Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ported 5.3's vs ported 243's - opinions please!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2009, 12:33 PM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66deuce
true,it's only one post..but my point is you already have a good casting,why not just have someone port it for you?
like i said,not trying to bash the 5,3s,just IMO you'll be happier with the 243s..like i said,in my experience,they are a better head..
but in the end,buy what ever meets your goals and makes you happy..
I agree with this right here! You already have 243's with lightweight valves, just get them ported, send them to TSP or patriot.
Old 01-04-2009, 12:44 PM
  #42  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't have time to send my heads out for a porting. My car has already been at the shop 3-4 weeks, can't hold them up forever. The engines out getting pistons replaced under warrant. Thats what got the ball rolling. I keep sending them more and more parts trying to take advantage of having the engine out and heads off...
Old 01-04-2009, 12:46 PM
  #43  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,322
Received 435 Likes on 306 Posts

Default

No need to get rid of your 243s Save them for later... No doubt they are a good casting.
Old 01-04-2009, 01:03 PM
  #44  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well, while my engine is out and the heads are off, I can add aftermarket heads @ no additional labor charge. If I am going to get heads the time is now! After I add heads there is no point in keeping my 243's when I can sell them for $400 or so. If I wanted 243's down the road I would just buy another set at the time.

So if I buy ported stage 2.5 LS6 heads direct from TSP, I lose the lightweight vavles though, right? because theirs have Stainless ones, correct? Uggh, the dilemma just keeps piling up, lol.
Old 01-04-2009, 01:12 PM
  #45  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,322
Received 435 Likes on 306 Posts

Default

My thought was get the 5.3L heads now and finish it up. then send the 243's out later... Then you can try them both and see what you like better....
Old 01-04-2009, 02:55 PM
  #46  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
AaronR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im not debating there would be little difference between TSP's 5.3 AND 243 heads powerwise.The point is the 243 is a better head when properly ported.Take what you will save in money having the heads already and spend your money to have them ported by someone good.
Old 01-04-2009, 03:00 PM
  #47  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why don't you think TSP's porting process is any good? Im no expert but I've in all the research I've been doing I've seen countless people with their heads with good numbers. Not trying to argue with you, just curious what you base this on.
Old 01-04-2009, 03:08 PM
  #48  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
AaronR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You buy budget heads you get budget power.If your happy with that go for it.
Old 01-04-2009, 03:27 PM
  #49  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
black01_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Myers, FL.
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the ls6 heads have more room for later down the road- bigger cubes. there are quite a few 408's running the 243's.

buy some used aftermarket heads- AFR205's would be pimp. Sell your heads and then come up with 1000-1200 and you would have a bad *** set up
Old 01-04-2009, 03:50 PM
  #50  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've been looking for a good used set ever since I decided to get heads but have come across any good deals...unless you think "Mamofied" AFR 205's for $3000 is a good deal, lol.
Old 01-04-2009, 04:43 PM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Apologies to 66duece for picking apart his earlier post

Originally Posted by 66deuce
stock volumes for the 5.3 is around 200cc,the 243 is around 210cc..
the combustion chamber is more efficient,and the short side radius is better on the 243..why step backwards to a 5.3 truck head?
and before i get flamed,i ran ported 5.3 heads a few yrs ago on my old Z/28..
After reading and re-reading this entire thread, this seems to be the most important information here.

Are any of the popular porters addressing these weakness in the porting program run on 5.3 heads? Is there enough material in the short side to leave a comparable port after the CNC work is done? Ditto for the chamber.

Originally Posted by 66deuce
ported 243s all the way..your low end won't suffer compared to the 5.3s..

once ported,the runner volumes are very similar between both heads,depending on who does the porting...so the loss of velocity on the LS6 head is just a myth..
Anybody out there who knows cylinders heads willing to discuss Cross Sectional Area and other key differences between the two? Preferably before and after CNC machining...

...and yes, it would be nice to see some side-by-side dyno numbers for 5.3 vs. LS6 heads in the same combo...timeslips even better...

