Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Revised Comp918 Failure!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2009, 12:04 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1Silverado05
Lets assume for a minute a perfect 1.800 installed height (but I cant be 100%)

Springs claim a .625 lift....
Cam had max lift of .603....
7.425 Pushrods
LS7 Lifters (+.060 over LS1)
Stock Head and Gasket....

Could the LS7 Lifters and 7.425 even on a 1.800 installed height cause a bind or at least been way too close for comfort? I understand that they are hydraulic lifters and that its end user that should measure but damn .060 is alot to not know about...I wish GM advertised that!
You were running too much preload which could have bottomed/ or close to, the lifter. Kinda like running non hydraulic. That with cold spring and added bad harmonic resonnance could have caused the spring to shatter at a higher rpm. (this is just speculation).
Old 05-24-2009, 02:08 AM
  #22  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
You were running too much preload which could have bottomed/ or close to, the lifter. Kinda like running non hydraulic. That with cold spring and added bad harmonic resonnance could have caused the spring to shatter at a higher rpm. (this is just speculation).
Thats what I was thinking... I had no idea about the LS7 lifters...man Im glad I saw your post about that ****. I wont make the same mistake on this car!!
Old 05-24-2009, 08:04 AM
  #23  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1Silverado05
**Update**

LS7 lifters are official GM LS1/LS6 replacement lifters, wht GM fails to mention is that LS7 lifters have aproximately .060 higher cup and require shorter pushrods to re-establish preload in the correct range.
Did you measure this or read this somewhere?
Old 05-24-2009, 10:27 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

No I haven't personaly but it is the general concensus.

There is visual proof as well. I started checking that out when failures started to appear.

LS7 in left in both pics
Attached Thumbnails Revised Comp918 Failure!-ls7-lifter.jpg   Revised Comp918 Failure!-ls7-lifter-comparison.jpg  
Old 05-24-2009, 10:45 AM
  #25  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I think I have both of those lifters, I remember seeing one wheel covered more than the other in one of the older sets of lifters.

Ill measure them and see the diffence in the height of the pushrod seats.
Old 05-24-2009, 11:20 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Cool, keep us posted
Old 05-27-2009, 09:09 PM
  #27  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I was so busy I completely forgot to look today. Ive emailed myself at work as a reminder.....




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.