Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why 6.0s are so thirsty?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2017, 11:10 AM
  #321  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 244 Likes on 186 Posts
Default

They had some th400s with lockup.
Old 10-21-2017, 05:06 PM
  #322  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

So do you guys think 450ft lbs is doable at 2500 rpm with a 5.3 based 383ci?

#reason I asked I just seen a old traditional small block 383 do just that!!
Old 10-21-2017, 10:19 PM
  #323  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Here is a 3.0 making 500ft*lbs at 3200rpm:



So questions like, "can I make 450 ft*lbs with my 5.3L engine" are depressing
Old 10-21-2017, 10:22 PM
  #324  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 244 Likes on 186 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
Here is a 3.0 making 500ft*lbs at 3200rpm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRErhhA1o64


So questions like, "can I make 450 ft*lbs with my 5.3L engine" are depressing
That car cant tow a tampax.
Old 10-21-2017, 10:29 PM
  #325  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
That car cant tow a tampax.
Oh yeah I forgot half of this forum doesn't want a fast vehicle they just want to tow stuff.

Please be aware- Just because an engine makes a gob of torque doesn't make that torque useful for towing. The techWS6store guy is correct- towing isn't about torque as much as it is about achieving a steady state that is safe in the combustion chamber given the load (mass times gravity function with friction) with enough joules/second (watts) of output to actually be useful (which is given by displacement when there is no forced induction). Meow!
Old 10-21-2017, 10:36 PM
  #326  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,397
Received 3,221 Likes on 2,513 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
So questions like, "can I make 450 ft*lbs with my 5.3L engine" are depressing
Not everyone wants or needs forced induction, which IS needed to make that kind of torque in a 5.3. Quit being so narrow-minded. If that depresses you get a different hobby.
Old 10-22-2017, 07:37 AM
  #327  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
is about achieving a steady state that is safe in the combustion chamber given the load (mass times gravity function with friction) with enough joules/second (watts) of output to actually be useful (which is given by displacement when there is no forced induction). Meow!
God you fail at life.
Old 10-22-2017, 08:31 AM
  #328  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 2,261
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
God you fail at life.
You are just jealous. Torn up in jelly school

Rage on, little nugget
Old 10-22-2017, 08:45 AM
  #329  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Im surprised nobody haven't brought up a Toyota Tundra. They capable of pulling over 10000 lbs as well.
Old 10-22-2017, 02:47 PM
  #330  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 166 Likes on 116 Posts

Default

I think the 6.2's are rated for 11,000 or so
Old 10-22-2017, 02:51 PM
  #331  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
I think the 6.2's are rated for 11,000 or so
says 12,000
Old 10-22-2017, 05:30 PM
  #332  
Staging Lane
 
OLDWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Finally!! You is the ONLY one is thread that have claimed that kind of gas mileage out of a 6.0 motor period in a truck.
A couple of questions come to mind acourse.
What's your mileage while towing ?
What altitude are you at?
What octane gas you use ?
Mileage pulling the 22 ft wilderness camper you see in the background runs 12 to 14 MPAltitude here in town is 5,357 ft.

Truck normally operated between 5,000ft and 10,000ft.

Local reg gas is 85 octane.
Old 10-22-2017, 05:45 PM
  #333  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 166 Likes on 116 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
says 12,000
If you can, get a 6.2 6 speed with the max trailering package. And enjoy. Good tune is all hey need to rock your socks. Leave the modding to your car.

6.2 also comes with the 14 bolt which is a beast
Old 10-22-2017, 09:39 PM
  #334  
TECH Addict
 
RockinWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

You can easily DOUBLE the fuel mileage of any gasoline powered vehicle BUT you can't buy the parts to do it you must engineer everything yourself. Its called hot vapor cycle and it burns every drop of fuel you put into the engine completely.


While we are talking energy there is tech out there that could provide FREE electricity for ALL on the planet BUT you will never seen it. I have seen it and worked on it myself.

We all live in a buffet of bull pucky.
Old 10-22-2017, 10:28 PM
  #335  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 166 Likes on 116 Posts

Default

Hot fuel vapour is old tech really
Old 10-22-2017, 10:32 PM
  #336  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,397
Received 3,221 Likes on 2,513 Posts
Default

I think Smokey Yunick was working on that about 40 years ago.
Old 10-23-2017, 02:55 PM
  #337  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OLDWS6
Mileage pulling the 22 ft wilderness camper you see in the background runs 12 to 14 MPAltitude here in town is 5,357 ft.

Truck normally operated between 5,000ft and 10,000ft.

Local reg gas is 85 octane.
Those are impressive numbers.
Double the gas mileage of red rocket.
Old 10-24-2017, 08:46 AM
  #338  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
RedRocketZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Madrid, IA
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Those are impressive numbers.
Double the gas mileage of red rocket.
180 miles on my current tank of fuel and the DIC shows 12.4 MPG. No towing and 85% highway.
Old 10-24-2017, 09:00 AM
  #339  
Teching In
 
Brons2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is a Workhorse document detailing the power curves of a 6.0 (LQ4) and 8.1, pages 40 and 41.

http://workhorse.navistar.com/workho...Guide_2006.pdf
Old 10-24-2017, 09:03 AM
  #340  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

From oldws6 post he gets 12 mpg minimum pulling his 22ft camper vs your boat behind your truck struggling to get 8 mpg. Im guessing the elevation makes the difference along with the 5 speed manual vs the 4L80...


Quick Reply: Why 6.0s are so thirsty?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.