Think ALL Flowmaster mufflers lose power? Think again...
#44
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the results are:
Hooker/Magnaflow 392 rwhp / 381 trq
Hooker/Flowmaster 383 rwhp / 370 trq
Both of these tests were on the same dyno and roughly the same type of weater +/- 1-2 degrees
but 1-2 degress are not gonna make that kind of hp/trq difference...
#45
Tech Resident
Its strange you mention that... i have Hooker headers and i have had both cat back systems...
and the results are:
Hooker/Magnaflow 392 rwhp / 381 trq
Hooker/Flowmaster 383 rwhp / 370 trq
Both of these tests were on the same dyno and roughly the same type of weater +/- 1-2 degrees
but 1-2 degress are not gonna make that kind of hp/trq difference...
and the results are:
Hooker/Magnaflow 392 rwhp / 381 trq
Hooker/Flowmaster 383 rwhp / 370 trq
Both of these tests were on the same dyno and roughly the same type of weater +/- 1-2 degrees
but 1-2 degress are not gonna make that kind of hp/trq difference...
#47
Tech Resident
#49
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: venice/sarasota fl
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heres the sound clips i have, i still think its not that loud https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/831585-sound-clips-my-td-s.html
#54
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
id like see a dyno comparison of a cat back with 2 flowmaster mufflers vs. cutout.
from what ive seen, the bigger diameter flowmasters dont flow that much more than a 2.5" muffler. using 2 would increase flow over using a single 3.5" or 4" flowmaster
from what ive seen, the bigger diameter flowmasters dont flow that much more than a 2.5" muffler. using 2 would increase flow over using a single 3.5" or 4" flowmaster