Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast 102 defect cause an issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2014 | 09:53 PM
  #1  
91foxbodygt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Exclamation Fast 102 defect cause an issue?

Have you guys ever seen a defect on the Fast 102s near the lower right area of the throttle body flange? It's behind the threaded insert. I received three of them with the same issue.

I contacted Fast and they said the crack causes no issues or vacuum leaks. What do you guys think?
Old 01-15-2014 | 10:07 PM
  #2  
RyanSws6's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
Default

Doesn't look like there's an issue there. If it is the hole directly behind the TB, outside of the seal, then I don't see an issue. It just seems like it allows the bolt to not bottom out.
Old 01-15-2014 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
91foxbodygt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Default

Yes, the hole is behind the throttle body.
Old 01-15-2014 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,255
Likes: 141
From: Pace, FL
Default

My 102 didn't have that issue. You say you've had three with that problem?
Old 01-16-2014 | 06:24 AM
  #5  
91foxbodygt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Default

Yep. And all three have that crack.
Old 01-16-2014 | 06:26 AM
  #6  
MMWS6's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

I think they are charging way too much to tolerate any defect.... period
Old 01-16-2014 | 06:55 AM
  #7  
Undertow74's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 13
From: Washington
Default

yea that's pretty shitty if you got 3 with the exact same crack. has to be a defect in the mold. even if it causes no issues, that's still crappy for a new product. Although I can say I had a issue with my first 102 also.

Once I installed it and turned the key for the first time I had a horrible vacuum leak. turns out he upper shell where it bolted to the lower shell by the right rear injector had somehow bowed out. Comp could not explain what had happened to it and determined it was not from over torqueing anything, and they actually sent me a brand new manifold free of cost once I shipped the other one back.
Old 01-16-2014 | 07:30 AM
  #8  
91foxbodygt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MMWS6
I think they are charging way too much to tolerate any defect.... period
Exactly. I asked for one without the crack and they said they all have one.
Old 01-16-2014 | 07:45 AM
  #9  
91foxbodygt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Question

Originally Posted by Undertow74
yea that's pretty shitty if you got 3 with the exact same crack. has to be a defect in the mold. even if it causes no issues, that's still crappy for a new product. Although I can say I had a issue with my first 102 also.

Once I installed it and turned the key for the first time I had a horrible vacuum leak. turns out he upper shell where it bolted to the lower shell by the right rear injector had somehow bowed out. Comp could not explain what had happened to it and determined it was not from over torqueing anything, and they actually sent me a brand new manifold free of cost once I shipped the other one back.
Did yours have a crack on it?
Old 01-16-2014 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 26
From: Northwest AR
Default

I would just rub a dab of JB weld over it and call it a day if they said it's normal
Old 01-16-2014 | 09:17 AM
  #11  
RyanSws6's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
Default

Mine doesn't look like that and I had one of the first batches that came out in 2009. I have the machine thread plug out the back, so mine doesn't look like that.
Old 01-16-2014 | 09:31 AM
  #12  
TXsilverado's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,713
Likes: 7
From: Humble Texas
Default

Originally Posted by MMWS6
I think they are charging way too much to tolerate any defect.... period
the fit/quality of the FAST 102 intake SUCKS imo. especially for the price they ask. have you ever seen a 102 intake under boost? it flexes and buckles like a lung with a turbo around 5psi. heard of it doing the same on large N/A combos. even heard of one blowing to pieces under around 20psi. too bad you car guys cant fit much under the cowl/hood without cutting up the car.
Old 01-16-2014 | 11:05 AM
  #13  
Grimes's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 2
From: Northern NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MMWS6
I think they are charging way too much to tolerate any defect.... period
Bingo, I mean if you are going to totally bend us over on price, your product better be perfect out of the box.
Old 01-16-2014 | 11:09 AM
  #14  
Undertow74's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 13
From: Washington
Default

No mine did not have said crack your talking about. It did blow out the right rear corner by the back injector where the 2 shells meet though and caused a nasty vacuum leak.
Old 01-16-2014 | 05:35 PM
  #15  
usdmholden's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

It looks like they are trapping gas in the mold during injection. It's a sign of poor quality control due to poor injection process control.

It may not make a difference, but it sure isn't a good selling point.

edit - alternatively, if the gas trap is behind an over molded insert, then possibly they have a venting issue at the insert where the gas would have normally escaped previously. Either way, the gas still shouldn't be trapping.
Old 01-16-2014 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
91foxbodygt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, TX
Default

I was told by Fast that the hole/crack is caused by machining when the threaded insert is installed. The mold is pretty thin on that corner, maybe that's why it goes through. If you look closely, you can see the yellow colored threaded insert in the picture.
Old 01-16-2014 | 07:12 PM
  #17  
RyanSws6's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
Default

I've had zero issues and fitted and looks great, but I'm N/A. Maybe they paid attention more early on. If I did have to do it over though, I'd leave my ported LS3 with a 92 on it. I wouldn't leave the 102 if I went FI.
Old 01-18-2014 | 09:09 PM
  #18  
peacesells63's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

If they did not have problems with the early intakes either they lengthened that sleeve or thinned out the casting in that area. Either way, I would not be happy about that. Maybe at 20% off, but not for what they cost.
Old 01-18-2014 | 09:10 PM
  #19  
peacesells63's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

It doesn't look like it would cause an issue though as far as a vac leak, but if the tb bolt was over tightened it could crack.
Old 01-19-2014 | 08:08 AM
  #20  
Paul Bell's Avatar
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,589
Likes: 54
From: NYC
Default

For the amount of money they charge for these manifolds, every last one should be the example of perfection in every way.

If my manifold looked like that, I'd send it back and demand one without the defect.


Quick Reply: Fast 102 defect cause an issue?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.