Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 03:16 AM
  #1  
u8dusst's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

Does it make you run richer or leaner?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 03:18 AM
  #2  
Bad02WS6's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

Leaner for sure.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 03:20 AM
  #3  
u8dusst's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Bad02WS6:
<strong>Leaner for sure.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Hmm. Has anyone ever ran into any problems running a little leaner with a descreened MAF?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 04:59 AM
  #4  
AlonzoVersion 1.0's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth,TX
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

It depends on the car.98's pick up but anything after that year was a hit or miss mod and what I mean is some picked up power and some lost power and some didnt gain anything but that was with changing to an aftermarket maf sensor or just maf sensor ported ends.Try it its easy to put back in the car.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 06:42 PM
  #5  
LS1 JAY's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Aub, Fl
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Alonzo:
<strong>It depends on the car.98's pick up but anything after that year was a hit or miss mod and what I mean is some picked up power and some lost power and some didnt gain anything but that was with changing to an aftermarket maf sensor or just maf sensor ported ends.Try it its easy to put back in the car.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You could run into a problem with any year LS1. My '98 pinged like a $@#*% with ported ends! ported MAF's have also been linked to transmission problems with A4 cars since a ported MAF lowers the line pressure to the transmission!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 10:14 PM
  #6  
AlonzoVersion 1.0's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth,TX
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by LS1JAY:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Alonzo:
<strong>It depends on the car.98's pick up but anything after that year was a hit or miss mod and what I mean is some picked up power and some lost power and some didnt gain anything but that was with changing to an aftermarket maf sensor or just maf sensor ported ends.Try it its easy to put back in the car.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You could run into a problem with any year LS1. My '98 pinged like a $@#*% with ported ends! ported MAF's have also been linked to transmission problems with A4 cars since a ported MAF lowers the line pressure to the transmission!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">See thats what I am saying some cars like it and some hate it.You are the first 98 I have heard of that actually pinged after doing it.Well live and learn.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 10:21 PM
  #7  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 6
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

On my 01 Hawk it went leaner,then the computer compensated and WOT went to pig rich(10.5-1)That was something I wished I never did.
You get better results with a MAFT.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 11:20 PM
  #8  
u8dusst's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

What about the new SLP MAF? Am I beter off just keeping my stock descreened and getting a MAFT? Is the new SLP unit any good?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 04:14 AM
  #9  
Bad02WS6's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

The SLP 85mm MAF will not do much for a nearly stock car. I beleive it is stock calibrated, just bigger. If you ask me. Stock calibration is a good thing, That way you have a better idea where you are starting from. My SLP MAF works realy well, But I also have a MAFT.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 07:38 AM
  #10  
Bull_in_a_china_shop's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Metamora, IL
Default Re: Descreening the MAF, richer or leaner?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by u8dusst:
<strong>What about the new SLP MAF? Am I beter off just keeping my stock descreened and getting a MAFT? Is the new SLP unit any good?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">get a maft, pretty cheap and adjustable as more mods come. Autotap helps too
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.