Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

True Duals vs Y-pipe, single muffler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2005, 03:54 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
01_ram-air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Valrico, FL
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default True Duals vs Y-pipe, single muffler

Why is it that more people don't run true duals? Is it a money thing or are there advantages to running the Y-pipe to a single muffler gimmick? I wouldn't think that there is a back-pressure issue with the LS1s, but I don't know that much about them, so there could be. Is there a true performance difference running true duals? I know, a lot of questions, but I'm getting ready to do my exhaust and want to know what the Best way for me to go is. What I'm looking at doing is getting everything set up where I can just throw on a set of headers and not have to change anything else with the exhaust. What's the difference between running an X pipe vs a H pipe? Any suggestions on what you guys think I should go with would be welcomed as well. I'm a racer, not a waxah, so performance comes before sound in my book.
Old 12-13-2005, 04:03 PM
  #2  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Cause they are pricey for starters. And most people don't know what they are missing out on having a y-pipe! j/k

I would have to say ultimately because of price/fittament. Back pressure will not matter. What you are lookng for is more velocity.

H-pipe: You will have more down low, and it will have a deeper tone.
X-pipe: You are gonna be a top-end performer for the most part, and it will sound a tad different from an H.
Honestly I can't tell just by listening on identical setups minus the H or X choice, but that might be due to the fact that I have been around to many loud instances my entire life and have terrible hearing.
hope this helps ya out some.

I went with the 2.5 true duals through twister mufflers. I have quite a bit of pull in the 3800+ range too. Are you A4 or M6?

Last edited by orangeapeel; 12-13-2005 at 04:10 PM.
Old 12-13-2005, 04:09 PM
  #3  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

BTW: Your are F'in quick for being damn near stock! nice times.
Unless by juice you mean a 75 dry shot.
Old 12-13-2005, 04:28 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
01_ram-air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Valrico, FL
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
BTW: Your are F'in quick for being damn near stock! nice times.
Unless by juice you mean a 75 dry shot.
Thanks, I'm an A4, big Stall (ST Yank 4000) and spraying a wet 100 shot. Thanks for your input too
Old 12-13-2005, 04:54 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (64)
 
dschmittie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

a lot of people probably don't have true dual's like me for state inspection reason and needing the exhaust to exit from under the body of the car
Old 12-13-2005, 07:00 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
JBIRD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange Park/ Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dschmittie1
a lot of people probably don't have true dual's like me for state inspection reason and needing the exhaust to exit from under the body of the car
Thats true. Also, because alot of exhaust shops will tell you it cant be done, or that it can but it will cost alot of $$$. Some people are just a little apprehensive ordering the parts and having it custom fit, they'd rather just buy something made for the car.
Old 12-13-2005, 08:43 PM
  #7  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Over the axle and out the back true duals are expensive.
Dumped at the axle TD's are lots of fun at first, but grow tiresome for some people (like me).

I went from Y to X to Y again, only to see the greatest dyno numbers being put out by my final Y-pipe setup (QTP HVMC LT's -> QTP ORY -> SLP 2OTL catback).

Duals dumped are awesome. You also smell like fuell when you arrive at work in the morning (take that as a good thing or a bad, hehe).
Old 12-13-2005, 10:15 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
tillery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

me slp headers, ory into a flo y (flo-y300400) 4" I pipe back into a same flo y to split at rear into sweetthunders. Also to pass visual insp. I have my mufflers installed in oversized tips that resemble stock WS-6 tips for a "stock" apearance.
Old 12-14-2005, 04:52 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01_ram-air
Why is it that more people don't run true duals? Is it a money thing or are there advantages to running the Y-pipe to a single muffler gimmick? I wouldn't think that there is a back-pressure issue with the LS1s, but I don't know that much about them, so there could be. Is there a true performance difference running true duals? I know, a lot of questions, but I'm getting ready to do my exhaust and want to know what the Best way for me to go is. What I'm looking at doing is getting everything set up where I can just throw on a set of headers and not have to change anything else with the exhaust. What's the difference between running an X pipe vs a H pipe? Any suggestions on what you guys think I should go with would be welcomed as well. I'm a racer, not a waxah, so performance comes before sound in my book.
Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
Do you need to run a X or H pipe - No.

Is it recommended that you do - Yes.

Why?

Because a mid pipe will do potentially two things.

1. It will lower the db noise level produced by the system. This is a good thing.

2. You may see a gain with a mid pipe. Check the sticky out about mods/exhausts it has some good info from David Vizard.

Basically they tested a load of setups, 50% of the time there was NO change in BHP, the other 50% saw an increase.

