Trick Flow's 205cc heads
NO! This is a CROCK OF ****! Stop telling people this!!!!
TECH Resident
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 848
Likes: 1
From: Working in the shop 24/7
* subscribing *
A better question: Why are you mindlessly repeating BS that has been disproven over and over again.
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
And the pack attacks 
Why don't you just explain it to him? Instead of tearing him from all sides like a pack of hyenas.
And if it is too much for you Hardhorels1 to post anything smart beside blaspheme, WTF do you
persist on marking your territory in this forum?
This thread was started by TFS, questions were asked, poeple await TFS comments, can't we just keep it at that?
Noooo, it is feeding time
Why don't you just explain it to him? Instead of tearing him from all sides like a pack of hyenas.
And if it is too much for you Hardhorels1 to post anything smart beside blaspheme, WTF do you
persist on marking your territory in this forum?This thread was started by TFS, questions were asked, poeple await TFS comments, can't we just keep it at that?
Noooo, it is feeding time
And the pack attacks
Why don't you just explain it to him? Instead of tearing him from all sides like a pack of hyenas.
And if it is too much for you Hardhorels1 to post anything smart beside blaspheme, WTF do you persist on marking your territory in this forum?
This thread was started by TFS, questions were asked, poeple await TFS comments, can't we just keep it at that?
Noooo, it is feeding time
Why don't you just explain it to him? Instead of tearing him from all sides like a pack of hyenas.
And if it is too much for you Hardhorels1 to post anything smart beside blaspheme, WTF do you
persist on marking your territory in this forum?This thread was started by TFS, questions were asked, poeple await TFS comments, can't we just keep it at that?
Noooo, it is feeding time
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
And you make that at which rpm?
How about below that?
Is your lower than peak rpm output affected by having larger ports?
What is the relation between amount of air moved and velocity?
Does your 250cc intake have the same velocity as a smaller runner? If so why?
Better yet; why is velocity crutial? Is there anything like too much velocity? or too little?
Are intake runner size directly related to size of engine? Are your 250cc the optimum for your 346 cid? If so for what purpose?
Come on Mr Ghost, comming out and saying some comment is a crock of S*** is fine, but please explain why?
Spectre86 made a comment, you come on and flame him. Don't you think you ought to explain why?
I am not saying his comments are valid, but the manner in which you express yourself with such aggression deserves an expanation IMO.
Or is "I have 250cc intake runners and I make XXX amount of trq your explanation?"
How about below that?
Is your lower than peak rpm output affected by having larger ports?
What is the relation between amount of air moved and velocity?
Does your 250cc intake have the same velocity as a smaller runner? If so why?
Better yet; why is velocity crutial? Is there anything like too much velocity? or too little?
Are intake runner size directly related to size of engine? Are your 250cc the optimum for your 346 cid? If so for what purpose?
Come on Mr Ghost, comming out and saying some comment is a crock of S*** is fine, but please explain why?
Spectre86 made a comment, you come on and flame him. Don't you think you ought to explain why?
I am not saying his comments are valid, but the manner in which you express yourself with such aggression deserves an expanation IMO.
Or is "I have 250cc intake runners and I make XXX amount of trq your explanation?"
Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; May 17, 2009 at 06:18 AM.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
And you make that at which rpm?
How about below that?
Is your lower than peak rpm output affected by having larger ports?
What is the relation between amount of air moved and velocity?
Does your 250cc intake have the same velocity as a smaller runner? If so why?
Better yet; why is velocity crutial? Is there anything like too much velocity? or too little?
Are intake runner size directly related to size of engine? Are your 250cc the optimum for your 346 cid? If so for what purpose?
Come on Mr Ghost, comming out and saying some comment is a crock of S*** is fine, but please explain why?
Spectre86 made a comment, you come on and flame him. Don't you think you ought to explain why?
I am not saying his comments are valid, but the manner in which you express yourself with such aggression deserves an expanation IMO.
Or is "I have 250cc intake runners and I make XXX amount of trq your explanation?"
How about below that?
Is your lower than peak rpm output affected by having larger ports?
What is the relation between amount of air moved and velocity?
Does your 250cc intake have the same velocity as a smaller runner? If so why?
Better yet; why is velocity crutial? Is there anything like too much velocity? or too little?
Are intake runner size directly related to size of engine? Are your 250cc the optimum for your 346 cid? If so for what purpose?
Come on Mr Ghost, comming out and saying some comment is a crock of S*** is fine, but please explain why?
Spectre86 made a comment, you come on and flame him. Don't you think you ought to explain why?
I am not saying his comments are valid, but the manner in which you express yourself with such aggression deserves an expanation IMO.
Or is "I have 250cc intake runners and I make XXX amount of trq your explanation?"
Am I being too aggressive?
