Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS6 intake vs stock

Old Sep 14, 2004 | 12:58 AM
  #1  
Trans Am Cam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default LS6 intake vs stock

ok somebody fill me with info on the ls6 intake manifold. vs stock.


what makes it better? does it just bolt right up.? What kind of gains should i expect (i currently have a mti t1 cam)

are they worht the cost?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 03:56 AM
  #2  
ThackerSS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
From: Palmetto, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Trans Am Cam
ok somebody fill me with info on the ls6 intake manifold. vs stock.


what makes it better? does it just bolt right up.? What kind of gains should i expect (i currently have a mti t1 cam)

are they worht the cost?

Flows better. Gets rid of the EGR fitting.

It is a direct bolt on, as long as you get the coolant lines.

On a bone stock motor, it is good for 5-15 rwhp. On a modded motor such as yours, you can expect 10-20.

Definite worthwhile mod and definetely something you need to look into if you wish to get the most power out of your set up.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 04:26 AM
  #3  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Basically flows more air=more power.

This will be moved to external forum
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #4  
jrp's Avatar
jrp
SN95 Director
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 7
From: Valencia, Ca
Default

exibit A
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
Trans Am Cam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

what about the LSX mainfold?..it looks intresting, but also looks cheap.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #6  
pimpmaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Looks cheap!? It's stronger, stiffer, and lighter than the OEM material. That and for the price, I don't think I could ever consider it to look cheap. As far as it's usefulness for your application, It should provide more gains than the LS6 intake. Exactly how much, I'm not at liberty to say...
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #7  
Trans Am Cam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Exactly how much, I'm not at liberty to say...


Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #8  
Trans Am Cam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

As far as it's usefulness for your application, It should provide more gains than the LS6 intake
whats makes you say that?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #9  
cyphur's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

um b/c the lsx flows better then the ls6 all across the curve?? it was specifically designed to flow better then the ls6, otherwise wtf was the point of making it? and for $700+ it damn well better. the bigger the cam, the larger your cid, the larger gain(it can feed a lot more air then the ls6, so the bigger setups can take better advantage of this). plus it can be port-matched for even better results.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #10  
chpmnsws6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 2
From: Springfield IL
Default

Originally Posted by Trans Am Cam
whats makes you say that?
prolly doesn't know....
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:03 PM
  #11  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

The LSX doesn't make near enough power to be worth the money on a stock cube engine.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:08 PM
  #12  
pimpmaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by ramairstyle00
prolly doesn't know....
Hehe, I haven't a clue as to how much more hp it'd be worth on his motor. I suck at estimating hp.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 06:28 AM
  #13  
A-Bomb's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/Houston
Default

how can you visually tell one from the other? does anybody know? pics please if possible.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #14  
chris2000ss's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Morrisdale,PA=home & Asheville,NC=work
Default

Originally Posted by A-Bomb
how can you visually tell one from the other? does anybody know? pics please if possible.
ls1= egr protrusion

the ls6 intake has no egr...
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #15  
TransAm52804's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Davenport, Iowa
Default

So are you guys basically saying that a car that will eventually have all the bolt-ons and a cam, would benefit from the LS6 as bang-for-the-buck since the LSX isn't worth it over the LSX? I need to know because I plan on getting an upgraded intake manifold eventually, and will have the usual bolt-ons, cam, etc and wanna know which to spend my money on so I don't get screwed.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #16  
WAHUSKER's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, WA
Default

From what I've seen & read, the LSX is worth about twice the gain the LS6 will give you. To begin with they were also about tiwce the price ($800 vs $400). Now that there are used LS6 manifolds available, you can find better deals on them. Basically, the higher you go in the rpm band, and the bigger your demand is for air, the more gains you will get out of either. Right now with your setup you could see 10hp out of the LS6, and 20 out of the LSX (provided you have a good set of headers).
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #17  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
um b/c the lsx flows better then the ls6 all across the curve?? it was specifically designed to flow better then the ls6, otherwise wtf was the point of making it? and for $700+ it damn well better. the bigger the cam, the larger your cid, the larger gain(it can feed a lot more air then the ls6, so the bigger setups can take better advantage of this). plus it can be port-matched for even better results.
I'd assume you're talking about the 90mm version (along with the costly and required 90mm TB) and not the 78mm...please do specify when discussing LSX intakes.
I don't think the 78mm offers nearly enough over the LS6 intake (in most applications at least) to justify it's price.


Originally Posted by chris2000ss
ls1= egr protrusion
the ls6 intake has no egr...
Unless of course it's an SLP or Lingenfelter modified version that has the EGR provision.
Also look for the flat bottom (LS6) versus the 'wavey' bottom (LS1 intake).
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.