92mm vs 102 mm
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/20-l...ifolds-tested/
That intake will make you lose power compared to a Gen 4 truck intake at literally every single RPM you're going to use.
Trending Topics
Not to beat a dead horse, but any of those intakes will be terrible for your setup.
As for the 92 or 102. On your setup neither of those will really be needed. Both are bigger than you'll need. Wont really hurt, but larger than needed for sure.
The stock intake would be better than any of the sniper or high rams, and the trailblazer is better than the stock one. The trailblazer is without doubt the best option discussed in here so far.
If you really want to do an aftermarket intake a FAST intake would work great, but probably won't give you much of any over the trailblazer intake with your 5.3 and small cam and assume stock heads.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I appreciate the help-obviously this is my first ls build
I appreciate the help-obviously this is my first ls build
The way you look at boost is that you aren't adding boost, you are increasing boost. We already have 14 pounds of boost aka atmospheric pressure. When you add a turbo or blower you are increasing that boost that is already naturally there. Therefore you get the same, just more of it.
In other words your power curve will be affected by the intake you run. And it will be affected the same way NA or boost.
This can be manipulated by where you add the boost of course. But if you add for example 10 pounds from 1000 rpm to 6000 rpm your power curve should look the same. If you change the manifold the power curve will change and if you again add 10 pounds everywhere the curve will still look the same but the power will be higher. But if you lack power down low and add more boost down low then of course the curve will change.
To summarize with or without boost you will shift the power curve way further out with those intakes you mentioned.












