Ported 5.3's vs ported 243's - opinions please!!
#41
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
true,it's only one post..but my point is you already have a good casting,why not just have someone port it for you?
like i said,not trying to bash the 5,3s,just IMO you'll be happier with the 243s..like i said,in my experience,they are a better head..
but in the end,buy what ever meets your goals and makes you happy..
like i said,not trying to bash the 5,3s,just IMO you'll be happier with the 243s..like i said,in my experience,they are a better head..
but in the end,buy what ever meets your goals and makes you happy..
#42
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't have time to send my heads out for a porting. My car has already been at the shop 3-4 weeks, can't hold them up forever. The engines out getting pistons replaced under warrant. Thats what got the ball rolling. I keep sending them more and more parts trying to take advantage of having the engine out and heads off...
#44
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, while my engine is out and the heads are off, I can add aftermarket heads @ no additional labor charge. If I am going to get heads the time is now! After I add heads there is no point in keeping my 243's when I can sell them for $400 or so. If I wanted 243's down the road I would just buy another set at the time.
So if I buy ported stage 2.5 LS6 heads direct from TSP, I lose the lightweight vavles though, right? because theirs have Stainless ones, correct? Uggh, the dilemma just keeps piling up, lol.
So if I buy ported stage 2.5 LS6 heads direct from TSP, I lose the lightweight vavles though, right? because theirs have Stainless ones, correct? Uggh, the dilemma just keeps piling up, lol.
#46
Im not debating there would be little difference between TSP's 5.3 AND 243 heads powerwise.The point is the 243 is a better head when properly ported.Take what you will save in money having the heads already and spend your money to have them ported by someone good.
#47
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why don't you think TSP's porting process is any good? Im no expert but I've in all the research I've been doing I've seen countless people with their heads with good numbers. Not trying to argue with you, just curious what you base this on.
#49
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Myers, FL.
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the ls6 heads have more room for later down the road- bigger cubes. there are quite a few 408's running the 243's.
buy some used aftermarket heads- AFR205's would be pimp. Sell your heads and then come up with 1000-1200 and you would have a bad *** set up
buy some used aftermarket heads- AFR205's would be pimp. Sell your heads and then come up with 1000-1200 and you would have a bad *** set up
#50
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been looking for a good used set ever since I decided to get heads but have come across any good deals...unless you think "Mamofied" AFR 205's for $3000 is a good deal, lol.
#51
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Apologies to 66duece for picking apart his earlier post
After reading and re-reading this entire thread, this seems to be the most important information here.
Are any of the popular porters addressing these weakness in the porting program run on 5.3 heads? Is there enough material in the short side to leave a comparable port after the CNC work is done? Ditto for the chamber.
Anybody out there who knows cylinders heads willing to discuss Cross Sectional Area and other key differences between the two? Preferably before and after CNC machining...
...and yes, it would be nice to see some side-by-side dyno numbers for 5.3 vs. LS6 heads in the same combo...timeslips even better...
stock volumes for the 5.3 is around 200cc,the 243 is around 210cc..
the combustion chamber is more efficient,and the short side radius is better on the 243..why step backwards to a 5.3 truck head?
and before i get flamed,i ran ported 5.3 heads a few yrs ago on my old Z/28..
the combustion chamber is more efficient,and the short side radius is better on the 243..why step backwards to a 5.3 truck head?
and before i get flamed,i ran ported 5.3 heads a few yrs ago on my old Z/28..
Are any of the popular porters addressing these weakness in the porting program run on 5.3 heads? Is there enough material in the short side to leave a comparable port after the CNC work is done? Ditto for the chamber.
...and yes, it would be nice to see some side-by-side dyno numbers for 5.3 vs. LS6 heads in the same combo...timeslips even better...
#52
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apologies to 66duece for picking apart his earlier post
After reading and re-reading this entire thread, this seems to be the most important information here.
Are any of the popular porters addressing these weakness in the porting program run on 5.3 heads? Is there enough material in the short side to leave a comparable port after the CNC work is done? Ditto for the chamber.
Anybody out there who knows cylinders heads willing to discuss Cross Sectional Area and other key differences between the two? Preferably before and after CNC machining...
...and yes, it would be nice to see some side-by-side dyno numbers for 5.3 vs. LS6 heads in the same combo...timeslips even better...
After reading and re-reading this entire thread, this seems to be the most important information here.
Are any of the popular porters addressing these weakness in the porting program run on 5.3 heads? Is there enough material in the short side to leave a comparable port after the CNC work is done? Ditto for the chamber.
Anybody out there who knows cylinders heads willing to discuss Cross Sectional Area and other key differences between the two? Preferably before and after CNC machining...
...and yes, it would be nice to see some side-by-side dyno numbers for 5.3 vs. LS6 heads in the same combo...timeslips even better...
sometimes a heated debate get's people to open up their minds,myself included!
#53
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
/\Im with this guy. I may have made my choice but Id like to see some hard, confirmable data and reasoning about these heads, rather than the "5.3's rock!" "No way 243's are better!" arguments.
Might be a topic for the advanced engineering tech section.
Might be a topic for the advanced engineering tech section.
#54
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe some else with more knowledge than me can expound on the benefits of the combustion chamber and port shape of the 243s compared to the other LS heads?
#55
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
Best to talk to some one like Richard@WCCH He would most likely be the best person to speak with. He did tell me you can not take a 5.3L head as far as 243 head. even something like trying to reshape the combustion chamber could prove to be trouble some... I wanted to have this done on a stock set But He explained it nots worth trying to re-envent the wheel when all you have to do Is get a better wheel...
#57
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (39)
I'd say most of the people here are 99% street car and are just looking for out of the box power..myself included If you have a race car ..and or deep pockets. You want the best because you need it or $ isnt an issue (must be nice) I also have a smaller cam and it seems to be that the popular choice is the 5.3's. And i've been told they like nitrous due to the bump in comp.
On a side note...why is it that a $1200 set of heads flow better than a $2200 set? (AFR's) and i know that they have all kinds of potential for porting..just thought you would get more than that for the money
#58
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes I am also having a Centerforce DF clutch installed, and I have a Vararam + full exhaust: Dynatech stainless LT's & X-pipe + Borla Stingers. My car dyno'd 377rwhp before the stingers. I am looking to get ~430 rwhp after heads/cam.
#60
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and you can't judge a head based on flow #s alone..it's about the quality of airflow,not just quanity..