View Poll Results: Torquer V.3 VS. El Torro
Torquer V.3
14
42.42%
El Torro
19
57.58%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll
Torquer V.3 VS. El Torro
02-07-2009, 08:02 PM
#2
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: houston
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
voted el torro although im going with the v3 myself i've really only seen chris make the big numbers with it although i know he's cam only and i really havent seen el torro with heads which is what im going with so it really depends what your doing h/c and i think if your an auto it makes a big difference as well "stall" what size your runnig makes a difference as well
02-07-2009, 08:09 PM
#4
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: houston
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well ive really havent seen numbers in a m6 but 422 in a auto is pretty sick so in a m6 i would love to see the numbers and its a good cam so if it's cam only i would def. put it in
02-07-2009, 09:14 PM
#6
i would say they probably are about even...if you already have a tq 3 i would just stick with that not worth the switch...now if you want to make it a dedicated track car and are willing to lose some driveability and do the other proper mods to get the power out of the cam...i say go with the polluter, ms4, or the Trex v2...all max effort track cams...otherwise just thow on a good set of heads and you are set...
02-07-2009, 09:15 PM
#7
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: houston
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
390 through a m6? seems kinda low but they never work out like others say what are other mods? idk if it would be worth it to have somebody do the work if your paying the money but if your doing the work i would say go for it and im sure you wont have a very hard time seeling that v3 on here
Trending Topics
02-08-2009, 09:50 PM
#12
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: omaha, ne
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i see 6 voted for "el torro". does anyone else besides chris have some dyno numbers with it yet? i will be ordering mine in about a week or two. i'll post as soon as i get to the dyno, wont be for a few months though.
02-08-2009, 10:08 PM
#13
Yes 417 on heavy *** tires an wheels. wheels alone are 24#'s each which cost me. Cats too but that is why I run 4* more dration on exhaust.
Ran 4 12.04 to .09's would have made a great bracket car but damn I wanna run 11's.
I will soon but I should not still be fretting with it dogonnit.
Last edited by SOMbitch; 02-10-2009 at 02:05 PM.
02-10-2009, 07:30 AM
#18
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Either one would be great cams. Although, I don't know if I would expect Chris' numbers... (with either cam)
He has one of those factory freak motors. 116mph with a stalled Auto and only Bolt-Ons is freaking insane!!!!!!
He has one of those factory freak motors. 116mph with a stalled Auto and only Bolt-Ons is freaking insane!!!!!!
02-10-2009, 11:00 AM
#19
Not factory freak. Well built car and good driver. He does every mod the RIGHT way and it adds up. That and some insane air. Doing the same things as chris and few others have. My bolt on setup has beat both the cam only cars i raced from a dig.
02-10-2009, 09:10 PM
#20
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why so concerend with dyno #'s??? I have the TRAK cam which is close to the TV3 and my car only made 360rwhp yes it is an auto and it is full weight and i ran 11.94 and the car was shifting at 5900 rpms cause my tuner forgot to re up the shift points cause we were finishing it the night be4 the track.... and it still has more in it cause it makes power to just about 7000rpmss
soo i say keep it and take it to the track and see what u can do
soo i say keep it and take it to the track and see what u can do