lsx24

iTrader: (45)

Lol you know what, I thought about it seriously, and just couldn't because I had to work, without any days off and even though I am running with purely caffeen and donuts, literaly it seemed I couldn't take one, but then again, whatever doesn't kill you, well you know how the old cliche goes.

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

In all seriousness though, bolton scientology is really more subjective than it is anything else. In fact, after you take into account what exactly it is that is increasing horsepower in any one area, and then factor in the cost effectiveness of the modification in regards to the availability and/or effectiveness [if that is one of the predetermined priorities of the project], there can be endless debate about the usefullness of an arbritrary project component or what if any component by itself will change the performance in a particular combination. Keep in mind area under the curve is what matters, as was stated in the sticky if I'm not mistaken accidentally.

Anyway, I digress. If you would like to see more information about my paricular bolton combination feel free to navigate to this thread located here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/485371-what-s-wrong-these-numbers.html
where you will see my dyno graphs and my hypothesis on why I'm definately making or not making the appropriately anticipated power numbers.

bad6as

iTrader: (17)

so you made 350 with bolt ons with out long tube headers?

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

Yep, that's right I did.

bad6as

iTrader: (17)

so then with long tubes 375 could be done

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

All motor baby.

bad6as

iTrader: (17)

so aprox 375 rwhp and about how much rwtq could be reached with a all bolt on SI m6

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

That's a great question. I'd say about the same; if you think not, it isn't a question of if, but when anymore.

Powered By V8

iTrader: (2)

Anyone reminded of the Architect from The Matrix?


Sorry bud, just bustin' your chops

staringback05

iTrader: (8)

uh yea, im kinda lost in the mumbo jumbo, doesnt bolt on mean exactly what it says? "bolt on" and theres alot of bolt ons that dont do jack...ie that "upgrade maf" thats about as usefull as the TB bypass..ehh

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

I know what you mean, in fact, the combination of boltons is somewhat of an art, with regards to combining the appropriate components to fullfil the plan. However the big picture remains without boltons you just have bolt lol just kidding.

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

Well, actually, I'll be running a cam before long tubes--not sure which but hopefully a good one--for a cam-only CA emissions vehicle; in other words LT's when they come should be that much more beneficial.

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

If you remove all of the variables with regards to boltons, and now I'm saying all of the variables with hp potential--a custom plan for each particular situation technically speaking--what remains is usually the right thing to do alternatively.

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

Besides the characteristic of linear increases in performance, what it is really is an appropriate gain of combinatorics.

Mach 5.7

taintedmeat said:

"I'm a Michael Bolton fan, I celebrate the man's entire catalog. For my money, it doesn't get any better than when he sings "When a man loves a woman."


I'm just here to award taintedmeat 10 points for the Office Space quote. Here ya' go - 10 points. Collect 'em all. :-)

WILWAXU

iTrader: (6)

When someone has something other than quatum physics, start a new thread.

This area is for actual fact based tech.