LS6 Manifold vs Professional Products Typhoon
#1
LS6 Manifold vs Professional Products Typhoon
Everyone has been asking for a direct comparison between the LS6 intake and the Professional Products Typhoon intake. Also there were a couple of forum members who thought the Typhoon might make more power by grinding away the inner lip on the runners.
We have an LS1 dyno engine that we used in originally developing the Typhoon and the full specs on it are listed below. We took one of our
Typhoon manifolds out of the box, plus an additional Typhoon that we ground away the lip on, per some of the suggestions made here, plus an LS6 manifold we bought from a Chevy dealer, and delivered them to Mitech Racing Engines in Placentia, CA, who does all our dyno work.
We had our new 85mm throttle body that we used on all three configurations. The short story is that the unmodified Typhoon made 17.7 more horsepower than the LS6 at 6,700 rpm. The cam is only rated to 6,000 rpm and Mike LeFevers, at Mitech, didn't feel comfortable taking the engine any higher than 6,700 rpm. It was interesting that looking at the dyno chart, the LS6 appears to be starting to nose over at 6,700 but the Typhoon is still climbing. So with a bigger cam, or least one with better springs that would rev higher, I suspect the difference might even be greater than the 17.7 hp we got.
It's also worth noting that FAST is claiming that their manifold is 15 hp better than an LS6.
When we put the modified manifold on, we lost 2 to 3 hp. So that modification doesn't really do anything.
Here is the data on the mods on the dyno engine with links to the sites where you can get more info.
Super Flow Engine Dyno
Heads = AFR heads – # 205
http://www.airflowresearch.com/
Cam = Lunati # 55004
Advertised Duration IN/EX: 283/283
Duration @.050 IN/EX: 221/221
Gross Valve Lift IN/EX: .558"/.558"
Lobe Sep Angle / Intake Ctr Line: 114/110
Valve Lash IN/EX: Hyd/Hyd
RPM Range: 2500-6000
http://www.holley.com/index.asp?division=Lunati
Short Block = Stock LS1 Crate engine
http://www.gmgoodwrench.com/perfpartsjsp/home.jsp
ECU = Reworked by FastChip
http://www.fastchip.com/
Headers = Hooker Super Comp Long tube headers
http://www.holley.com/index.asp?division=Hooker
Intake = Professional Products # 52060
www.professional-products.com
Throttle Body = Professional Products 85mm LS1
www.professional-products.com
We have an LS1 dyno engine that we used in originally developing the Typhoon and the full specs on it are listed below. We took one of our
Typhoon manifolds out of the box, plus an additional Typhoon that we ground away the lip on, per some of the suggestions made here, plus an LS6 manifold we bought from a Chevy dealer, and delivered them to Mitech Racing Engines in Placentia, CA, who does all our dyno work.
We had our new 85mm throttle body that we used on all three configurations. The short story is that the unmodified Typhoon made 17.7 more horsepower than the LS6 at 6,700 rpm. The cam is only rated to 6,000 rpm and Mike LeFevers, at Mitech, didn't feel comfortable taking the engine any higher than 6,700 rpm. It was interesting that looking at the dyno chart, the LS6 appears to be starting to nose over at 6,700 but the Typhoon is still climbing. So with a bigger cam, or least one with better springs that would rev higher, I suspect the difference might even be greater than the 17.7 hp we got.
It's also worth noting that FAST is claiming that their manifold is 15 hp better than an LS6.
When we put the modified manifold on, we lost 2 to 3 hp. So that modification doesn't really do anything.
Here is the data on the mods on the dyno engine with links to the sites where you can get more info.
Super Flow Engine Dyno
Heads = AFR heads – # 205
http://www.airflowresearch.com/
Cam = Lunati # 55004
Advertised Duration IN/EX: 283/283
Duration @.050 IN/EX: 221/221
Gross Valve Lift IN/EX: .558"/.558"
Lobe Sep Angle / Intake Ctr Line: 114/110
Valve Lash IN/EX: Hyd/Hyd
RPM Range: 2500-6000
http://www.holley.com/index.asp?division=Lunati
Short Block = Stock LS1 Crate engine
http://www.gmgoodwrench.com/perfpartsjsp/home.jsp
ECU = Reworked by FastChip
http://www.fastchip.com/
Headers = Hooker Super Comp Long tube headers
http://www.holley.com/index.asp?division=Hooker
Intake = Professional Products # 52060
www.professional-products.com
Throttle Body = Professional Products 85mm LS1
www.professional-products.com
Last edited by jimdavis@professional; 09-21-2006 at 07:14 PM.