Old 01-04-2009, 05:08 PM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hammertime
Apologies to 66duece for picking apart his earlier post


After reading and re-reading this entire thread, this seems to be the most important information here.

Are any of the popular porters addressing these weakness in the porting program run on 5.3 heads? Is there enough material in the short side to leave a comparable port after the CNC work is done? Ditto for the chamber.


Anybody out there who knows cylinders heads willing to discuss Cross Sectional Area and other key differences between the two? Preferably before and after CNC machining...

...and yes, it would be nice to see some side-by-side dyno numbers for 5.3 vs. LS6 heads in the same combo...timeslips even better...

no apologies needed..this forum is about people offering their opinions and sharing experiences..
sometimes a heated debate get's people to open up their minds,myself included!
Old 01-04-2009, 05:11 PM
  #53  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

/\Im with this guy. I may have made my choice but Id like to see some hard, confirmable data and reasoning about these heads, rather than the "5.3's rock!" "No way 243's are better!" arguments.
Might be a topic for the advanced engineering tech section.
Old 01-04-2009, 05:24 PM
  #54  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZMONSTER!
/\Im with this guy. I may have made my choice but Id like to see some hard, confirmable data and reasoning about these heads, rather than the "5.3's rock!" "No way 243's are better!" arguments.
Might be a topic for the advanced engineering tech section.
i did say in an earlier post why i think the LS6 head are better..
maybe some else with more knowledge than me can expound on the benefits of the combustion chamber and port shape of the 243s compared to the other LS heads?
Old 01-04-2009, 06:12 PM
  #55  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,322
Received 435 Likes on 306 Posts

Default

Best to talk to some one like Richard@WCCH He would most likely be the best person to speak with. He did tell me you can not take a 5.3L head as far as 243 head. even something like trying to reshape the combustion chamber could prove to be trouble some... I wanted to have this done on a stock set But He explained it nots worth trying to re-envent the wheel when all you have to do Is get a better wheel...
Old 01-04-2009, 07:54 PM
  #56  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
ls2 bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your closet
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

you already have headers and a decent clutch right? if not id look into that before you start with the heads.
Old 01-04-2009, 08:20 PM
  #57  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (39)
 
litemup02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
I wanted to have this done on a stock set But He explained it nots worth trying to re-envent the wheel when all you have to do Is get a better wheel...
^^Well said

I'd say most of the people here are 99% street car and are just looking for out of the box power..myself included If you have a race car ..and or deep pockets. You want the best because you need it or $ isnt an issue (must be nice) I also have a smaller cam and it seems to be that the popular choice is the 5.3's. And i've been told they like nitrous due to the bump in comp.

On a side note...why is it that a $1200 set of heads flow better than a $2200 set? (AFR's) and i know that they have all kinds of potential for porting..just thought you would get more than that for the money
Old 01-04-2009, 08:27 PM
  #58  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes I am also having a Centerforce DF clutch installed, and I have a Vararam + full exhaust: Dynatech stainless LT's & X-pipe + Borla Stingers. My car dyno'd 377rwhp before the stingers. I am looking to get ~430 rwhp after heads/cam.
Old 01-04-2009, 08:33 PM
  #59  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (39)
 
litemup02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by KB99WS6
yes I am also having a Centerforce DF clutch installed, and I have a Vararam + full exhaust: Dynatech stainless LT's & X-pipe + Borla Stingers. My car dyno'd 377rwhp before the stingers. I am looking to get ~430 rwhp after heads/cam.
You should pick up more than that with heads and cam..i'd say 450 ish
Old 01-04-2009, 08:42 PM
  #60  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by litemup02

On a side note...why is it that a $1200 set of heads flow better than a $2200 set? (AFR's) and i know that they have all kinds of potential for porting..just thought you would get more than that for the money
depends on what flow bench was used,and if the operator fudged the numbers..AFRs have the most honest flow #s out there..most shops inflate their flow #s to sell heads..
and you can't judge a head based on flow #s alone..it's about the quality of airflow,not just quanity..


Quick Reply: Ported 5.3's vs ported 243's - opinions please!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.