Professional Products Intake Manifold
04-27-2006, 01:24 PM
#42
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got off the phone with Professional Products.
They haven't finished all their testing, but they did say the 52064 manifold out performed the Weiand across the board, particulary in the low to mid range. No results against a fast 90 set up yet. They expect full product testing to be complete in the next week or two.
They haven't finished all their testing, but they did say the 52064 manifold out performed the Weiand across the board, particulary in the low to mid range. No results against a fast 90 set up yet. They expect full product testing to be complete in the next week or two.
04-28-2006, 04:04 PM
#44
Originally Posted by TAQuickness
I just got off the phone with Professional Products.
They haven't finished all their testing, but they did say the 52064 manifold out performed the Weiand across the board, particulary in the low to mid range. No results against a fast 90 set up yet. They expect full product testing to be complete in the next week or two.
They haven't finished all their testing, but they did say the 52064 manifold out performed the Weiand across the board, particulary in the low to mid range. No results against a fast 90 set up yet. They expect full product testing to be complete in the next week or two.
04-29-2006, 03:15 AM
#46
Originally Posted by The Alchemist
My interest is how it performs compared to a LS6 intake. I don't want to hear about flow numbers, I want to see a dyno graph of a heads / cam / headers car with a LS6 then this intake.
05-02-2006, 06:40 PM
#53
TECH Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC STATE
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stone0fFire
its metal so you can strap a bag of ice on it before you make your run.
05-03-2006, 12:25 PM
#55
My thoughts.....
First why in the hell would the compair it to the least used manifold in the LS1 market?
I understand them compairing against it for a heat soak comparision but not for a flow or HP comparision.
2nd thought. If they used a stock LS2 manifold to compete against their 96mm version I sure hope they would win as the stock LS2 sucks.
They should grab a LS6 manifold, a fast 90mm manifold and a LS2 90mm manifold and compair their 85 version vs the LS6 manifold.
Then compair their 96 vs the fast 90/LS2 90.
If they can match the LS6 it will be great and if they could even come very close to the fast 90 then that would also be nice.
First why in the hell would the compair it to the least used manifold in the LS1 market?
I understand them compairing against it for a heat soak comparision but not for a flow or HP comparision.
2nd thought. If they used a stock LS2 manifold to compete against their 96mm version I sure hope they would win as the stock LS2 sucks.
They should grab a LS6 manifold, a fast 90mm manifold and a LS2 90mm manifold and compair their 85 version vs the LS6 manifold.
Then compair their 96 vs the fast 90/LS2 90.
If they can match the LS6 it will be great and if they could even come very close to the fast 90 then that would also be nice.