Jon
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Nice one Jon, that is not what this is about. As usual you miss the point.
Why not let flaming Ghost fend for himself.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
It was a serious technical request to you, PZ. (Have you a given name you can share?). I was trying to keep the topic technical rather than fan the flames. So how about sharing your technical views on the subject. I assume you have some.
Jon
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Jon,
That would be like me asking you to give me you views on tactical support for XX Company. No thank you, you'll not draw me onto your battlefield.
I am not a head designer or porter for that matter, but I manage my way around.
The point of my reply to Mr Ghost is to quit flaming others like he knows it all (I can bring up threads from other sites to prove how much he really knows) and to quit disturbing the peace in LS1tech as part of smarthore troll pack. There are ways of discussing tech but it doesn't necessarily always involve ridicule towards others like you guys always do.
Man if all the knowledge some of you guys have would be put towards helping others instead of trying to discredit them; think of all the good tech help you could achieve?
Anything you cannot make a $$ doesn't interest you, you are here simply for 2 reasons:
1- To draw free publicilty to make a $$
2- To ridicule others and some sponsors to pump your ego and feed your free publicity.
Nice try though
That would be like me asking you to give me you views on tactical support for XX Company. No thank you, you'll not draw me onto your battlefield.
I am not a head designer or porter for that matter, but I manage my way around.
The point of my reply to Mr Ghost is to quit flaming others like he knows it all (I can bring up threads from other sites to prove how much he really knows) and to quit disturbing the peace in LS1tech as part of smarthore troll pack. There are ways of discussing tech but it doesn't necessarily always involve ridicule towards others like you guys always do.
Man if all the knowledge some of you guys have would be put towards helping others instead of trying to discredit them; think of all the good tech help you could achieve?
Anything you cannot make a $$ doesn't interest you, you are here simply for 2 reasons:
1- To draw free publicilty to make a $$
2- To ridicule others and some sponsors to pump your ego and feed your free publicity.
Nice try though
Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; May 18, 2009 at 04:30 AM.
Alright here we go again!
So what would be the niche that these heads were meant to fill?
I wouldnt ever buy these, I think that I can get all that I want out of a stock casting head, but they do seem to be reasonably priced compared to the competition.
How much for bare heads?
So what would be the niche that these heads were meant to fill?
I wouldnt ever buy these, I think that I can get all that I want out of a stock casting head, but they do seem to be reasonably priced compared to the competition.
How much for bare heads?
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Jon,
That would be like me asking you to give me you views on tactical support for XX Company. No thank you, you'll not draw me onto your battlefield.
I am not a head designer or porter for that matter, but I manage my way around.
The point of my reply to Mr Ghost is to quit flaming others like he knows it all (I can bring up threads from other sites to prove how much he really knows) and to quit disturbing the peace in LS1tech as part of smarthore troll pack. There are ways of discussing tech but it doesn't necessarily always involve ridicule towards others like you guys always do.
Man if all the knowledge some of you guys have would be put towards helping others instead of trying to discredit them; think of all the good tech help you could achieve?
Anything you cannot make a $$ doesn't interest you, you are here simply for 2 reasons:
1- To draw free publicilty to make a $$
2- To ridicule others and some sponsors to pump your ego and feed your free publicity.
Nice try though
That would be like me asking you to give me you views on tactical support for XX Company. No thank you, you'll not draw me onto your battlefield.
I am not a head designer or porter for that matter, but I manage my way around.
The point of my reply to Mr Ghost is to quit flaming others like he knows it all (I can bring up threads from other sites to prove how much he really knows) and to quit disturbing the peace in LS1tech as part of smarthore troll pack. There are ways of discussing tech but it doesn't necessarily always involve ridicule towards others like you guys always do.
Man if all the knowledge some of you guys have would be put towards helping others instead of trying to discredit them; think of all the good tech help you could achieve?
Anything you cannot make a $$ doesn't interest you, you are here simply for 2 reasons:
1- To draw free publicilty to make a $$
2- To ridicule others and some sponsors to pump your ego and feed your free publicity.
Nice try though
I now understand why you will not give your real name.
Jon Bauer
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Show where I said I have no technical knowledge. I said I am not a head porter nor a head designer.
My real name? many poeple know it here.
Your attemps to once again draw me into your s*** zone is not going to work. I have no ego to boost unlike yourself.
What I do on this net can or cannot be taken into consideration by anyone if they so desire. I have my ways of doing cams and have proven some pretty good results on some combos.
I do not force anyone to run any of my grinds, I do not charge anyone for any specs or advice, I'm just a gearhead and all of this keeps me in touch with what I love.
Can we get back on the TFS 205? Do you have any input, testing or anything remotely similar?
If not, poeple here are awaiting TFS feedback.