So you certainly won't loose anything by adding one, and with the fact it will reduce the db output I see no reason not to run one. If you pick up a few more horses on the way, then great.

As a rule of thumb it is generally accepted that the H pipe will sound deeper and produce better low end grunt, while the X pipe will sound more exotic and make better high rpm power. Either way it will likely be pretty even between them.

There's several good companies out there, Magnaflow make a nice X pipe. Stick to 2.5" tubing unless you are planning on 550-600bhp then 3" will be a benefit.
As for duals vs Y, it appears to be a never ending debate.

In essence, a GOOD Y setup will match a GOOD dual setup. A Y pipe scavenges just like an X pipe does, so you still have the benefit.

The only problems arise with Y setups when the amount of gas flowing down the tubing becomes too great and the tubing itsefl becomes the limitation.

A 3" Y setup is more than good enough for a bolt on LS1, even a mild cam setup will not be a problem.

But another problem is the muffler, as the gases from all 8 cylinders go through a single muffler. Many after market mufflers do not flow well enough. Flowmaster being most notible. The Hooker Aerochamber is good for upto 375bhp before the flow rate exceeds the muffler.

Borla are generally very good, as are Stainless Works and GMMG. and I'm pretty sure the SLP LM flows pretty good.

Remember many race and rally cars use a Y setup over duals, because they are generally easier to route, lighter and cuase less restrictions with the rear suspension setup.

Duals, are best if you custom fab them, so do not get them until you replace the headers. Normal Y Catbacks are bolt ons so you can get one know and dot the headers and mid pipe later without needing to fabricate anything.

My recommendations for good setups would be:

Headers:
-Cheap and cheerful, Pacesetters coated. Good quality and fit for the money.
-Edlebrock headers, coated. More money than the Pacesetters but look nice.
-Stainless Works, very high quality in stainless steel.
-QTP or Kooks, these seem to be the favoured as the premium setup. I doubt they are really any better though, they just happen to be very good and in stainless steel.

Mid pipes:
-If you are going for a Y and Pacesetters then TSP (Texas Speed & Performance) offer their own Y pipe, and a catted variant. Great value for money.
-All of the other header makers offer Y pipes (not always availble with CATS though). 3" would be my choice, although a 2.5" Y would lend better for a low down torquey engine, but at the sacrifice of top end power.
-Magnaflow make a nice X pipe if you plan on duals.

Catbacks:
-Stainless Works Chambered
-GMMG
-SLP LM
-Borla

CATS:
If you plan on high power and wants CATS (either Y or dual) then Random Technology 7000 Series Metal Matrix CATS are what you want, they out flow many mufflers and will be fine on motors of 550bhp.

Mufflers:
To be used in a dual setup or an addition to a Y setup.
-Classic Chambered Exhaust Powersticks
-Stainless Works chambered mufflers
-Borla XR1 series
-Sprialflow

Complete systems

Budget Y:
Pacesetter long tube headers
TSP Catted Y
SLP Loud Mouth

This should sound good, and flow well enough for a solid bolt on car

Premium Y:
Stainless Works Long tube headers
Stainless Works 3" Y and Random Technology 7000 Series CATS
Stainless Works chambered exhaust

This will be fine on a h/c engine or even FI and sound and look great.

Budget dual:
Pacesetter long tubes
Hi-flow cats
Magnaflow X pipe (2.5")
Powerstick mufflers x 2
2.5 tubing and some tips

Will sound nice, and flow well. Run over the axle and out the back.

Premium duals:
Stainless Works long tube headers
Random Technology 7000 Series CATS
Magnaflow X pipe (2.5")
Stainless Works Chambered mufflers and tips.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp
exhaust layout1.bmp (67.6 KB, 3033 views)
Old 12-14-2005, 06:00 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Manic Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Excellent post from the Brit.

Vernon
Old 12-14-2005, 08:51 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
 
you2slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I went with a Y setup because a true dual dump is not practical for my car. I travel to clients' homes and can not have a race car show up at their door. I have to appear somewhat refined. I really wanted a dual set up, though.
Old 12-14-2005, 09:15 AM
  #12  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I see a lot of conjecture floating around in here with little proof to back it up. Seriously. Until someone does back to back to back (and possibly even more) dynos with each of the setups mentioned above, all tuned to their max potential, everyone is just taking a shot in the dark. Stop quoting theory. Please.
Old 12-14-2005, 11:03 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
I see a lot of conjecture floating around in here with little proof to back it up. Seriously. Until someone does back to back to back (and possibly even more) dynos with each of the setups mentioned above, all tuned to their max potential, everyone is just taking a shot in the dark. Stop quoting theory. Please.
It's not just theory, it's physics.

