Revised Comp918 Failure!
#21
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lets assume for a minute a perfect 1.800 installed height (but I cant be 100%)
Springs claim a .625 lift....
Cam had max lift of .603....
7.425 Pushrods
LS7 Lifters (+.060 over LS1)
Stock Head and Gasket....
Could the LS7 Lifters and 7.425 even on a 1.800 installed height cause a bind or at least been way too close for comfort? I understand that they are hydraulic lifters and that its end user that should measure but damn .060 is alot to not know about...I wish GM advertised that!
Springs claim a .625 lift....
Cam had max lift of .603....
7.425 Pushrods
LS7 Lifters (+.060 over LS1)
Stock Head and Gasket....
Could the LS7 Lifters and 7.425 even on a 1.800 installed height cause a bind or at least been way too close for comfort? I understand that they are hydraulic lifters and that its end user that should measure but damn .060 is alot to not know about...I wish GM advertised that!
#24
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No I haven't personaly but it is the general concensus.
There is visual proof as well. I started checking that out when failures started to appear.
LS7 in left in both pics
There is visual proof as well. I started checking that out when failures started to appear.
LS7 in left in both pics