
destroyer, if you get the 90 you will only need some kind of ducting from the MAF to the TB. A 3" to 4" fernco hose seems to do the trick.
Jason
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#17
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
personally if you are looking to go with heads in the future I would go with the 90mm and get the 90mm TB. I'm planning on doing that in the future and I don't see that the 78mm is worth buying.
#18
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just ordered a 78mm from trevor @ texas speed and he told me to get the 78 vs the 90 unless i had a set up that needed very high rev's to make power due to less velosity from the 90mm. BTW thanks to trevor for chating with me for over a half hour and ansewering all of my ?'s GREAT service & price's
#20
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange county n.y.
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by n2o
90mm. You will kick yourself if you don't.