Check the sticky out about exhaust, it has some good info in there, also use Google and search for David Vizard (he has several books in publication).

And yes there is always conjecture, but that's because too many people beleive what one person says instead of actually researching it.
Old 12-14-2005, 11:49 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
01_ram-air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Valrico, FL
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
As for duals vs Y, it appears to be a never ending debate.

In essence, a GOOD Y setup will match a GOOD dual setup. A Y pipe scavenges just like an X pipe does, so you still have the benefit.

The only problems arise with Y setups when the amount of gas flowing down the tubing becomes too great and the tubing itsefl becomes the limitation.

A 3" Y setup is more than good enough for a bolt on LS1, even a mild cam setup will not be a problem.

But another problem is the muffler, as the gases from all 8 cylinders go through a single muffler. Many after market mufflers do not flow well enough. Flowmaster being most notible. The Hooker Aerochamber is good for upto 375bhp before the flow rate exceeds the muffler.

Borla are generally very good, as are Stainless Works and GMMG. and I'm pretty sure the SLP LM flows pretty good.

Remember many race and rally cars use a Y setup over duals, because they are generally easier to route, lighter and cuase less restrictions with the rear suspension setup.

Duals, are best if you custom fab them, so do not get them until you replace the headers. Normal Y Catbacks are bolt ons so you can get one know and dot the headers and mid pipe later without needing to fabricate anything.

My recommendations for good setups would be:

Headers:
-Cheap and cheerful, Pacesetters coated. Good quality and fit for the money.
-Edlebrock headers, coated. More money than the Pacesetters but look nice.
-Stainless Works, very high quality in stainless steel.
-QTP or Kooks, these seem to be the favoured as the premium setup. I doubt they are really any better though, they just happen to be very good and in stainless steel.

Mid pipes:
-If you are going for a Y and Pacesetters then TSP (Texas Speed & Performance) offer their own Y pipe, and a catted variant. Great value for money.
-All of the other header makers offer Y pipes (not always availble with CATS though). 3" would be my choice, although a 2.5" Y would lend better for a low down torquey engine, but at the sacrifice of top end power.
-Magnaflow make a nice X pipe if you plan on duals.

Catbacks:
-Stainless Works Chambered
-GMMG
-SLP LM
-Borla

CATS:
If you plan on high power and wants CATS (either Y or dual) then Random Technology 7000 Series Metal Matrix CATS are what you want, they out flow many mufflers and will be fine on motors of 550bhp.

Mufflers:
To be used in a dual setup or an addition to a Y setup.
-Classic Chambered Exhaust Powersticks
-Stainless Works chambered mufflers
-Borla XR1 series
-Sprialflow

Complete systems

Budget Y:
Pacesetter long tube headers
TSP Catted Y
SLP Loud Mouth

This should sound good, and flow well enough for a solid bolt on car

Premium Y:
Stainless Works Long tube headers
Stainless Works 3" Y and Random Technology 7000 Series CATS
Stainless Works chambered exhaust

This will be fine on a h/c engine or even FI and sound and look great.

Budget dual:
Pacesetter long tubes
Hi-flow cats
Magnaflow X pipe (2.5")
Powerstick mufflers x 2
2.5 tubing and some tips

Will sound nice, and flow well. Run over the axle and out the back.

Premium duals:
Stainless Works long tube headers
Random Technology 7000 Series CATS
Magnaflow X pipe (2.5")
Stainless Works Chambered mufflers and tips.
Very good post, thanks for the info. Now, you just made the decision harder.
Old 12-14-2005, 12:12 PM
  #15  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
It's not just theory, it's physics.

Check the sticky out about exhaust, it has some good info in there, also use Google and search for David Vizard (he has several books in publication).

And yes there is always conjecture, but that's because too many people beleive what one person says instead of actually researching it.
Even in your own post where you say the Hooker Aero Chamber is limited to 375 bhp...where did that number come from? There are a good number of people I know back in my old home state of Indiana running the Aero Chambers on some pretty stout setups (heads/cam), and only losing ~5 RWHP on a dyno to a cutout.

You made a good post, but there is still a good deal of generalization where plain physics isn't filling the gap (see above paragraph).

Another big one I see on here is that 2.5" true duals is only good to about 450 HP (not sure if that is bhp or RWHP).

There is some good info on this site, but there is also a lot of rubbish. I'm just trying to keep everything factual.
Old 12-14-2005, 03:21 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
Even in your own post where you say the Hooker Aero Chamber is limited to 375 bhp...where did that number come from?
No notlimited, will be fine upto that bhp lvel, beyond that it will become a restriction.

