Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cam? for tsp headed 6.0 recommendations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2008, 06:47 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

if u really want the tq feel, go with CheaTR or GT11.
will make for very responsive motor.
Old 11-28-2008, 05:53 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chevboy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to the top here's the two i've had spec'd so far first from Pat G. 239/247 .624”/.624” 112LSA +4 advance

and from predatorz 236/236 .615/.607 111+0 LSA

i'm worried the one from pat won't be streetable enough but i know it'll make the numbers anyone else wanna share any input?
Old 11-29-2008, 09:05 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Pharcyde50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm running a 228/232 111 +4 on xer lobes on my 370 with TSP 2.5 LS6 heads. The car runs very strong I haven't had it dyno'd yet though. WRE did do some work to the heads to accommodate the larger bore of the 6.0l block. I didn't want the cam to be too crazy because I daily drive it 500 miles a week.
Old 11-29-2008, 10:06 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chevboy28
i have 6.0 lq9 that i'm building with arp rod bolts and tsp 2.5 5.3 heads. i want a cam that will pull up to 7k but still have plenty of low end torque. anyone with similar combo have any suggestions. anybody know if the t-rex would be good for this combo? i just know it pulls all the way to 7k. anyone? by the way it's gonna see spray too.
Wouldn't the head provider (TSP) know more about what cam to use with their ported heads than anyone else? I suggest that you have them provide you with the correct cam to get the results you desire.

They have already made suggestions. If they can't get the results you desire, how can anyone else with less knowledge of how your/their heads move air get you there?

It's a win-win situation. You get the engine performance you want and they sell more parts and make a happy customer.
Old 11-29-2008, 10:06 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chevboy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah exactly i plan on daily driving this car for the most part
Old 12-05-2008, 05:58 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chevboy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok it's down to the pat g : 239/247 .624”/.624” 112LSA +4 advance or i found a good deal on a ms4 the intake duration is the same the pat g one has a lot more exhaust trying to decide how close they would be powerwise...
Old 12-05-2008, 08:26 PM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
black01_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Myers, FL.
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I like the MS4- definatly proven, but you can't beat a custom cam made for your set up.
Old 12-06-2008, 07:06 AM
  #28  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chevboy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

which one you guys think will sound meaner?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM.