When are we going to see a header shootout??
Make up some bullets to easily adapt to any type of header out there, & strap the car up to the dyno. Or do it with the engine strapped to a dyno. Adjust the A/F after every swap, and post the results.
Give us the specs on the motor, stock, or modified. This is the kind of info I would like to see. I want to know which is the best.
I'm not. I'm curious if the hundreds of $$ extra spent over say the QTP, or FLP, are worth it for 2-3 HP more over say the Hooker, Pacesetter, or Eldebrock..
Everyone seems to think that the headers they have are better than any other header out there, but I dont see any track or dyno comparisons.
I think the MAC's should be included, BBK's new 1 3/4 shorties and a basline with manifolds just to round out the playing field.
The reason for the bullets, are that you could easily bolt them up to the headers. Without having to fab up an exhaust for every muffler that you are testing. The testing would be less time consuming. If the testing was done on the car, then a dyno would get rather expensive.
This shootout needs to happen. To show what header is best, for say a stock motor, and a modified.
For the record, I have Grotts, but I'm looking at the Edelbrock, and wonder what the difference, if any, would be.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
real work. Every article I read, but one, out
of Super Chevy, Chevy High Performance and
GMHTP is all about how they went shopping, and
watched the man bolt it on. And here's what it
"should be good for" on the dyno according to
what's written on the box.
8 header swaps at 4 hours a pop (figure a lift
and experience) is like over $2000 in shop rates
and $5000 in parts. You think those magazine types
are gonna cough it up? Hah. And that doesn't even
count the dyno / tuner time needed to do it right.
And you might get a manufacturer to slide you a
set of headers if you were going to put them up
solo against stock exhaust, but up against the
whole field, pick one winner? Not such good odds
of getting the article to come out like you'd
want.
Not that I'm complaining about the magazines.
I pay my buck an issue and read the ads mostly.
The articles hardly get in the way. Heh.
Editorial Staff for GmHighTechMagazine.
Editorial Director
Jim Campisano
(201) 712-9300 ext. 611
jim.campisano@primedia.com
Editor
Johnny Hunkins
phone (201) 712-9300 ext. 605
john.hunkins@primedia.com
Reasons I like Kooks over Hookers: even with Jet Hot coating, they rust, I like the design of the Kooks better, Kooks can be had in stainless and with merge collectors, I can get Kooks without the emissions junk that I don't have
I hope this happens it's a great idea.
A little idle speculation to stir the pot...
MAC - will win in peak rwhp by a hair...won't have quiet as much torque or overal area under the curve.
Grott - PPC, Kook, QTP, and a few others with the Grott style. Will be best overall
Hooker - will just barely edge out the FLP's in area under the curve and be ~ equal in peak rwhp
FLP - the debate of FLP vs SLP will be settled in FLP's favor. The 2.5 Y pipe will be determined to cost a few rwhp
SLP - Will be the king of low end torque. Easily the best area under the curve under 4500rpm. Won't do as well over 5000 rpm.
BBK - new 1 3/4 primary shorties a few rwhp over JBA. Might beat the SLP's in peak rwhp. Will show a shorty LS1 header can actually be better than an exhaust manifold.
JBA - by like 1rwhp over 00+ exhaust manifolds
00+ exhaust manifolds -
Hooker & Edelbrock shorties by like 1rwhp over 98-99 manifolds and will be proven worthless for the most part.