#3
Originally Posted by jimmyblue
How did you attach the 85mm TB to an LS6 manifold?
Any sort of reducer, or just live with the step and its
airflow effects?
Any sort of reducer, or just live with the step and its
airflow effects?
#4
Am I just not seeing a link to the dyno graph? Also, I clicked on http://www.profesional-products.com/ and got a page cannot be displayed.
#5
Interesting, but i'm sure we'd all like to know how it did below 6700 rpm. While we may brush against 6700 from time to time, my engine certainly dosnt live up there. Id like to see a graph is possible. Nevertheless, thanks for finally posting some results!!!!
#6
LOL. You misspelled the name of your web page.
http://www.professional-products.com/
EDIT: Not laughing at you or anything. I do that **** too.
http://www.professional-products.com/
EDIT: Not laughing at you or anything. I do that **** too.
Last edited by Sharpe; 09-14-2006 at 07:15 PM.
#7
We will be posting a dyno chart when I can get it into a format that is suitable for posting.
For the record, we started the run at 3,400 and at that rpm the LS6 was 1 or 2 hp better and the two curves gradually got closer and closer to one another and crossed at about 5,000 and then the Typhoon gradually pulled away.
As far as misspelling the name of our webpage, my chief engineer has to take the hit for that as I just copied and pasted all the engine info he sent me. Of course, I guess I should have proofed it first. But I probably wouldn't have notice it anyway.
If anybody has any more questions I won't be able to be back on here until tomorrow morning.
For the record, we started the run at 3,400 and at that rpm the LS6 was 1 or 2 hp better and the two curves gradually got closer and closer to one another and crossed at about 5,000 and then the Typhoon gradually pulled away.
As far as misspelling the name of our webpage, my chief engineer has to take the hit for that as I just copied and pasted all the engine info he sent me. Of course, I guess I should have proofed it first. But I probably wouldn't have notice it anyway.
If anybody has any more questions I won't be able to be back on here until tomorrow morning.
Trending Topics
#10
Originally Posted by Nine Ball
We are pleased to announce that Professional Products is now a proud sponsor of LS1TECH.com!
BTW that one Looong thread has 3 dyno charts from a sponsor that sells them. It did really well. I'd buy it when i have the money.
#13
So if the Typhoon intake with 85mm tb beats a LS6 with 85mm tb woudl it be safe to say that the LSx version of this intake (basically the same thing but with the ability to accept the 96mm tb) with a 96mm tb will make even more power? I would think the 96mm tb would give a few more hp, but at least it wouldn't perform any less then what we have seen with this intake vs the LS6. I think this is close to FAST territory, especially if you go with the 96mm tb version. Plus its much less the half the price of the FAST intake.
#17
Originally Posted by svsgt1
So if the Typhoon intake with 85mm tb beats a LS6 with 85mm tb woudl it be safe to say that the LSx version of this intake (basically the same thing but with the ability to accept the 96mm tb) with a 96mm tb will make even more power? I would think the 96mm tb would give a few more hp, but at least it wouldn't perform any less then what we have seen with this intake vs the LS6. I think this is close to FAST territory, especially if you go with the 96mm tb version. Plus its much less the half the price of the FAST intake.
Just putting on a bigger throttle body that lets in more air really isn't effective unless you have done something to the engine that makes it require more air. Typically, the stock LS1 engine has the correct size throttle body on it as designed by GM. But as soon as you install a bigger cam, the engine is going to need more air and that's when a larger throttle body becomes necessary.
Then again, it is possible that the GM engineers compromised on the throttle body size for other reasons and putting a larger unit on will provide more power.
#20
Originally Posted by Viper
Interesting. I'd love to see the result of the LS1 intake with the 96mm TB.
Currently I have the FAST 90 PTM 90mm TB on my shopping list. But I could be swayed, just need a little info/proof first.