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
There are a good number of people I know back in my old home state of Indiana running the Aero Chambers on some pretty stout setups (heads/cam), and only losing ~5 RWHP on a dyno to a cutout.
Sadly that doesn't prove a great deal, as cut outs can cause a loss or limited gains. There are two sides to exhaust performance:

1. Flow rate
2. Exhaust pressure wave

The cut outs would certainly affect the exhaust pressure wave.

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
You made a good post, but there is still a good deal of generalization where plain physics isn't filling the gap (see above paragraph).
No, I'm sure physics can explain it all. However it gets far too complex to explain in just a few posts. Plus I'm not a Physicist just an enthusiast.

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
Another big one I see on here is that 2.5" true duals is only good to about 450 HP (not sure if that is bhp or RWHP).
Not sure where you read this, the closest I said was if you are planning on 550-600+bhp then 3" duals would be more beneficial. And it would always be engine flywheel BHP, as measuring BHP at the rear wheels makes it inaaurate at the as flow rate would be much higher.

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
There is some good info on this site, but there is also a lot of rubbish. I'm just trying to keep everything factual.
There, is. But physics is physics regardless. And much of the info where I have said look is well respected.

Look at this thread: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139142

Check out posts 6 & 7, and posts 13 onwards.

David Vizard is very well respected in the industry, has published many books, writes for one of the hot rod magazines, has race proven history, and has helped design mufflers (Spiral flow if memory serves).


This 4-inch Borla muffler topped out the UNCC flow bench. Readings were taken at 6 inches of depression and corrected to 20.3 inches (10.5 inches Mercury). The result: 1100 cfm!

This is what Hooker's Aero Chamber muffler looks like inside. Our tests showed these well-made 2.5-inch units to be good for no loss on a 375hp engine while delivering a conservatively sporty, yet authoritative, exhaust note.
If you can determin the flow rate of a muffler, then you can caculate whether it will be a flowrestriction.

According to David Vizard, use 2.2cfm per 1HP

So the Borla flowed 1100cfm.

If the engin is producing 500bhp.

500 x 2.2 = 1100cfm, so you could put this in a Y setup and it would not restrict flow (provided the tubing of the Y flowed at least 1100cfm).

On a dual setup, each bank and muffler only has to handle the gas flow for 4 cylinders instead of 8. So on our 500bhp engine, the muffler only has to handle 250bhp, or 250 x 2.2 = 550cfm. This is where dual setups re beneficial, as you can use lower spec parts and achieve the same results. With a Y setup you needto make sure it can handle the gas flow without restriction.

If the Aerochamber muffler from Hooker is good for 375, then 375 x 2.2 = 825cfm, not bad but limiting with a LS1, as 400bhp is pretty easy from them.
Old 12-14-2005, 03:25 PM
  #17  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not all Mufflers have diffusers, baffles and chambers however.
Look through a Magnaflow 4x9 oval or an SLP 2OTL muffler and all you see is whatever is on the other side of the perf. pipe (i.e. asphalt, hand, feet, etc., hehe).
Mufflers should not be out of the question for a high flow design.
Old 12-14-2005, 08:42 PM
  #18  
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

y pipe and catback..... good and quiet.
noise attracts other people.
unless its a track car, then duals dumped gets it done.
Old 12-14-2005, 10:51 PM
  #19  
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBlurLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have duals, I love the sound better than any system I've ever heard on a street car (especially with the cam).

I have duals, I hate the interior noise when I'm trying to listen to music or talk to my girl.



You will think the duals are the best thing in the world for a few weeks, and everytime someone compliments you. But they dont realize that you have to drive it every day and can't hear yourself think. Duals with an x-pipe are going to flow and make more power than any other, and most likley sound better, but you are going to have to give up comfort, which will start to **** you off I promise. I would stick with a catback, and put bigger jets in the nozzles if you want more power

Ride in someones car who has them before you make a decision. I'm currently trying to change my setup, check my thread in this section I started yesterday. Its got a pretty crazy idea for the best of both worlds.
Old 12-14-2005, 11:32 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
I see a lot of conjecture floating around in here with little proof to back it up. Seriously. Until someone does back to back to back (and possibly even more) dynos with each of the setups mentioned above, all tuned to their max potential, everyone is just taking a shot in the dark. Stop quoting theory. Please.
i lost 2moh in the 1/8 going from, 3" duals to ory and hooker catback

i knew as soon as i drove down the road for the first time i had made a mistake getting rid of teh duals

my car used to just keep pulling up top but with the y pipe and catback it just gave out early compared to the duals


Quick Reply: True Duals vs Y-pipe, single muffler



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.